ST0-172 Braindumps

Killexams.com ST0-172 brain dumps are best to Pass | cheat sheets | stargeo.it

Official ST0-172 test is very hard to pass Our Killexams.com ST0-172 Study Guide with real questions and brain dumps is ultimate source of knowledge to pass the test in first attempt - cheat sheets - stargeo.it

Pass4sure ST0-172 dumps | Killexams.com ST0-172 true questions | http://www.stargeo.it/new/


Killexams.com ST0-172 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with towering Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



ST0-172 exam Dumps Source : Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment

Test Code : ST0-172
Test title : Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment
Vendor title : Symantec
: 108 true Questions

it's miles extraordinary to suffer ST0-172 question fiscal institution and suffer a examine at manual.
My view of the ST0-172 test charge guide was negative as I always wanted to suffer the preparation by a test mode in a class margin and for that I joined two different classes but those every seemed a fake thing for me and I quit them immediately. Then I did the search and ultimately changed my thinking about the ST0-172 test samples and I started with the selfsame from killexams. It really gave me the suited scores in the exam and I am joyful to suffer that.


New Syllabus ST0-172 Exam prep study guide with questions are provided here.
The arrangement time for ST0-172 exam was truly a pleasant undergo for me. Effectively passing, I suffer figured out how to limpid every the further levels. Because of killexams.com Questions & Answers for every the assistance. I had constrained time for preparation yet killexams.com brain dumps turned out to live a aid for me. It had significant question and answers that made me diagram in a short compass.


actual test ST0-172 Questions and solutions.
The short answers made my steerage more handy. I finished seventy five questions out off 80 nicely under the stipulated time and managed eighty%. My aspiration to live an authorized pick the exam ST0-172. I were given the killexams.com guide definitely 2 weeks before the exam. Thank you.


i organize a exquisite supply for ST0-172 dumps
Thankyou killexams..I suffer cleared my ST0-172 exam with 92%. Your Question Bank was very helpful. If anybody practices 100% truly from your question set and studies every the questions rightly, then he will definately succeed. Till now I suffer cleared 3 other exams every with the aid of your site. Thank you again.


Can i am getting brand original dumps with true Q & A of ST0-172 examination?
The excellent component approximately your questions bank is the explanations provided with the solutions. It helps to understand the topic conceptually. I had subscribed for the ST0-172 questions and answers and had long gone thru it three-4 times. within the exam, I tried every the questions under forty mins and scored 90 marks. thank you for making it clean for us. Hearty artery to killexams.com crew, with the assist of your version questions.


were given maximum ST0-172 Quiz in true pick a examine at that I prepared.
The crew in the back of killexams.com necessity to severely pat their returned for a activity well achieved! I suffer no doubts whilst pronouncing that with killexams.com, there is no threat which you dont bag to live a ST0-172. virtually recommending it to the others and every of the top class for the future you guys! What a notable examine time has it been with the aid for ST0-172 available at the internet site. You had been fancy a chum, a genuine buddy indeed.


forget the entirety! just forcus on those ST0-172 questions.
A score of 86% changed into beyond my preference noting every of the questions internal due time I got around 90% questions nearly equal to the killexams.com dumps. My preparation turn out to live most extensively dreadful with the knotty subjects i used to live looking down some solid smooth material for the exam ST0-172. I started perusing the Dumps and killexams.com repaired my troubles.


Take these ST0-172 questions and answers before you Go to vacations for test prep.
I could undoubtedly deal with 93% marks in the quit of the exam, as numerous questions were fancy the adviser for me. Much appreciated to the killexams. I had a weight from office to split the exam ST0-172. However, I was stressed over taking a decent planning in Little time. At that point, the killexams.com aide showed up as a windfall for me, with its simple and short replies.


No source is more powerful than this ST0-172 source.
I might probably advocate it to my partners and accomplices. I were given 360 of imprints. I was enchanted with the effects I had been given with the assist test guide ST0-172 exam route dump. I commonly notion actual and tremendous researchwere the reaction to every or any exams, until I took the assistance of killexams.com brain promote off to pass my exam ST0-172. Fantastically fulfill.


surprised to examine ST0-172 actual test questions!
Ive renewed my membership this time for ST0-172 exam. I accept my involvement with killexams.com is so notable it is not feasible submission thru no longer having a membership. I am capable of in reality accept as genuine with killexams.com tests for my exam. Simply this net web page can assist me reap my ST0-172 accredition and assist me in getting above ninety 5% marks within the exam. You every are truely making an powerful showing. Preserve it up!


Symantec Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for

Symantec Ships original NetBackup and Backup Exec | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

With the newly launched NetBackup 7.5 and Backup Exec 2012 utility, Symantec is hoping to lure IT execs with the vow of more advantageous efficiency, improved back for digital infrastructures and more cloud storage alternatives. possibly most compelling, to storage administrators at least, is the haphazard of streamlining their backup innovations.

"With Symantec options, backup has certainly not been less difficult," referred to Deepak Mohan, senior vice president of Symantec counsel administration neighborhood. "we are dedicated to featuring groups with the gear they should manage their tips now and because the explosion in statistics continues," he brought.

Symantec has understanding to strive for a simplified, effortless-to-control backup ecosystem. a large number of storage directors are overwhelmed by means of their backup toolset, based on the company. Citing results from a corporation-run survey of 1,four hundred IT worker's, 28 p.c "have too many backup equipment."

In response, Backup Exec receives an up to date administration console facets a brand original design with a simplified view of physical and digital belongings. NetBackup 7.5 boasts simplified search and recovery features to aid in the technique of prison holds.

IT admins would not mind a Little more efficiency, both. and that they're willing to bounce ship to bag it. in keeping with Symantec, "72-p.c willingness to switch backup items if their speed doubled."

In hopes that they will land in its ready hands, the traffic claims that it has re-tooled NetBackup to supply an up to 100-fold backup velocity increase. Cloud storage options involve Amazon internet features (AWS), Rackspace and AT&T, in addition to previous aid for Nirvanix.

also on tap is NetApp Snapshots integration. Symantec's partnership with NetApp is getting cozier with the word that NetApp will resell NetBackup Replication to centralize administration over SnapVault and SnapMirror along with Symantec's backup platform.

in the meantime, Backup Exec is likewise broadening its VMware data coverage guide. original to the 2012 edition is VMware competent information protection certification for vSphere 5.0, that means that it complies with the Hardware version eight specification for vSphere Storage DRS, Storage vMotion and VMware digital machines.

On the cloud entrance, Symantec is gearing up for an upcoming Backup Exec Cloud DR alternative powered by recovery services issuer Doyenz. The function, according to Symantec, will "allow cloud-based application recovery in lower than 15 minutes." Nirvanix cloud backup remains an choice.

NetBackup 7.5 and Backup Exec 2012 can live organize now.

Pedro Hernandez is a contributor to the IT traffic facet community, the network for expertise authorities. prior to now, he served as a managing editor for the web.com network of IT-connected web sites and because the eco-friendly IT curator for GigaOM professional. comply with him on Twitter @ecoINSITE.

comply with InfoStor on Twitter


Symantec backup purposes bag makeovers for velocity, VMs | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Symantec Corp. nowadays rolled out improvements to its backup functions, including a quicker backup mode and stronger examine for NetBackup 7.5, as well as virtual computing device backup enhancements and a brand original interface for Backup Exec 2012.

Symantec claims it expanded the backup pace in its NetBackup enterprise backup software with the addition of a NetBackup Accelerator function. The accelerator office reduces traditional complete backups to the pace of incremental backups for thousands and thousands of miniature files, in accordance with Symantec.

“they are aphorism the pace has been accelerated with the aid of one hundred X, which is a bold claim,” pointed out Jason Buffington, an analyst at traffic strategy community (ESG). “They built-in know-how from client-facet deduplication. First, data are recognized after which the constituents of the file that suffer modified are deduped.”

Symantec streamlined its file gadget scanning, and uses exchange file tracking and deduplication to back up most efficient the changed blocks or sub-file smooth changes.

“Deduplication is finished at the obstruct stage so they don’t dispatch the total file throughout,” mentioned Danny Milrad, Symantec’s director of product advertising. “here is an evolution of deduplication during which they eradicated the scan time.”

Symantec additionally formed a partnership with network gear to enhance a NetApp Replication Director feature within NetBackup 7.5, which now helps NetApp’s SnapMirror and SnapVault. Snapshots are pulled into NetBackup so administrators can control from the backup software and that they likewise can utilize snapshots to retrieve information.

“that you would live able to restore from disk or tape and now you could restoration from NetApp snapshots,” mentioned Buffington.

NetBackup can likewise now result greater granular searches, create an audit path and behavior federated searches throughout every domains or simply search an remoted domain, referred to Milrad. prior to now, NetBackup had a remedial search capacity that turned into not designed for e-discovery. The traffic has constructed a brand original index technology in the backup utility it is similar to the one in its traffic Vault archiving application.

“When a backup is carried out, they result a file gear scan to tune the metadata attributes for the backup files for more granular searches,” Milrad mentioned.

Backup Exec V-Ray

Symantec introduced V-Ray for virtual machines to its windows-primarily based Backup Exec software. The V-Ray edition includes a backup-to-digital office that makes it practicable for valued clientele to fix a production server from a VMware or Microsoft Hyper-V digital machine with the aid of treating the digital laptop as a backup goal. When data is backed up to a actual BackupExec server, a picture likewise is constructed.

“in case you lose an entire construction computing device, you could just spin up a virtual laptop,” ESG’s Buffington referred to. “that you may suppose of it as a pre-staged naked metal recovery.”

Backup Exec 2012 likewise includes a brand original wizard-primarily based user interface that reduces the multi-set backup process privilege down to three mouse clicks. The interface lets the backup administrator rapidly identify the server, information set and the insurance policy/retention policy when conducting backups.

“earlier than [the original process], it changed into about even if each and every project was achieved. They optimized the interface to reveal that the faultfinding workloads had been protected instead of the projects,” said Sean Regan, Symantec’s senior director of product advertising and marketing.

Symantec likewise made license alterations in BackupExec 2012. Backup Exec 2012 V-Ray edition lets valued clientele license on a per-socket basis. in the past, Syamntec’s licensing established on actual servers with an alternative so as to add virtual assist.

“It adjustments pricing so customers don’t ought to purchase a actual license,” Regan observed.

The Backup Exec 2012 miniature company edition makes it practicable for shoppers to protect a highest of three servers without dealing with assorted licenses and brokers. A unique license includes every brokers and assist for Microsoft exchange, Sequel Server and Hyper-V. “This radically shrinks the variety of SKUs,” Buffington referred to.


Symantec's NetBackup ameliorate aims VM Backup and healing | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Symantec's NetBackup upgrade aims VM Backup and recovery

Symantec ultimate week rolled out the first ameliorate to its NetBackup enterprise backup and healing carrier in two years. The traffic noted it gave NetBackup 7.6 a powerful performance enhance and tuned it up for environments using its replication engine for vSphere.

while Symantec is arguably the main company of traffic backup and restoration utility, a slew of challengers are focused on its dominance and suffer concentrated on the proliferation of virtual datacenters. Many suffer argued that NetBackup was now not maintaining with this trend.

although no longer pointing to any specific issues with NetBackup 7.5, Symantec Senior Product advertising manager Glen Simon talked about there is a companywide accent on improving Symantec's software. "across the board there may live an increased accent on best," Simon stated. "This release is getting ready shoppers for the subsequent technology of the contemporaneous datacenters."

On a towering stage Symantec referred to NetBackup 7.6 is designed for businesses that are evolving their infrastructure to software-defined datacenters. the brand original free up is designed to automate tremendous-scale records protection even for those on the cusp of creating that transition. in line with the company's own research, the quantity of records groups are developing is expanding at as much as 70 p.c yearly, which the brand original unencumber is designed to tackle with the aid of providing greater automation and faster performance.

Simon emphasised that NetBackup 7.6 likewise addresses the shift to the extend of digital machines and goals VMware environments. especially it uses NetBackup Replication Director to protect VMware environments, according to Simon. it can likewise utilize NetApp snapshots taken from its arrays to protect virtualized environments. the brand original release can recuperate VMware vSphere VMs four hundred times sooner than its predecessor, the enterprise claims.

VMware's dominance even if, or not it's no longer the only hypervisor agencies are the usage of. So what about Microsoft's Hyper-V? "Going forward probably the most essential makes a speciality of the subsequent unlock might live Hyper-V," Simon spoke of.

Given the competitive panorama and extend of Hyper-V, the enterprise would live sagacious not to wait a further two years for that upgrade.

Posted by Jeffrey Schwartz on 01/27/2014 at 9:fifty four AM


Whilst it is very hard chore to pick dependable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people bag ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com fabricate it inevitable to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients arrive to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and character because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self confidence is notable to every of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you survey any bogus report posted by their competitor with the title killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something fancy this, just maintain in mind that there are always faulty people damaging reputation of suited services due to their benefits. There are a large number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams rehearse questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu


HP2-E27 rehearse test | 700-260 rehearse test | 000-318 free pdf download | 1V0-603 exam prep | 650-251 study guide | HP0-781 sample test | 000-163 test questions | 70-549-CSharp cram | 000-731 rehearse questions | HPE2-E55 true questions | CLO-001 true questions | HP0-262 cheat sheets | HP3-C30 questions and answers | P3OF braindumps | ICGB test prep | LOT-805 dumps questions | C2150-200 bootcamp | NS0-153 true questions | 000-911 test prep | 1Z0-327 questions and answers |


Exactly selfsame ST0-172 questions as in true test, WTF!
At killexams.com, they convey completely tested Symantec ST0-172 actual Questions and Answers that are of late required for Passing ST0-172 exam. They beyond question empower people to prepare to prep the and guarantee. It is a superb altenative to accelerate your situation as a specialist inside the Industry.

If you are inquisitive about passing the Symantec ST0-172 exam to originate earning? killexams.com has forefront developed Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment test questions that will fabricate sure you pass this ST0-172 exam! killexams.com delivers you the foremost correct, current and latest updated ST0-172 exam questions and out there with a 100 percent refund guarantee. There are several firms that present ST0-172 brain dumps however those are not correct and latest ones. Preparation with killexams.com ST0-172 original questions will live a best thing to pass ST0-172 exam in straight forward means. We are every cognizant that a significant drawback within the IT traffic is there's an absence of character study dumps. Their test preparation dumps provides you everything you will suffer to live compelled to pick a certification test. Their Symantec ST0-172 exam offers you with test questions with verified answers that replicate the actual test. These Questions and Answers present you with the expertise of taking the particular exam. prime character and worth for the ST0-172 exam. 100% guarantee to pass your Symantec ST0-172 exam and acquire your Symantec certification. They suffer a drift at killexams.com are committed to assist you pass your ST0-172 exam with towering scores. The probabilities of you failing your ST0-172 exam, once memorizing their comprehensive brain dumps are little. Symantec ST0-172 is rare every round the globe, and likewise the traffic and programming arrangements gave by them are being grasped by each one of the organizations. They necessity aid in driving an outsized ambit of organizations on the far side any doubt. So much reaching learning of ST0-172 eam are viewed as a vital capability, and likewise the specialists certified by them are exceptionally prestigious altogether associations.

Quality and Value for the ST0-172 Exam: killexams.com rehearse Exams for Symantec ST0-172 are made to the most raised standards of particular accuracy, using simply certified theme experts and dispersed makers for development.

100% Guarantee to Pass Your ST0-172 Exam: If you don't pass the Symantec ST0-172 exam using their killexams.com testing programming and PDF, they will give you a complete REFUND of your purchasing charge.

Downloadable, Interactive ST0-172 Testing Software: Their Symantec ST0-172 Preparation Material gives you that you should pick Symantec ST0-172 exam. Inconspicuous components are investigated and made by Symantec Certification Experts ceaselessly using industry undergo to convey correct, and authentic.

- Comprehensive questions and answers about ST0-172 exam - ST0-172 exam questions joined by displays - Verified Answers by Experts and very nearly 100% right - ST0-172 exam questions updated on generic premise - ST0-172 exam planning is in various determination questions (MCQs). - Tested by different circumstances previously distributing - Try free ST0-172 exam demo before you pick to bag it in killexams.com

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on website
PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders


ST0-172 Practice Test | ST0-172 examcollection | ST0-172 VCE | ST0-172 study guide | ST0-172 practice exam | ST0-172 cram


Killexams Praxis-Core pdf download | Killexams 310-400 study guide | Killexams 6402 exam prep | Killexams HP0-787 rehearse test | Killexams 2B0-103 test prep | Killexams 640-803 dumps questions | Killexams 920-463 rehearse test | Killexams 9A0-365 exam questions | Killexams 9L0-206 dumps | Killexams ISTQB-Level-1 braindumps | Killexams P2170-037 dump | Killexams 9A0-039 questions answers | Killexams FC0-U11 rehearse questions | Killexams HP2-B119 test prep | Killexams HP2-B22 questions and answers | Killexams C9010-251 examcollection | Killexams C2090-424 sample test | Killexams AZ-300 free pdf | Killexams 650-157 test prep | Killexams 090-600 true questions |


killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


Killexams 1Z0-070 braindumps | Killexams 00M-602 dumps questions | Killexams 300-320 bootcamp | Killexams 920-462 free pdf | Killexams C2040-414 true questions | Killexams HP0-M21 pdf download | Killexams 70-464 sample test | Killexams 000-J02 study guide | Killexams 1Z0-053 cheat sheets | Killexams ST0-173 cram | Killexams 1Z0-820 rehearse questions | Killexams 1Z0-457 test prep | Killexams DCAN-100 braindumps | Killexams DCAPE-100 true questions | Killexams CSSGB test questions | Killexams 3M0-250 questions and answers | Killexams LOT-952 VCE | Killexams 000-546 rehearse test | Killexams JN0-331 true questions | Killexams C2010-506 examcollection |


Symantec NetBackup 7.5 for Windows(R) Technical Assessment

Pass 4 sure ST0-172 dumps | Killexams.com ST0-172 true questions | http://www.stargeo.it/new/

Nokia Corporation Interim Report for Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

This is a summary of the third quarter 2013 and January - September 2013 interim report published today. The complete third quarter 2013 and January - September 2013 interim report with tables is available at http://www.results.nokia.com/results/Nokia_results2013Q3e.pdf. Investors should not confidence on summaries of their interim reports only, but should review the complete interim reports with tables.

Third quarter 2013 highlights: Nokia Group non-IFRS EPS in Q3 2013 was EUR 0.01; reported EPS was EUR -0.02 - Nokia Group achieved underlying operating profitability for the fifth consecutive quarter, with a Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of 3.8%, driven by stout performances by Nokia Solutions and Networks (NSN) and HERE.- Nokia Group ended Q3 with a stout balance sheet and solid cash position, with monstrous cash of EUR 9.1 billion and net cash of EUR 2.4 billion. Excluding the acquisition of Siemens` stake in NSN for EUR 1.7 billion, Nokia Group net cash was approximately flat sequentially. At the quit of Q3 NSN`s contribution to Nokia Group monstrous and net cash was EUR 2.7 billion and EUR 1.5 billion, respectively. - NSN achieved underlying profitability for the sixth consecutive quarter, with Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of 8.4%, reflecting stout monstrous margin and continued progress relative to its strategy in a seasonally decrepit quarter. - HERE achieved Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of 9.5%, reflecting solid monstrous margin and operational efficiency. - Devices & Services achieved Q3 non-IFRS operating margin of negative 1.6%.

Nokia Group net sales in Q3 2013 were EUR 5.7 billion, flat quarter-on-quarter - NSN Q3 net sales decreased 7% quarter-on-quarter to EUR 2.6 billion, primarily reflecting seasonality and NSN`s strategic focus.- HERE Q3 net sales decreased 9% quarter-on-quarter to EUR 0.2 billion, primarily due to lower seasonal sales to vehicle customers.- Devices & Services Q3 net sales increased 6% quarter-on-quarter to EUR 2.9 billion.

- Lumia Q3 volumes increased 19% quarter-on-quarter to 8.8 million units, reflecting their recently broadened Lumia product ambit and stout customer demand, particularly for the Lumia 520.- Mobile Phones Q3 volumes increased 4% quarter-on-quarter to 55.8 million units, demonstrating solid performance across the majority of their portfolio due to recently launched devices, particularly the Nokia 105, the Asha 501, and the Nokia 210.

Additional information Commencing the fourth quarter 2013, and topic to shareholder approval of the sale of substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic at their Extraordinary generic Meeting (EGM), Nokia expects to report substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic as discontinued operations. If Nokia Group would suffer reported substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic as discontinued operations in the third quarter 2013 the net sales of its continuing operations would suffer been EUR 2.9 billion, which is EUR 2.8 billion lower than Nokia Group net sales of EUR 5.7 billion.  However, Nokia Group`s non-IFRS operating margin of its continuing operations would suffer been 11.5%, which is 7.7 percentage points higher than the third quarter 2013 non-IFRS operating margin of 3.8%.

January-September 2013 highlights: Nokia Group net sales in January-September 2013 were EUR 17.2 billion - Nokia Group net sales for the nine months ended September 2013 decreased 22% year-on-year.- Reported EPS for the nine months ended September 2013 was EUR -0.16, compared to EUR -0.89 in the nine months ended September 2012.

Risto Siilasmaa, Nokia Chairman and interim CEO commented on the company`s progress: "Subject to the planned completion of the Microsoft transaction, Nokia will suffer three established businesses: NSN, HERE and Advanced Technologies.

Our strategy labor is making suited progress and it has already become limpid that there are meaningful opportunities for every of their traffic areas: NSN, HERE and Advanced Technologies. In every of these businesses, they suffer stout assets that they continue to invest in for the long term benefit of their customers and shareholders."

Commenting on the third quarter results, Timo Ihamuotila, Nokia CFO and interim President, said: "The third quarter was among the most transformative in their company`s history. They became the complete owner of NSN and they agreed on the sale of their handset operations to Microsoft, transactions which they believe will radically reshape the future of Nokia for the better. topic to the completion of the Microsoft transaction, Nokia will suffer significantly improved earnings profile, stout fiscal position and a solid foundation from which to invest.

We are pleased that NSN and HERE both generated solid profitability in what was a seasonally decrepit third quarter and at a time when they continue to fabricate significant R&D investments into future growth opportunities."

SUMMARY fiscal INFORMATION

  Reported and Non-IFRSthird quarter 2013 results1,2,3 Reported and Non-IFRS January-September 2013 results1,2,3,4 EUR million Q3/13 Q3/12 YoYChange Q2/13 QoQChange Q1-Q3/13 Q1-Q3/12 YoY Change Nokia Net sales 5 662 7 239 -22 % 5 695 -1 % 17 209 22 135 -22 % Operating profit 118 -564 -115 -147 -2 726 Operating profit(non-IFRS) 215 90 139 % 303 -29 % 699 -493 EPS, EUR diluted  -0.02 -0.26 -0.06  -0.16 -0.89 EPS, EUR diluted(non-IFRS)5  0.01 -0.07 0.00  -0.01 -0.23 Net cash fromoperatingactivities 9 -429 -196 19 -917 Net cash andother liquidassets6 2 413 3 564 -32 % 4 067 -41 % 2 413 3 564 -32 % Devices &Services7 Net sales 2 898 3 563 -19 % 2 724 6 % 8 510 11 832 -28 % Smart Devicesnet sales 1 254 976 28 % 1 164 8 % 3 582 4 221 -15 % MobilePhonesnet sales 1 489 2 366 -37 % 1 405 6 % 4 484 6 968 -36 % Mobiledevicevolume(mn units) 64.6 82.9 -22 % 61.1 6 % 187.6 249.3 -25 % SmartDevicesvolume(mn units) 8.8 6.3 40 % 7.4 19 % 22.3 28.4 -21 % MobilePhonesvolume(mn units) 55.8 76.6 -27 % 53.7 4 % 165.3 220.9 -25 % MobiledeviceASP8 45 43 5 % 45 0 % 45 47 -4 % SmartDevicesASP8 143 155 -8 % 157 -9 % 161 149 8 % MobilePhonesASP8 27 31 -13 % 26 4 % 27 32 -16 % Operatingprofit -86 -672 -33 -161 -1 363 Operatingprofit(non-IFRS) -47 -252 -32 -75 -742 Operatingmargin % -3.0% -18.9% -1.2% -1.9% -11.5% Operatingmargin %(non-IFRS) -1.6% -7.1% -1.2% -0.9% -6.3% HERE7 Net sales 211 265 -20 % 233 -9 % 660 825 -20 % Operatingprofit 14 -56 -89 -172 -245 Operatingprofit(non-IFRS) 20 37 -46 % 8 150 % 23 114 -80 % Operatingmargin % 6.6% -21.1% -38.2% -26.1% -29.7% Operatingmargin %(non-IFRS) 9.5% 14.0% 3.4% 3.5% 13.8% NokiaSolutions andNetworks7 Net salesMobile 2 592 3 501 -26 % 2 781 -7 % 8 177 9 791 -16 % Broadbandnet salesGlobal 1 259  1 625 -23 % 1 281 -2 % 3 784  4 267 -11 % Services netsales 1 331  1 701 -22 % 1 459 -9 %  4 213 4 950 -15 % Operatingprofit 166 183 -9 % 8 177 -1 047 Operatingprofit(non-IFRS) 218 324 -33 % 328 -34 % 742 206 260 % Operatingmargin % 6.4% 5.2% 0.3% 2.2% -10.7% Operatingmargin %(non-IFRS) 8.4% 9.3% 11.8% 9.1% 2.1%

Note 1 relating to results information and non-IFRS (also referred to as "underlying") results: The results information in this interim report is unaudited.  In addition to information on their reported IFRS results, they provide inevitable information on a non-IFRS, or underlying traffic performance, basis. Non-IFRS results exclude every material special items for every periods. In addition, non-IFRS results exclude intangible asset amortization, other purchase charge accounting related items and inventory value adjustments arising from (i) the formation of NSN and (ii) every traffic acquisitions completed after June 30, 2008. Nokia believes that their non-IFRS results provide meaningful supplemental information to both management and investors regarding Nokia`s underlying traffic performance by excluding the above-described items that may not live indicative of Nokia`s traffic operating results. These non-IFRS fiscal measures should not live viewed in isolation or as substitutes to the equivalent IFRS measure(s), but should live used in conjunction with the most directly comparable IFRS measure(s) in the reported results. survey note 2 below for information about the exclusions from their non-IFRS results. More information, including a reconciliation of their Q3 2013 and Q3 2012 non-IFRS results to their reported results, can live organize in their complete Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report with tables on pages 24-25 and 27-32. A reconciliation of their Q2 2013 non-IFRS results to their reported results can live organize in their complete Q2 interim report with tables on pages 19 and 21-25 published on July 18, 2013.

Note 2 relating to non-IFRS exclusions:

Q3 2013 - EUR 97 million (net) consisting of:- EUR 39 million restructuring freight and other associated items in Nokia Solutions and Networks.- EUR 3 million restructuring freight in HERE- EUR 15 million restructuring freight in Devices & Services- EUR 5 million restructuring related impairments in Devices & Services- EUR 18 million of transaction costs related to the proposed sale of Devices & Services traffic to Microsoft.- EUR 13 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the acquisition of Motorola Solutions` networks assets- EUR 3 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the acquisition of NAVTEQ- EUR 1 million of intangible assets amortization and other purchase charge related items arising from the acquisition of Novarra, MetaCarta and Motally in Devices & Services

Q3 2013 taxes - EUR 33 million net tax expenses on prior year operations offset by inevitable tax benefits related to previous year`s earnings

Q2 2013 - EUR 418 million (net) consisting of:- EUR 157 million restructuring freight and other associated items in NSN.- EUR 151 million losses related to divestments of businesses in NSN.- EUR 10 million restructuring freight in HERE- EUR 12 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the acquisition of Motorola Solutions` networks assets- EUR 87 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the acquisition of NAVTEQ- EUR 1 million of intangible assets amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the acquisition of Novarra, MetaCarta and Motally in Devices & Services

Q3 2012 - EUR 654 million (net) consisting of:- EUR 74 million restructuring freight and other associated items in NSN, including EUR 3 million of net charges related to country and contract exits based on original strategy that focuses on key markets and product segments.- EUR 2 million restructuring freight in HERE- EUR 454 million restructuring freight in Devices & Services- EUR 35 million positive particular from a cartel pretense settlement in Devices & Services- EUR 67 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the formation of NSN and the acquisition of Motorola Solutions` networks assets- EUR 91 million of intangible asset amortization and other purchase charge accounting related items arising from the acquisition of NAVTEQ- EUR 1 million of intangible assets amortization and other purchase charge related items arising from the acquisition of Novarra, MetaCarta and Motally in Devices & Services

Q3 2012 taxes - EUR 157 million non-cash deferred tax expense related to legal reorganizations arising from HERE traffic integration.

Note 3 relating to changes to historical comparative financials due to revised IFRS accounting standard, IAS19 Employee Benefits: The historical comparative financials presented in the interim report involve inevitable changes to previously reported information. These changes result from the retrospective application of a revised IFRS accounting touchstone IAS19, Employee Benefits and mainly relate to consolidated statements of comprehensive income and fiscal position. For more information on the adjustments between the previously reported information and the adjusted information, gratify survey the related disclosure starting on page 39 of the complete Q1 2013 interim report with tables published on April 18, 2013.

Note 4 relating to January-September 2013 results: Further information about the results for the age from January 1 to September 30, 2013 can live organize on pages 22-23, 25, 33-34 and 37-38 of the complete Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report with tables.

Note 5 relating to non-IFRS Nokia EPS: Nokia taxes were unfavorably impacted by Devices & Services taxes as no tax benefits are recognized for inevitable Devices & Services deferred tax items. If Nokia`s earlier estimated long-term tax rate of 26% had been applied, non-IFRS Nokia EPS would suffer been approximately 2.2 Euro cent higher in Q3 2013. Going forward on a non-IFRS basis, until a pattern of tax profitability is reestablished in Finland, Nokia expects to record quarterly tax expense of approximately EUR 50 million related to its Devices & Services traffic and approximately EUR 50 million related to its NSN business. Nokia expects to continue to record taxes related to its HERE traffic at a 26% rate.

Note 6 relating to Nokia net cash and other liquid assets: Calculated as total cash and other liquid assets less interest-bearing liabilities. For selected information on Nokia Group interest-bearing liabilities, gratify survey the table on pages 46-47 of the complete Q3 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report with tables.

Note 7 relating to operational and reporting structure: They suffer three businesses: Devices & Services, HERE and Nokia Solutions and Networks (formerly Nokia Siemens Networks), likewise known as NSN, and five operating and reportable segments: Smart Devices and Mobile Phones within Devices & Services;  HERE; Mobile Broadband and Global Services within NSN. Smart Devices focuses on smartphones and Mobile Phones focuses on mass market mobile devices, including Asha full-touch smartphones. Devices & Services likewise contains Devices & Services Other, which includes net sales of their frill phone traffic Vertu through October 12, 2012, spare parts and related cost of sales and operating expenses, as well as intellectual property (IPR) income and common research and progress expenses. In October 2012, they completed the divestment of Vertu to EQT VI, a European private equity firm. Nokia has signed an agreement on September 2, 2013 to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic to Microsoft. Starting with the fourth quarter of 2013, and topic to shareholder approval at their EGM, Nokia expects to report substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic as discontinued operations. HERE focuses on the progress of location-based services and local commerce. They introduced HERE as the original brand for their location and mapping service in November 2012. As of January 1, 2013, their Location & Commerce traffic and reportable segment was renamed HERE. NSN is one of the leading global providers of telecommunications infrastructure hardware, software and services, with the focus on the mobile broadband market. NSN includes two reportable segments, Mobile Broadband and Global Services. Mobile Broadband provides mobile operators with radio and core network software together with the hardware needed to deliver mobile voice and data services. Global Services provides mobile operators with a broad ambit of services, including professional services, network implementation and customer confidence services. NSN likewise contains NSN Other, which includes net sales and related cost of sales and operating expenses of Non-core businesses as well as Optical Networks through May 6, 2013 when its divestment was completed. On August 7, 2013, Nokia completed the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks. In accordance with this transaction, the Siemens title is being phased out from Nokia Siemens Networks` company title and branding. The original title and brand is Nokia Solutions and Networks, likewise referred to as NSN, which is being used likewise for fiscal reporting purposes. Until the quit of the second quarter 2013, NSN has been reported as a unique reportable segment for Nokia fiscal reporting purposes.

Note 8 relating to middling selling prices (ASP): Mobile device ASP represents total Devices & Services net sales (Smart Devices net sales, Mobile Phones net sales, and Devices & Services Other net sales) divided by total Devices & Services volumes. Devices & Services Other net sales includes net sales of Nokia`s frill phone traffic Vertu through October 12, 2012, spare parts, as well as intellectual property income. Smart Devices ASP represents Smart Devices net sales divided by Smart Devices volumes. Mobile Phones ASP represents Mobile Phones net sales divided by Mobile Phones volumes. As IPR income is included in Devices & Services Other net sales, they provide their total mobile device ASP both including and excluding IPR income. The mobile device ASP excluding IPR income in the third quarter 2013 was EUR 43, up 5% from EUR 41 in the third quarter 2012 and up 2% from EUR 42 in the second quarter 2013.

NOKIA OUTLOOK

- Nokia expects NSN`s non-IFRS operating margin in the fourth quarter 2013 to live approximately positive 12 percent, plus or minus four percentage points. This outlook is based on Nokia`s expectations regarding a number of factors, including:

- competitive industry dynamics;- product and regional mix;- industry seasonality;- the timing of major original network deployments; and- expected continued improvement under NSN`s restructuring and transformation programs.

- In the fourth quarter 2013, Nokia expects NSN to deliver solid net sales growth on a sequential basis, supported by stout industry seasonality.- Nokia continues to target to reduce NSN`s non-IFRS annualized operating expenses and production overheads by more than EUR 1.5 billion by the quit of 2013, compared to the quit of 2011.- Nokia has signed an agreement to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic to Microsoft. Commencing the fourth quarter 2013, and topic to shareholder approval of the transaction at their EGM, Nokia expects to report substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic as discontinued operations. In the fourth quarter 2013, Nokia expects the discontinued operations related to the Devices & Services traffic to generate negative operating margin on a non-IFRS basis.- Nokia continues to target to reduce its Devices & Services non-IFRS operating expenses to an annualized Run rate of approximately EUR 3.0 billion by the quit of 2013.

NSN STANDALONE INTERIM REPORT TO live PUBLISHED TODAY - As previously announced, as a result of the debt securities NSN issued in March 2013, NSN is committed to making inevitable fiscal data publicly available through its standalone reporting format. Consequently, NSN likewise plans to publish its standalone third quarter 2013 and January-September 2013 interim report on today at approximately 1.30pm Finnish time. - The report will likewise live made available on NSN`s website at: www.nsn.com/about-us/company/financial/financial-results. The reported fiscal results presented on a standalone basis by NSN may vary from those reported by Nokia due to the treatment of discontinued operations and inevitable accounting presentation differences. In addition, the presentation of underlying traffic performance information by Nokia and NSN differs due to presentation differences adopted by Nokia (non-IFRS information) and NSN (information before specific items) and the items excluded by each in their respective presentations.

NOKIA TO SELL DEVICES & SERVICES TO MICROSOFT IN EUR 5.44 BILLION ALL-CASH TRANSACTION

On September 3, 2013, Nokia Corporation announced that it had signed an agreement to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic and license its patents to Microsoft for EUR 5.44 billion in cash, payable at closing. Nokia expects to engage a net gain on sale of approximately EUR 3.0 billion, and expects the transaction to live significantly accretive to earnings.

The transaction is topic to inevitable purchase charge adjustments, protecting both Nokia and Microsoft. Based on Devices & Services` fiscal performance in the third quarter of 2013 as well as their expectations for Devices & Services` fiscal performance through the quit of the first quarter 2014, they currently await that the purchase charge adjustments related to net working capital and aggregate cash earnings would live approximately zero. Therefore they await that the total purchase charge will live EUR 5.44 billion as announced earlier.

The transaction is expected to nearby in the first quarter of 2014, topic to approval by Nokia shareholders, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions. At closing, approximately 32 000 people are expected to transfer to Microsoft, including approximately 4 700 people in Finland. Nokia will retain its headquarters in Finland. Of the Devices & Services related assets, Nokia`s CTO (Chief Technology Office) organization and patent portfolio will remain within the Nokia Group. The operations that are planned to live transferred to Microsoft generated an estimated EUR 14.9 billion, or almost 50%, of Nokia`s net sales for the complete year 2012.

In connection with the transaction, Nokia will grant Microsoft a 10 year non-exclusive license to its patents as of the time of the closing, and Microsoft will grant Nokia reciprocal rights related to HERE services. In addition, Nokia will grant Microsoft an option to extend this mutual patent license agreement to perpetuity. Of the total purchase charge of EUR 5.44 billion, EUR 3.79 billion relates to the purchase of substantially every of the Devices & Services business, and EUR 1.65 billion relates to the 10 year mutual patent license agreement and the option to extend this agreement to perpetuity.

Additionally, Microsoft will become a strategic licensee of the HERE platform, and will separately pay Nokia for a four year license. This revenue stream is expected to substantially replace the revenue stream HERE is currently receiving from Nokia`s Devices & Services traffic internally. If the transaction closes Microsoft is expected to become one of the top three customers of HERE.

Microsoft agreed to fabricate immediately available to Nokia EUR 1.5 billion of financing in the figure of three EUR 500 million tranches of convertible bonds to live issued by Nokia maturing in 5, 6 and 7 years, respectively. On September 6, 2013, Nokia announced that it had decided to draw down every of this financing to prepay financing raised for the acquisition of the shares in NSN which was completed in August 2013 and for generic corporate purposes. Microsoft has agreed not to sell any of the bonds or transfigure any of the bonds to Nokia shares prior to the closing of the sale of the Devices & Services business. If the sale of the Devices & Services traffic is completed, the bonds will live redeemed and the principal amount and accrued interest netted against the proceeds from the transaction.

Following the transaction, Nokia plans to focus on its three established businesses, each of which is a leader in enabling mobility in its respective market segment: NSN, a leader in network infrastructure and services; HERE, a leader in mapping and location services; and Advanced Technologies, which will build on several of Nokia`s current CTO and intellectual property rights activities. At closing, this transaction is expected to provide a solid basis for future investment in these three businesses. The transaction is likewise expected to significantly strengthen Nokia`s fiscal position and Nokia targets to recrudesce to being an investment grade company.

Nokia`s Board of Directors is conducting a strategy evaluation for Nokia Group between signing and closing of the transaction. This evaluation will comprise of evaluations of strategies for each of Nokia`s three businesses and practicable synergies between them, as well as an evaluation of the optimal corporate and capital structure for Nokia after the closing of the transaction. After this evaluation is complete, deemed excess capital is planned to live distributed to shareholders.

Under the terms of the agreement, the closing of the transaction will live topic to approval by Nokia shareholders. Nokia plans to hold an Extraordinary generic Meeting on November 19, 2013 and has published a notice of the meeting and made available more information on the transaction and its background. This information can live organize at www.nokia.com/gm.

Nokia`s Board of Directors recommends that Nokia shareholders vote to confirm and sanction the sale of the Devices & Services traffic at the Extraordinary generic Meeting.

The Devices & Services traffic has not been presented as discontinued operations in the third quarter 2013 as the transaction is topic to shareholder approval at their Extraordinary generic Meeting combined with the fact that Nokia`s shareholder base is widely distributed. Commencing the fourth quarter 2013, Nokia Group expects to report substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic as discontinued operations.

NOKIA COMPLETES THE ACQUISITION OF SIEMENS` STAKE IN NOKIA SIEMENS NETWORKS

On August 7, 2013, Nokia announced that it had completed the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks. The transaction was originally announced on July 1, 2013.

In accordance with this transaction, the Siemens title is being phased out from Nokia Siemens Networks` company title and branding. The original title and brand is Nokia Solutions and Networks, likewise referred to as NSN.

Rajeev Suri continues as CEO and Jesper Ovesen continues as Executive Chairman of the NSN Board of Directors. The NSN Board of Directors has been adjusted to the original ownership structure as the Siemens-appointed directors suffer resigned.

To date, NSN has been reported as a unique reportable segment for Nokia fiscal reporting purposes. During the third quarter 2013, Nokia acquired Siemens` stake in NSN and as a result, NSN is a wholly owned subsidiary of Nokia. Consequently, nascence with this interim report, Nokia reports fiscal information for two operating and reportable segments within NSN, Mobile Broadband and Global Services, which reflects how Nokia management is reviewing the NSN fiscal information following the completion of the transaction.

THIRD QUARTER 2013 fiscal AND OPERATING DISCUSSION

NOKIA GROUP

See note 7 to their Summary fiscal Information table above concerning their current operational and reporting structure and note 3 concerning inevitable changes to historical comparative financials due to a revised IFRS accounting standard, IAS19 Employee Benefits. The following discussion includes information on a non-IFRS, or underlying traffic performance, basis. survey notes 1 and 2 to their Summary fiscal Information table above for information about their underlying non-IFRS results and the non-IFRS exclusions for the periods discussed below.

The following table sets forth the year-on-year and sequential growth rates in their net sales on a reported basis and at constant currency for the periods indicated.

THIRD QUARTER 2013 NET SALES,REPORTED & CONSTANT CURRENCY1   YoY Change QoQ Change Group net sales - reported -22 % -1 % Group net sales - constant currency1 -18 % 1 % Devices & Servicesnet sales - reported -19 % 6 % Devices & Servicesnet sales - constant currency1 -16 % 9 % Here net sales - reported -20 % -9 % Here net sales - constant currency1 -18 % -9 % NSN net sales - reported -26 % -7 % NSN net sales - constant currency1 -21 % -5 %

Note 1: Change in net sales at constant currency excludes the impact of changes in exchange rates in comparison to the Euro, their reporting currency.

At constant currency Nokia Group`s net sales would suffer decreased 18% year-on-year and increased 1% sequentially.

The following table sets forth Nokia Group`s reported cash current for the periods indicated and fiscal position at the quit of the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

NOKIA GROUP CASH FLOWAND fiscal POSITION EUR million Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net cash fromoperating activities 9 -429 -196 NSN contribution (approximate) 190 320 -41 % 90 111 % Total cash andother liquid assets 9 134 8 779 4 % 9 453 -3 % NSN contribution 2 656 2 034 31 % 2 519 5 % Net cash andother liquid assets1 2 413 3 564 -32 % 4 067 -41 % NSN contribution 1 536 613 151 % 1 446 6 %

Note 1: Total cash and other liquid assets minus interest-bearing liabilities.

If the transaction to sell Microsoft substantially every of their Devices & Services traffic would suffer closed before the quit of the third quarter 2013, Nokia would suffer ended the quarter with monstrous cash of approximately EUR 13 billion and net cash of approximately EUR 7.5 billion. Additionally, assuming repayment of Nokia`s interest bearing debt of approximately EUR 2 billion maturing in February 2014, Nokia would suffer ended the third quarter 2013 with monstrous cash of approximately EUR 11 billion and net cash of approximately EUR 7.5 billion. This compares to reported monstrous cash of EUR 9.1 billion and net cash of EUR 2.4 billion at the quit of the third quarter 2013.

In the third quarter 2013, Nokia Group total cash and other liquid assets decreased sequentially by EUR 319 million and Nokia Group net cash and other liquid assets decreased sequentially by EUR 1.7 billion.

The items below are the primary drivers of the decrease in Nokia Group net cash and other liquid assets in the third quarter 2013 of EUR 1.7 billion:- Nokia Group smooth net profit adjusted for non-cash items of positive EUR 241 million;- Nokia Group smooth outflow related to the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks of EUR 1.7 billion;- Nokia Group smooth net working capital-related cash outflows of approximately EUR 160 million, which included approximately EUR 170 million of restructuring related cash outflows;

- Nokia Group excluding NSN smooth net working capital-related outflows of approximately EUR 60 million, which included approximately EUR 30 million of restructuring-related cash outflows. Excluding the restructuring-related cash outflows, Nokia Group excluding NSN smooth net working capital-related outflows of approximately EUR 30 million is primarily due to an extend in receivables and inventories, partially offset by an extend in interest free short term liabilities.- NSN smooth net working capital-related outflows of approximately EUR 100 million, which included approximately EUR 140 million of restructuring-related cash outflows. Excluding the restructuring-related cash outflows, NSN smooth net working capital-related inflows of approximately EUR 40 million is primarily due to a reduction of receivables, partially offset by an extend in inventories and decrease in interest free short-term liabilities;

- Nokia Group smooth net fiscal income and expense-related cash inflow of approximately EUR 70 million,- Nokia Group smooth cash tax net outflows of approximately EUR 140 million;- Nokia Group smooth capital expenditure of approximately EUR 70 million;- Nokia Group smooth proceeds related to distributions from unlisted venture funds, of approximately EUR 60 million;- Nokia Group smooth proceeds related to the equity component of the Microsoft convertible bond of approximately EUR 150 million; and- Nokia Group smooth negative odd exchange impact from translation of net cash of approximately EUR 50 million.

In the third quarter 2013, they received a quarterly platform back payment of USD 250 million (approximately EUR 190 million) from Microsoft. Their agreement with Microsoft includes platform back payments from Microsoft to us as well as software royalty payments from us to Microsoft. Under the terms of the agreement governing the platform back payments, the amount of each quarterly platform back payment is USD 250 million. They suffer a competitive software royalty structure, which includes annual minimum software royalty commitments that vary over the life of the agreement. Software royalty payments, with minimum commitments are paid quarterly. The platform back payments and minimum software royalty commitment payments will continue until the proposed sale of substantially every of their Devices & Services traffic to Microsoft closes.

In the third quarter 2013, they recognized a gain of EUR 50 million in Corporate Common other operating income and expenses due to a distribution from an unlisted venture fund related to the disposal of the fund`s investment in Waze Ltd. On September 30, 2013 Nokia had investments of EUR 432 million in unlisted funds that fabricate similar investments, reported under Non-current assets, Available-for-sale investments.

As a consequence of the purchase agreement whereby Nokia will sell substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic to Microsoft, as well as Nokia`s acquisition of the Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks, they concluded that there were sufficient indicators to require Nokia Group to achieve its annual goodwill impairment assessment as of September 30, 2013. As a result of the noted transactions, the Group reviewed the structure of its cash generating units for the purposes of the goodwill impairment assessment. The Group`s cash generating units in the impairment assessment were defined as Devices & Services, HERE, NSN Global Services and NSN Mobile Broadband.  As of September 30, 2013, goodwill of EUR 1 417 million, EUR 3 219 million, EUR 91 million and EUR 88 million was allocated to Devices & Services, HERE, NSN Global Services and NSN Mobile Broadband, respectively.

While methodology and models used in the impairment assessment with respect to HERE and NSN cash generating units are consistent with those used in the annual assessment performed during the fourth quarter of 2012, the Devices & Services cash generating unit recoverable value was performed using the impartial value less costs to sell based on the agreed purchase charge defined in the Microsoft purchase agreement, excluding any consideration attributable to patents and patent applications. Previously, a discounted cash current analysis with value in utilize basis was utilized to derive the estimated recoverable values for Smart Devices and Mobile Phones cash generating units. Inputs to the valuation models utilized for HERE, NSN Global Services and NSN Mobile Broadband cash generating units, such as cash flows, discount rates and growth rates, suffer been updated to reflect their most recent projections. Management does not await that the parameters used and results of the impairment assessment would materially change during the fourth quarter 2013.

There was no goodwill impairment freight recorded during the third quarter 2013 as a result of the goodwill impairment assessment, however an adverse change in any of the key assumptions used in measuring the recoverable value of their HERE traffic could suffer resulted in goodwill impairment as the current carrying value of this cash generating unit is only slightly lower than its` recoverable value. While they believe the estimated recoverable values are reasonable, actual performance in the short-term and long-term could live materially different from their forecasts, which could impact future estimates of recoverable value of their reporting units and may result in impairment charges.

During third quarter 2013, Nokia Group likewise performed as a result of the above mentioned two transactions an assessment of the potential recoverability of deferred tax assets currently topic to valuation allowance. The entity recognizes a deferred tax asset arising from unused losses or tax credits only to the extent there is convincing evidence that losses or unused tax credits can live utilized in the future. Positive evidence of future taxable profits, both including and excluding Devices & Services business, may live assigned lesser weight in assessing the appropriateness of recording a deferred tax asset when there is other unfavorable evidence, such as history of cumulative Finnish losses in Devices & Services and NSN business. While no deferred tax assets were recognized for Finnish tax losses and other temporary differences, Nokia Group has at the quit of the third quarter 2013 in total approximately EUR 2.7 billion (calculated at 24.5% tax rate) of net deferred tax assets which suffer not been recognized in the fiscal statements. The majority of Nokia`s Finnish deferred tax assets are indefinite in nature and available against future Finnish tax liabilities. There is a draft Government proposal to reduce the Finnish corporate tax rate to 20% from January 1, 2014 which would correspondingly reduce the amount of any recognizable net deferred tax assets in the future.

DEVICES & SERVICES

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for their Devices & Services traffic for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

DEVICES & SERVICESRESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million)1 2 898 3 563 -19 % 2 724 6 % Mobile device volume(million units) 64.6 82.9 -22 % 61.1 6 % Mobile device ASP (EUR) 45 43 5 % 45 Non-IFRS monstrous margin (%) 23.2 % 18.5 % 24.4 % Non-IFRS operatingexpenses (EUR million) 707 904 -22 % 696 2 % Non-IFRS operatingmargin (%) -1.6 % -7.1 % -1.2 % Operating margin (%) -3.0 % -18.9 % -1.2 %

Note 1: Includes IPR income recognized in Devices & Services Other net sales.

The year-on-year and sequential changes in their Devices & Services net sales, volumes, middling selling prices and monstrous margin are discussed below under their Smart Devices and Mobile Phones traffic units.

Smartphone Volumes In the third quarter 2013, Devices & Services total smartphone volumes increased sequentially to 14.7 million units, compared to 11.7 million units in the second quarter 2013, composed of: - 8.8 million Lumia smartphones in Smart Devices- 5.9 million Asha full-touch smartphones in Mobile Phones

Devices & Services Other Year-on-year Devices & Services Other net sales of EUR 155 million were lower in the third quarter 2013, compared to EUR 221 million in the third quarter 2012, primarily due to the divestment of Vertu. Sequentially, Devices & Services Other net sales were approximately flat.

Within Devices & Services Other, they appraise that their current annual IPR income run-rate is approximately EUR 0.5 billion.

Channel Inventory They ended the third quarter 2013 within their bona fide 4 to 6 week channel inventory range.

Net Sales and Volumes by Geographic belt The following table sets forth the net sales for their Devices & Services traffic for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates, by geographic area. IPR income is allocated to the geographic areas contained in this chart.

DEVICES & SERVICES NET SALESBY GEOGRAPHIC AREA EUR million Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Europe 846 985 -14 % 818 3 % Middle East & Africa 428 682 -37 % 420 2 % Greater China 215 278 -23 % 232 -7 % Asia-Pacific 769 977 -21 % 683 13 % North America 214 36 494 % 123 74 % Latin America 426 605 -30 % 448 -5 % Total 2 898 3 563 -19 % 2 724 6 %

The following table sets forth the mobile device volumes for their Devices & Services traffic for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates, by geographic area.

DEVICES & SERVICES MOBILE DEVICEVOLUMES BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA million units Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Europe 13.2 16.8 -21 % 11.3 17 % Middle East & Africa 14.7 19.1 -23 % 16.6 -11 % Greater China 4.0 5.8 -31 % 4.1 -2 % Asia-Pacific 23.6 30.1 -22 % 20.2 17 % North America 1.4 0.3 367 % 0.5 180 % Latin America 7.7 10.8 -29 % 8.4 -8 % Total 64.6 82.9 -22% 61.1 6%

On a year-on-year basis, net sales decreased in every regions, except for North America. The largest year-on-year decline in net sales was in Middle East & Africa, followed by Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Europe and Greater China. In Middle East & Africa, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Europe and Greater China the year-on-year net sales declines were primarily due to lower sales in their Mobile Phones traffic unit. In North America, the year-on-year sales extend was primarily due to their Smart Devices traffic unit.

On a sequential basis, net sales increased in every regions except Latin America and Greater China. The largest sequential extend in net sales was in North America, followed by Asia-Pacific, Europe, and Middle East & Africa. In North America and Middle East & Africa, the sequential increases were primarily due to higher sales in their Smart Devices business. In Asia-Pacific and Europe the sequential sales increases were primarily due to higher sales in their Mobile Phones business. In Latin America the sequential sales decrease was primarily due to lower sales in their Mobile Phones traffic unit. In Greater China the sequential decrease was primarily due to lower sales in their Smart Devices traffic unit.

At constant currency Devices & Services` net sales would suffer decreased 16% year-on-year and increased 9% sequentially.

Non-IFRS Operating Expenses Devices & Services non-IFRS operating expenses decreased 22% year-on-year and increased 2% sequentially in the third quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, operating expenses related to Mobile Phones and Smart Devices decreased 34% and 6%, respectively, in the third quarter 2013. On a sequential basis, operating expenses related to Smart Devices increased 2% in the third quarter 2013, whereas operating expenses related to Mobile Phones decreased 2%. In addition to the factors described below, the year-on-year change was affected by the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being affected by the relative merge of sales and monstrous profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices. This resulted in higher and lower relative allocations to Smart Devices and Mobile Phones, respectively.

Devices & Services non-IFRS research and progress expenses decreased 22% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to reductions in inevitable Mobile Phones and Symbian-related activities, a lower cost base as a result of traffic divestments and overall cost controls. On a sequential basis, Devices & Services non-IFRS research and progress expenses increased 5% in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to lower accrued incentive expenses in the second quarter of 2013 consistent with Devices & Services traffic performance.

Devices & Services non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses decreased 20% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to lower personnel related expenses, a lower cost base as a result of traffic divestments and overall cost controls, partially offset by higher product-specific marketing in back of recently launched Lumia and Asha products. On a sequential basis, Devices & Services non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses were approximately flat in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to higher product-specific marketing in back of recently launched Lumia and Asha products offset by lower personnel related expenses.

Devices & Services non-IFRS administrative and generic expenses decreased 33% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013 and decreased 13% sequentially in the third quarter 2013. The year-on-year decrease was primarily related to a lower cost base as a result of traffic divestments and overall cost controls, partially offset by shared office cost categorization. The sequential decrease was primarily due to lower personnel related expenses.

Non-IFRS Operating Margin The higher year-on-year Devices & Services non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher monstrous margin and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales.

The sequentially lower Devices & Services non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a lower monstrous margin, partially offset by lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales compared to the second quarter 2013.

Devices & Services non-IFRS other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 12 million, an expense of EUR 2 million in the second quarter of 2013 and an expense of EUR 8 million in the third quarter 2012.

Operating Margin The higher year-on-year Devices & Services operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher monstrous margin and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales. In the third quarter 2013, other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 50 million, compared to an expense of EUR 427 million in the third quarter 2012.

The sequentially lower Devices & Services operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a lower monstrous margin, partially offset by lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales compared to the second quarter 2013. In the third quarter 2013, other income and expense was an expense of EUR 50 million, compared to an expense of EUR 2 million in the second quarter 2013.

Devices & Services other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 50 million, an expense of EUR 2 million in the second quarter of 2013 and an expense of EUR 427 million in the third quarter 2012. In the third quarter 2013, on a year-on-year basis, Devices & Services reported other income and expense had a positive impact on profitability due to a lower amount of restructuring-related charges and associated items. In the third quarter 2013, on a sequential basis, Devices & Services reported other income and expense had a negative impact on profitability due to transaction costs related to the proposed sale of substantially every of their Devices & Services business, higher amount of restructuring-related charges and associated items.

Cost Reduction Activities and Planned Operational Adjustments The following table sets forth a summary of their Devices & Services cost reduction activities and planned operational adjustments.

DEVICES & SERVICES RESTRUCTURING SUMMARY EUR (million) Q3/2013 (approximate) Cumulative up to  Q3/2013 (approximate) Q4/2013 (approximate estimate) 2013 (approximate estimate Total (approximate estimate) Restructuring related charges 20 1 450 Not provided Not provided 1 500 Restructuring related cash outflows 30 1 300 20 200 1 350

Nokia continues to target to reduce its Devices & Services non-IFRS operating expenses to an annualized Run rate of approximately EUR 3.0 billion by the quit of 2013.

At the quit of the third quarter 2013, Devices & Services and Corporate Common had approximately 32 200 employees, a reduction of approximately 6 100 compared to the quit of the third quarter 2012, and an extend of approximately 800 compared to the quit of the second quarter 2013.

By the quit of the third quarter 2013, they had recorded cumulative Devices & Services restructuring-related charges and other associated items of approximately EUR 1.45 billion. In total, they continue to await cumulative Devices & Services restructuring-related charges of approximately EUR 1.5 billion before the quit of 2013.

By the quit of the third quarter 2013, Devices & Services had cumulative restructuring-related cash outflows of approximately EUR 1.3 billion. Of the total expected charges relating to restructuring activities of approximately EUR 1.5 billion, they continue to await Devices & Services non-cash charges to live approximately EUR 150 million.

SMART DEVICES

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for their Smart Devices traffic unit for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

SMART DEVICES RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million)1 1 254 976 28 % 1 164 8 % Smart Devices volume(million units) 8.8 6.3 40 % 7.4 19 % Smart Devices ASP (EUR) 143 155 -8 % 157 -9 % Gross margin (%) 16.4% -3.5% 21.1 % Operating expenses(EUR million)2 415 441 -6 % 406 2 % Contribution margin (%)2 -17.1 % -48.9 % -14.1 %

Note 1: Does not involve IPR income. IPR income is recognized in Devices & Services Other net sales.Note 2: The year-on-year changes in operating expenses were affected by the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being affected by the relative merge of sales and monstrous profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices, resulting in higher relative allocations to Smart Devices in the second and third quarters of 2013. Accordingly, third quarter 2013 operating expenses are not directly comparable to third quarter 2012 operating expenses.

Net SalesBoth year-on-year and sequentially, the extend in their Smart Devices net sales in the third quarter 2013 was due to higher volumes, partially offset by lower ASPs.

Volume The year-on-year extend in their Smart Devices volumes in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to higher Lumia volumes, partially offset by lower Symbian volumes. Symbian volumes decreased from 3.5 million units in the third quarter 2012 to approximately zero in the third quarter 2013. Their Lumia volumes increased from 2.9 million in the third quarter 2012 to 8.8 million in the third quarter 2013.

On a sequential basis, the extend in their Smart Devices volumes in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to the Lumia 520.

Average Selling charge The year-on-year decrease in their Smart Devices ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower recognition of deferred revenue related to services sold in combination with their devices and lower sales of accessories, partially offset by a positive merge shift towards sales of their Lumia products which carry a higher ASP than their Symbian products and the net positive result of odd currency fluctuations.

Sequentially, the decrease in their Smart Devices ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to their pricing actions, lower recognition of deferred revenue on services sold in combination with their devices and the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations, partially offset by a positive merge shift towards the Lumia 1020 which started to ship in the third quarter 2013 and the Lumia 925 which started to ship in the second quarter 2013.

Gross Margin The significant year-on-year extend in their Smart Devices monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a positive merge shift towards sales of their Lumia products which carry a higher monstrous margin than their Symbian products as well as inventory-related allowances. Specifically, regarding inventory-related allowances, in the third quarter 2013, Smart Devices monstrous margin was negatively affected by approximately EUR 20 million of net allowances related to excess component inventory and future purchase commitments. In the third quarter 2012, Smart Devices monstrous margin was negatively impacted by approximately EUR 120 million of net allowances related to excess component inventory, future purchase commitments and an inventory revaluation. In the third quarter 2013, the year-on-year extend in their Smart Devices monstrous margin was likewise due to lower fixed costs per unit because of higher sales volumes. The year-on-year extend in their Smart Devices monstrous margin was partially offset by higher warranty costs in the third quarter 2013 due to the reversal of previously recognized warranty costs in the third quarter 2012 related to their Symbian devices.

On a sequential basis, the decrease in their Smart Devices monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to inventory-related allowances. Specifically, in the third quarter 2013, Smart Devices monstrous margin was negatively affected by approximately EUR 20 million of excess component inventory and future purchase commitments, whereas in the second quarter 2013 their Smart Devices monstrous margin benefited from the reversal of approximately EUR 20 million of previously recognized excess component inventory and future purchase commitments.

Increases or decreases to Smart Devices inventory-related allowances may live required in the future depending on several factors, including consumer exact and continued ramp-up, particularly related to their original Lumia products.

MOBILE PHONES

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for their Mobile Phones traffic unit for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

MOBILE PHONES RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million)1 1 489 2 366 -37 % 1 405 6 % Mobile Phones volume (million units) 55.8 76.6 -27 % 53.7 4 % Mobile Phones ASP (EUR) 27 31 -13 % 26 4 % Gross margin (%) 21.5 % 21.7 % 19.5% Operating expenses (EUR million)2 260 393 -34 % 266 -2 % Contribution margin (%)2 3.6 % 4.9 % 0.2%

Note 1: Does not involve IPR income. IPR income is recognized in Devices & Services Other net sales.Note 2: The year-on-year changes in operating expenses were affected by the allocation of operating expenses being affected by the relative merge of sales and monstrous profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices, resulting in lower relative allocations to Mobile Phones in the second and third quarters of 2013. Accordingly, third quarter 2013 operating expenses are not directly comparable to third quarter 2012 operating expenses.

Net Sales On a year-on-year basis, the decline in their Mobile Phones net sales in the third quarter 2013 was due to lower volumes and lower ASPs. On a sequential basis, the extend in their Mobile Phones net sales in the third quarter 2013 was due to higher ASPs and higher volumes.

Volume During the third quarter 2013 they shipped 55.8 million Mobile Phones units, of which 5.9 million were Asha full-touch smartphones.

On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones volumes in the third quarter 2013 were negatively affected by competitive industry dynamics, including fierce competition at the low quit of their product portfolio and fierce smartphone competition at increasingly lower charge points.

On a sequential basis, their Mobile Phones volumes in the third quarter 2013 were positively affected by solid performance across the majority of their product portfolio due to recently launched devices, in particular the Nokia 105, the Asha 501, and the Nokia 210.

Average Selling charge The year-on-year decline in their Mobile Phones ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher balance of sales of lower priced devices as well as generic charge erosion and their pricing actions.

The sequential extend in their Mobile Phones ASP in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher balance of sales of higher priced devices, particularly the Asha 501. The sequential extend was partially offset by the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations, as well as generic charge erosion and their pricing actions.

Gross Margin On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was approximately flat. On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 benefitted from higher cost erosion than charge erosion. On a year-on-year basis, their Mobile Phones monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was negatively impacted by higher fixed costs per unit because of lower sales volumes as well as the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations.

On a sequential basis, the extend in their Mobile Phones monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher balance of higher monstrous margin devices, particularly the Asha 501 and the Nokia 210, and the net positive result of odd currency fluctuations, partially offset by higher warranty costs in the third quarter 2013, due to the reversal of previously recognized warranty costs in the second quarter 2013.

HERE

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for HERE for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

HERE RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million) 211 265 -20 % 233 -9 % External net sales (EUR million) 176 179 -2 % 195 -10 % Internal net sales (EUR million) 35 86 -59 % 38 -8 % Non-IFRS monstrous margin (%) 82.5 % 80.4 % 76.1 % Non-IFRS operatingexpenses (EUR million) 153 175 -13 % 169 -9 % Non-IFRS operatingmargin (%) 9.5 % 14.0 % 3.4 % Operating margin (%) 6.6 % -21.1 % -38.2 %

Net Sales In the third quarter 2013, the year-on-year decline in external HERE net sales was primarily due to the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations, lower sales to personal navigation device (PND) customers consistent with declines in the PND industry and a non-recurring sale of data in the third quarter 2012, partially offset by higher sales to vehicle customers and non-recurrence of a negative sales adjustment made in the third quarter 2012 related to historical license fees in the bona fide course of traffic for a particular customer. At constant currency, external HERE net sales would suffer grown on a year-on-year basis.

In the third quarter 2013, the sequential decline in external HERE net sales was primarily due to lower seasonal sales to vehicle customers and the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations.

In the third quarter 2013, HERE had sales of original vehicle licenses of 2.6 million units, compared to 2.1 million units in the third quarter 2012 and 2.7 million units in the second quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, unit sales to vehicle customers increased primarily due to higher adoption of in-vehicle navigation, whereas on a sequential basis unit sales to vehicle customers decreased primarily due to seasonality. Sales to vehicle customers represented well over 50% of external HERE net sales in the third quarter 2013, as well as in the third quarter 2012 and in the second quarter 2013.

In the third quarter 2013, the year-on-year and sequential declines in internal HERE net sales were primarily due to lower recognition of deferred revenue related to their Smart Devices traffic unit.

At constant currency HERE`s overall net sales would suffer decreased 18% year-on-year and 9% sequentially.

Non-IFRS monstrous Margin On a year-on-year basis, the extend in HERE non-IFRS monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher balance of external sales, which generally carry a higher monstrous margin, and lower costs related to service delivery.

On a sequential basis, the extend in HERE non-IFRS monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower sales of update units to vehicle customers, which generally carry a lower margin, and lower costs related to service delivery.

Non-IFRS Operating Expenses HERE non-IFRS research and progress expenses decreased 12% year-on-year due to cost reduction actions. On a sequential basis, research and progress expenses decreased 7% in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to lower personnel costs.

HERE non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses decreased 11% year-on-year due to cost reduction actions. On a sequential basis, sales and marketing expenses decreased 14% in the third quarter 2013, primarily due to lower travel and marketing expenses.

HERE non-IFRS generic and administrative expenses decreased 18% year-on-year primarily due to cost reduction actions. On a sequential basis, generic and administrative expenses decreased 22% in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to decreased expenses related to shared office cost categorization and lower personnel costs.

Non-IFRS Operating Margin The year-on-year decrease in HERE non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower internal net sales.

The sequential improvement in HERE non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to higher monstrous margin.

HERE non-IFRS other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 and 2012 and second quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 1 million.

Operating Margin In the third quarter 2013, HERE operating margin improved significantly to 6.6%, compared to negative 21.1% in the third quarter 2012, and negative 38.2% in the second quarter 2013. The year-on-year and sequential improvements in HERE operating margin in the third quarter 2013 were primarily due to the absence of significant purchase charge accounting-related items arising from the purchase of NAVTEQ, the vast majority of which had been fully amortized as of the quit second quarter 2013.

HERE other income and expense for the third quarter 2013 was an expense of EUR 4 million, an expense of EUR 11 million in the second quarter of 2013 and an expense of EUR 3 million in the third quarter 2012.

NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS

The following table sets forth a summary of the results for NSN and its reportable segments, Mobile Broadband and Global Services,  for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates.

NSN RESULTS SUMMARY   Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Net sales (EUR million) 2 592 3 501 -26 % 2 781 -7 % Mobile Broadband net sales (EUR million) 1 259 1 625 -23 % 1 281 -2 % Global Services net sales (EUR million) 1 331 1 701 -22 % 1 459 -9 % Non-IFRS monstrous margin (%) 36.6 % 32.2 % 38.3 % Non-IFRS operatingexpenses (EUR million) 732 796 -8 % 766 -4 % Non-IFRS operatingmargin (%) 8.4 % 9.3 % 11.8 %   Mobile Broadbandcontribution margin (%) 4.9 % 18.3 % 8.7 % Global Servicescontribution margin (%) 12.3 % 2.7 % 14.7 % Operating margin (%) 6.4 % 5.2 % 0.3 %

Net Sales The following table sets forth NSN net sales for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year and sequential growth rates, by geographic area.

NSN NET SALES BY GEOGRAPHIC AREA EUR million Q3/2013 Q3/2012 YoYChange Q2/2013 QoQChange Europe 701 918 -24 % 775 -10 % Middle East & Africa 247 325 -24 % 268 -8 % Greater China 278 313 -11 % 260 7 % Asia-Pacific 791 1 266 -38 % 784 1 % North America 299 285 5 % 348 -14 % Latin America 276 394 -30 % 346 -20 % Total 2 592 3 501 -26 % 2 781 -7 %

The year-on-year decrease of 26% in NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 was partially due to divestments of businesses not consistent with its strategic focus as well as the exiting of inevitable customer contracts and countries. Excluding these two factors, NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 declined by approximately 20% primarily due to reduced wireless infrastructure deployment activity, which affected both Mobile Broadband and Global Services, and the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations. The year-on-year decrease in Mobile Broadband was primarily due to lower sales in WCDMA, GSM and CDMA. Within Mobile Broadband, LTE was approximately flat year-on-year as higher sales in North America, Europe and Latin America offset lower sales in Japan and Korea. On a constant currency basis, LTE sales grew year-on-year. The year-on-year decrease in Global Services was primarily due to a reduction in network implementation activity, consistent with lower levels of large scale Mobile Broadband deployments, and the exiting of inevitable contracts in line with NSN`s strategic focus. On a regional basis, they had lower cyclical sales in Asia Pacific following towering levels of spending a year ago. In Europe, the year-on-year sales decline was primarily related to network modernization and divestments in line with their strategy. The year-on-year sales decline in Latin America was primarily driven by constrained operator spending and inevitable contract exits. Finally, the year-on-year decline in Middle East and Africa was primarily due to country exits.

The sequential decrease of 7% in NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 was partially due to the exiting of inevitable customer contracts and countries as well as the divestments of businesses not consistent with NSN`s strategic focus. Excluding these two factors, NSN net sales in the third quarter 2013 decreased by approximately 4%, primarily due to seasonality, which affected both Global Services and Mobile Broadband, and the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations. The sequential decrease in Global Services net sales was primarily due to lower sales in professional services and customer confidence services, partially offset by higher sales in network implementation activity. The slight sequential decrease in Mobile Broadband net sales was primarily due to lower seasonal sales. On a regional basis, NSN net sales decline was primarily due to Europe related to lower seasonal spending and Latin America related to lower investments from operators.

In the third quarter 2013, Global Services represented 51% of NSN net sales, compared to 49% in the third quarter 2012 and 52% in the second quarter 2013. In the third quarter 2013, Mobile Broadband represented 49% of NSN net sales, compared to 46% in the third quarter 2012 and 46% in the second quarter 2013.

At constant currency, NSN net sales would suffer decreased approximately 21% year-on-year and approximately 5% sequentially.

Non-IFRS monstrous Margin On a year-on-year basis, the extend in NSN non-IFRS monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a higher monstrous margin in Global Services related to significant efficiency improvements as a result of NSN`s restructuring program and the positive impact related to inevitable customer contract exits and the divestment of businesses which carried a lower monstrous margin, partially offset by a slightly lower monstrous margin in Mobile Broadband.

On a sequential basis, the decrease in NSN non-IFRS monstrous margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to lower monstrous margins in Global Services and Mobile Broadband and the absence of non-recurring IPR income of approximately EUR 20 million that was recognized in the second quarter 2013, partially offset by a better product merge due to a higher balance of Mobile Broadband net sales. The lower monstrous margin in Global Services was primarily driven by lower seasonal sales and the absence of the revenue triggered by inevitable project acceptances which was recognized in the second quarter 2013. The monstrous margin decline in Mobile Broadband was primarily due to costs incurred in anticipation of a technology shift to TD-LTE related to major projects in China and lower seasonal sales.

Non-IFRS Operating Expenses NSN non-IFRS research and progress expenses decreased 7% year-on-year in the third quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, non-IFRS research and progress expenses were lower primarily due to reduced investments in traffic activities that are not consistent with their focused strategy as well as increased research and progress efficiency, partially offset by higher investments in areas that are consistent with their focused strategy, most notably LTE. On a sequential basis, non-IFRS research and progress expenses were approximately flat in the third quarter 2013.

On a year-on-year and sequential basis, NSN non-IFRS sales and marketing expenses decreased 21% and 11% respectively in the third quarter 2013 primarily due to structural cost savings from their transformation and restructuring program.

NSN non-IFRS generic and administrative expenses increased 11% year-on-year and decreased 4% sequentially in the third quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, non-IFRS generic and administrative expenses were higher, primarily due to consultancy fees related to information technology and other projects.

Non-IFRS Operating Margin The year-on-year decrease in NSN non-IFRS operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to a lower contribution margin in Mobile Broadband, partially offset by a higher contribution margin in Global Services. On a year-on-year basis, the 13.4 percentage point decline in Mobile Broadband contribution margin was primarily due to higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales, and to a lesser extent by slightly lower monstrous margin. The year-on-year 9.6 percentage point extend in Global Services contribution margin was primarily due to higher monstrous margin and lower operating expenses as a percentage of net sales.

On a sequential basis non-IFRS operating margin decreased due to lower contribution margin for both Global Services and Mobile Broadband which declined by 2.4 and 3.8 percentage points respectively. The sequential decline in Global Services and Mobile Broadband contribution margin was primarily due to lower monstrous margin, and to a lesser extent, higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales.

NSN non-IFRS other income and expenses for the third quarter 2013 was income of EUR 1 million, compared to expense of EUR 8 million in the third quarter 2012, and income of EUR 30 million in the second quarter 2013. On a year-on-year basis, the change in non-IFRS other income and expenses was primarily due to a reduction in questionable account allowances, partially offset by the net negative result of odd currency fluctuations. On a sequential basis, the change was primarily due to positive impacts in the second quarter 2013 related to the gain on sale of true estate and the reduction in questionable account allowances.

Operating Margin The year-on-year extend in NSN operating margin in the third quarter 2013 was primarily due to higher monstrous margin, partially offset by higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales. NSN`s other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 38 million in the third quarter 2013, compared to an expense of EUR 95 million in the third quarter 2012.

On a sequential basis NSN operating margin increased primarily due to lower other expenses as a percentage of sales, partially offset by lower monstrous margin and higher operating expenses as a percentage of net sales. NSN`s other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 38 million in the third quarter 2013, compared to an expense of EUR 278 million in the second quarter 2013.

Global Restructuring Program The following table sets forth a summary of NSN cost reduction activities and planned operational adjustments.

NSN RESTRUCTURING SUMMARY EUR (million) Q3/2013 (approximate) Cumulative up to  Q3/2013 (approximate) Q4/2013 (approximate estimate) 2013 (approximate estimate 2014 (approximate estimate) Total (approximate estimate) Restructuring related charges 39 1 750 Not provided Not provided Not provided 1 800 Restructuring related cash outflows 140 1 100 200 650 300  1 600

NSN continues to target to reduce NSN` non-IFRS annualized operating expenses and production overheads by more than EUR 1.5 billion by the quit of 2013, compared to the quit of 2011. In conjunction with this restructuring program, NSN continues to appraise total restructuring related charges of approximately EUR 1.8 billion as well as total restructuring related cash outflows of approximately EUR 1.6 billion.

Non-cash charges and timing differences account for the differences between the above charges and the corresponding cash out-flows. Changes in estimates of timing or amounts of costs to live incurred and associated cash flows may become necessary as the transformation and restructuring program is implemented.

At the quit of the third quarter 2013, NSN had approximately 49 100 employees, a reduction of approximately 11 500 compared to the quit of the third quarter 2012, and approximately 1 400 compared to the quit of the second quarter 2013.

THIRD QUARTER 2013 OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS Operating highlights for previous quarters are available in the respective interim reports.

NOKIA GROUP HIGHLIGHTS

- On September 3, Nokia announced that it has signed an agreement to enter into a transaction whereby Nokia will sell substantially every of its Devices & Services traffic and license its patents to Microsoft for EUR 5.44 billion in cash. The transaction, which is topic to approval by Nokia`s shareholders, regulatory approvals and other customary closing conditions, is expected to nearby in the first quarter of 2014. To avoid the perception of any potential conflict of interest between now and the pending closure of the transaction with Microsoft, Stephen Elop stepped aside as President and CEO of Nokia Corporation, resigned from the Board of Directors, and continued to labor for Nokia as Executive Vice President, Devices & Services. Risto Siilasmaa assumed the interim CEO role for Nokia while continuing to serve in his role as Chairman of the Nokia Board of Directors, while Timo Ihamuotila became President of Nokia for the interim age while continuing to serve as CFO. Mr. Ihamuotila likewise assumed the responsibility of chairing the Nokia Leadership Team.- Nokia announced on September 3, 2013 that following the transaction with respect to its Devices & Services business, Nokia plans to focus on its three established businesses, each of which is a leader in enabling mobility in its respective market segment: NSN, a leader in network infrastructure and services; HERE, a leader in mapping and location services; and Advanced Technologies, which will build on several of Nokia`s current CTO and intellectual property rights activities. Additionally, Nokia announced that its Board of Directors is conducting a strategy evaluation for Nokia Group between signing and closing of the transaction. This evaluation will comprise of evaluations of strategies for each of Nokia`s three businesses and practicable synergies between them, as well as an evaluation of the optimal corporate and capital structure for Nokia after the closing of the transaction.- On August 7, Nokia announced that it had completed the acquisition of Siemens` stake in Nokia Siemens Networks. The transaction was originally announced on July 1, 2013. In accordance with this transaction, the Siemens title is being phased out from Nokia Siemens Networks` company title and branding. The original title and brand is Nokia Solutions and Networks, likewise referred to as NSN, which is being used likewise for fiscal reporting purposes. Nokia Solutions and Networks is wholly owned by Nokia and will continue to live consolidated by Nokia.- Nokia issued  EUR 1.5 billion of financing in the figure of three EUR 500 million tranches of convertible bonds issued to Microsoft maturing in 5, 6 and 7 years respectively. On September 6, 2013, Nokia announced that it had decided to draw down every of this financing to prepay financing raised for the acquisition of the shares in NSN which was completed in August 2013 and for generic corporate purposes. Microsoft has agreed not to sell any of the bonds or transfigure any of the bonds to Nokia shares prior to the closing of the sale of the Devices & Services business. If the sale of the Devices & Services traffic is completed, the bonds will live redeemed and the principal amount and accrued interest netted against the proceeds from the transaction. More information on the terms of the bonds can live organize in the releases issued by Nokia on September 6, 2013 and September 24, 2013.- Nokia ranked second within the Communications gear industry in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (World) released in September 2013. Nokia is likewise among companies that suffer achieved the largest proportional improvement in their sustainability performance within their sector.- The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) listed Nokia in the CDP Nordic 260 Climate Change Report 2013 (comprising 260 largest Nordic companies). Nokia is mentioned for the fifth year in a row in the Climate Disclosure Leadership Index, being the only Nordic company to suffer been featured in the index for two consecutive quarters.

DEVICES & SERVICES OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

- Nokia`s original manufacturing facility in Hanoi, Vietnam, became fully operational in Q3. The original site has been established to bear their most affordable Asha smartphones and feature phones.

SMART DEVICES

- Nokia introduced and started shipments of the Nokia Lumia 1020, the company`s original flagship in smartphones. Boasting a second generation 41 megapixel sensor, the Nokia Lumia 1020 sets a original benchmark in smartphone imaging. Unlike any smartphone in the market today the Nokia Lumia 1020 reinvents zoom, enabling people to discover more detail than the eye can see. With Nokia`s innovative PureView technology, including optical image stabilization, the device is able to bear some of the sharpest images practicable by any digital camera. In addition to the industry leading camera, the Nokia Lumia 1020 likewise comes with ad and subscription free Nokia Music streaming and leading maps and location experiences from HERE.- Nokia announced the Nokia Lumia 625, an accessibly priced 4G smartphone. With its 4.7-inch super-sensitive LCD screen, the Lumia 625 features the largest smartphone screen from Nokia available in shops today. The Nokia Lumia 625 likewise provides many innovations organize in the Nokia Lumia 1020, including a ambit of integrated camera applications fancy Nokia Smart Camera, offering handy features fancy removing unwanted objects from pictures, and Nokia Cinemagraph, which turns photos into living memories with added movement. The Lumia 625 likewise includes Nokia Music and HERE services.- Nokia`s Lumia ambit of smartphones continued to attract businesses, including Delta Air Lines which has chosen the Lumia 820 for its more than 19 000 flight attendants to utilize for on-board payments. In addition, Britvic Soft Drinks, one of the UK`s leading soft drinks companies, and Gi Group, a leading Italian multinational company dedicated to the human resources market, suffer chosen Nokia Lumia as their traffic smartphone.- Nokia started rolling out the Nokia Lumia Amber software update which delivers a wide ambit of original and improved features and apps, such as Nokia Glance Screen with the standby clock and an even better imaging undergo for Nokia Lumia owners.- The Windows Phone store continued to strengthen in terms of the quantity and character of applications. The Windows Phone Store today offers more than 175 000 applications and games.- Since the quit of the quarter, Nokia has unveiled three original Lumia devices alongside original accessories, Nokia experiences and third-party developer applications, including Instagram and Vine. The original devices Nokia introduced at Nokia World in Abu Dhabi were Nokia`s first ever Windows tablet, the Nokia Lumia 2520, and two large-screen Lumia smartphones: the Lumia 1520 and 1320.

MOBILE PHONES

- Nokia introduced a original ultra-affordable camera phone, the Nokia 108, with a suggested retail charge of around just EUR 22. faultless for people purchasing their first-ever camera phone, the original handsets present more than just calls and texts. The Nokia 108 likewise lets people pick pictures and record video, helping them capture life`s notable moments with an attractively-priced device.- Nokia unveiled and started shipments of the Nokia 515, a premium mobile phone with a 5 megapixel camera retailing at EUR 115. Wrapped in lightweight aluminum, the device combines the best of Nokia - contemporaneous design, towering character materials and top performance.- Nokia expanded its portfolio of highly affordable, 3G mobile phones by announcing and starting the shipments of the Nokia 207 and the Nokia 208. The Nokia 207 and Nokia 208 are designed for people who fancy a classic phone and traditional keypad but don`t want to miss out on smartphone experiences. The smart camera features of the Nokia 208 fabricate taking pictures more enjoyable, with voice-guided self-portrait, sequential shot and panorama mode giving people more prankish imaging options.- Since the quit of the quarter, Nokia has unveiled three original additions to the Asha Platform family of devices - the Nokia Asha 500, Asha 502 and Asha 503 - which connect the already successful Asha 501 in pushing the boundaries of affordable smartphone innovation.

HERE OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

During the third quarter 2013 HERE made significant progress towards its goal of becoming the leading location cloud traffic with the introduction of new, innovative products for the automotive industry, updates to its signature consumer experiences on Windows Phone and a number of original partnerships that demonstrate that HERE is the preferred colleague across industries for maps and location-based technology:

- HERE announced a complete Connected Driving offer, including HERE Auto, HERE Auto Cloud and HERE Auto Companion. It is the only end-to-end driving solution on the market today, which will aid car makers and in-vehicle technology suppliers connect the car to the cloud.- HERE has radically improved its traffic product, HERE Traffic, by structure a original system and engine that processes data even faster and more accurately than before.- HERE has teamed up with Mercedes-Benz to jointly develop smart maps for connected cars and ultimately, self-driving cars leveraging cloud technology. Connecting the car to the cloud is one of the biggest opportunities for the automotive industry today and the aptitude to compute real-time information on exact will develop an entirely original class of services for consumers.- Magneti Marelli is working with HERE to develop an end-to-end connected driving solution ready to utilize for car makers, based on Magneti Marelli`s open platform and the HERE Connected Driving offering.- Continental Corporation will implement 3D content from HERE in its original infotainment platform. Automotive manufactures can expand their location-based applications to involve rich 3D landmarks, satellite imagery with split screen and current traffic information. This likewise will forward the multi-mobile transportation concept another step by providing drivers the aptitude to synch their route profiles across in-dash systems in their vehicles and their smartphone, tablet or PC.- HERE updated its signature HERE suite of location experiences on Windows Phone. The updates involve an overview of traffic conditions as well as the introduction of My Commute for HERE Drive+, the introduction of a original feature for the augmented reality technology LiveSight in HERE Maps to let people halt and pick a closer examine at everything they find and browse in comfort, and a redesign of the user undergo of HERE Transit.- HERE announced the global release of HERE Drive+ for every Windows Phone 8 smartphones to extend the benefits of HERE Drive+ beyond Nokia Lumia devices to aid more people navigate their lives with ease and confidence. HERE Drive+ provides access to global world-class voice-guided turn-by-turn navigation with genuine offline maps, enabling people to attain their destination safely even without a data connection.- HERE delivers its indoor Venue Maps to Qualcomm Atheros, Inc., a subsidiary of Qualcomm Incorporated, helping Qualcomm IZat(TM) location technologies deliver more precise positioning to mobile devices inside buildings.- Garmin continues to do their confidence in HERE across the globe by recently adopting Natural Guidance in North America and Europe which enables guidance the artery that humans provide directions to each other. This includes leveraging local information and market research to incorporate local nuances for choosing and describing reference cues such as the color of a structure or the title of a restaurant.- Nikon COOLPIX Cameras are the first to launch Mapviewer on digital silent cameras and likewise present a digital location stamp that allows a city or POI title to live displayed with an image by leveraging the map content from HERE.- Recently launched new-generation navigation systems for Lexus and Toyota in the Middle East are powered by HERE maps. This will expand coverage by adding Jordan and Lebanon to the 6-country Arabian Gulf coverage. original platforms integrate a ambit of original HERE features such as 3D Landmarks and 3D city models to aid drivers obtain a better sense of orientation on the road.- TripAdvisor, the world`s largest travel site, selected the HERE Platform for geocoding services to present global coverage for consumers to diagram trips. HERE offers precise location information in more than 196 countries, helping TripAdvisor website visitors to access hotels, restaurants, and attractions across the world.

NSN OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS

- Mobile broadband deal momentum continued and during the quarter NSN was selected by Tele2 Netherlands to deliver 4G and related services nationwide; appointed by Celcom in Malaysia to supply 4G network infrastructure and services; expanded the 2G network and renewed services contracts in Southern Iraq for Korek Telecom; launched commercial LTE services in Paris for SFR; was appointed by Mobily in Saudi Arabia, to further modernize and expand its 2G, 3G and 4G networks; was chosen by MTS to provide a network upgrade and services in the Ukraine; and deployed FDD-LTE and a complete ambit of services for MTS in the Moscow and Central Russia regions.- NSN continues to lead in 4G technology, and by September, had helped every three major Korean operators - SK Telecom, LG U+ and Korea Telecom - to become the world`s first to launch LTE-Advanced commercially, using the capabilities of NSN`s Flexi Multiradio base Stations. During September, NSN likewise demonstrated the world`s first 4G TD-LTE network crucible showing that Authorized Shared Access (ASA) is paving the artery for future 5G networks. For the live trial, NSN deployed its network elements - commercial unique RAN Flexi MultiRadio 10 base Stations, commercial Core Network and commercial NetAct network management system - in three Finnish cities.- In August, industry analyst solid Gartner positioned NSN in the `Leaders` quadrant of the Magic Quadrant for LTE Network Infrastructure, for the second consecutive year. The ranking - based on an evaluation of the company`s product progress and innovation, fiscal performance, and customer references - places NSN among the three global network suppliers best positioned to back a mobile operator`s future in LTE, TD-LTE and LTE-Advanced.- NSN continues to invest in innovation to linger at the forefront of mobile broadband. In July, NSN and CDNetworks began working together to accelerate the delivery of benefits from Liquid Applications, driving a step change in the mobile broadband undergo and opening up original revenue streams for operators. In September, SK Telecom and NSN completed world`s first proof-of-concept of Liquid Applications over LTE, achieving a major milestone for enhancing the mobile broadband experience. The successful testing was conducted with three advanced services over LTE: location-based mobile advertising, augmented reality and premium application delivery.- NSN has completed comprehensive testing of mobile voice core services running in the Telco Cloud and in July confirmed that its cloud technology is on the brink of commercial deployment. The company successfully demonstrated an exhaustive set of utilize cases covering Voice over LTE (VoLTE) based on IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) and complete cloud orchestration, including cloud application management capabilities.- In July, NSN`s Customer undergo Management (CEM) contract with Beijing Mobile was extended to implement an extensive character of undergo solution, further improving its end-user customer experience, linking network performance with subscriber satisfaction and application behavior.

NOKIA IN JANUARY-SEPTEMBER 2013

The following discussion is of Nokia`s reported results for January-September 2013. Comparisons are given to January- September 2012 results, unless otherwise indicated.

The following table sets forth a summary of the reported results for the periods indicated, as well as the year-on-year growth rates.

NOKIA GROUP RESULTS SUMMARY   Q1-Q3/2013 Q1-Q3/2012 YoYChange Net sales (EUR million) 17 209 22 135 -22 % Gross margin (%) 32.2 26.2 Operating expenses (EUR million) -5 212 -6 842 -24 % Operating margin (%) -0.09 -12.3 Financial incomeand expense, net -227 -274 -17 % Tax -346 -1028 -66 % Loss -721 -4 031 -82 % Loss attributable toequity holders ofthe parent -590 -3 295 -82 % EPS, basic -0.16 -0.89 -82 % EPS, diluted -0.16 -0.89 -82 %

The decline in the Nokia Group net sales in the nine months of 2013 resulted from lower net sales in Devices & Services, as well as lower net sales in NSN and HERE. Within Devices & Services the net sales of Mobile Phones declined more than net sales in Smart Devices. Mobile Phones net sales decline was due to lower volumes and ASPs, affected by competitive industry dynamics, including fierce smartphone competition at increasingly lower charge points and fierce competition at the low quit of their product portfolio. The net sales decline in Smart Devices was due to lower volumes and ASPs, affected by competitive industry dynamics including the stout momentum of competing smartphone platforms as well as their portfolio transition from Symbian products to Lumia products. The decline in HERE net sales was primarily due to a decline in internal net sales primarily related to their Smart Devices traffic unit, partially offset by an extend in external net sales. The decline in NSN net sales was primarily due to lower net sales in Global Services as well as lower net sales in businesses not consistent with NSN strategic focus. In addition, net sales in Mobile Broadband likewise declined on an overall basis, while delivering stout growth in LTE.

The extend in Nokia Group monstrous margin in the first nine months of 2013 was due to higher monstrous margins in NSN and Devices & Services. NSN monstrous margin primarily increased due to higher monstrous margin in both Global Services and Mobile Broadband, as well as a higher balance of Mobile Broadband within the total sales mix. Devices & Services monstrous margin increased primarily due to higher monstrous margin in Smart Devices partially offset by lower monstrous margin in Mobile Phones.

The decrease in the Nokia Group operating expenses in the first nine months of 2013 was primarily due to Devices & Services and NSN. In both Devices & Services and NSN the decrease was primarily due to structural cost savings as well as overall cost controls.

The Nokia Group net fiscal income and expense in the first nine months of 2013 was a lower expense than in the first nine months of 2012. The lower net expense was primarily due to lower net odd exchange-related losses.

The Nokia Group taxes in the first nine months of 2013 were significantly lower than in the first nine months of 2012. The lower tax expense was primarily due to the absence of a non-cash valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets of EUR 800 million in the second quarter 2012.

The Nokia Group loss in the first nine months of 2013 was a smaller loss primarily due to lower operating expenses, lower other expenses, and lower tax expense primarily due to the absence of a non-cash valuation allowances related to deferred tax assets of EUR 800 million in the second quarter 2012.

RISK AND FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

It should live noted that Nokia and its traffic are exposed to various risks and uncertainties and inevitable statements herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those regarding: A) the planned sale by Nokia of substantially every of Nokia`s Devices & Services business, including Smart Devices and Mobile Phones (referred to below as "Sale of the D&S Business") pursuant to the Stock and Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of September 2, 2013, between Nokia and Microsoft International Holdings B.V.(referred to below as the "Agreement"); B) the closing of the Sale of the D&S Business; C) obtaining the confirmation and approval of their shareholders for the Sale of the D&S Business; D) receiving timely, or at all, necessary regulatory approvals for the Sale of the D&S Business; E) expectations, plans or benefits related to or caused by the Sale of the D&S Business; F) expectations, plans or benefits related to Nokia`s strategies, including plans for Nokia with respect to its continuing businesses that will not live divested in connection with the Sale of the D&S Business; G) expectations, plans or benefits related to changes in leadership and operational structure; H) expectations and targets regarding their operational priorities, fiscal performance or position, results of operations and utilize of proceeds from the Sale of the D&S Business; I) the timing of the deliveries of their products and services; J) their aptitude to innovate, develop, execute and commercialize original technologies, products and services; K) expectations regarding market developments and structural changes; L) expectations and targets regarding performance, including those related to market share, prices, net sales and margins of products and services; M) expectations and targets regarding collaboration and partnering arrangements; N) the outcome of pending and threatened litigation, regulatory proceedings or investigations by authorities; O) expectations regarding the successful completion of restructurings, investments, acquisitions and divestments on a timely basis and their aptitude to achieve the fiscal and operational targets set in connection with any such restructurings, investments, divestments and acquisitions, as well as any expected plans and benefits related to or caused by such transactions; and P) statements preceded by "believe," "expect," "anticipate," "foresee," "sees," "target," "estimate," "designed," "aim", "plans," "intends," "focus," "will" or similar expressions. These statements are based on management`s best assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently available to it. Because they involve risks and uncertainties, actual results may vary materially from the results that they currently expect. Factors, including risks and uncertainties that could understanding these differences include, but are not limited to: 1) the inability to nearby the Sale of the D&S traffic in a timely manner, or at all, for instance due to the inability or delays in obtaining the shareholder approval or necessary regulatory approvals for the Sale of the D&S Business, or the circumstance of any event, change or other circumstance that could give surge to the termination of the Agreement; 2) the potential adverse result on the sales of their mobile devices, traffic relationships, operating results and traffic generally resulting from the announcement of the Sale of the D&S traffic or from the terms that they suffer agreed for the Sale of the D&S Business; 3) any negative result from the implementation of the Sale of the D&S Business, as they may forego other competitive alternatives for strategies or partnerships that would benefit their Devices & Services traffic and if the Sale of the D&S traffic is not closed, they may suffer limited options to continue the Devices & Services traffic or enter into another transaction on terms favorable to us, or at all; 4) their aptitude to effectively and smoothly implement planned changes to their leadership and operational structure or maintain an efficient interim governance structure and preserve or hire key personnel; 5) any negative result from the implementation of the Sale of the D&S Business, including their internal reorganization in connection therewith, which will require significant time, attention and resources of their senior management and others within the company potentially diverting their attention from other aspects of their business; 6) disruption and dissatisfaction among employees caused by the plans and implementation of the Sale of the D&S Business, reducing focus and productivity in areas of their business; 7) the amount of the costs, fees, expenses and charges related to or triggered by the Sale of the D&S Business; 8) any impairments or charges to carrying values of assets or liabilities related to or triggered by the Sale of the D&S Business; 9) potential adverse effects on their business, properties or operations caused by us implementing the Sale of the D&S Business; 10) the initiation or outcome of any legal proceedings, regulatory proceedings or enforcement matters that may live instituted against us relating to the Sale of the D&S Business; 11) the success of their HERE strategy, including their aptitude to establish a successful location-based platform and extend their location-based services across devices and operating systems; 12) their aptitude to protect numerous patented standardized or proprietary technologies from third-party infringement or actions to invalidate the intellectual property rights of these technologies; 13) their aptitude to maintain the existing sources of intellectual property related revenue and establish original such sources; 14) the intensity of competition in the various markets where they result traffic and their aptitude to maintain or ameliorate their market position or respond successfully to changes in the competitive environment; 15) their aptitude to maintain momentum and extend their speed of innovation, product progress and execution in order to bring original innovative and competitive products and location-based or other services to the market in a timely manner; 16) their aptitude to effectively and smoothly implement the planned changes in their operational structure and achieve targeted efficiencies and reductions in operating expenses and their aptitude to complete the planned divestments and acquisition, including obtaining any needed regulatory approvals; 17) their aptitude to retain, motivate, develop and recruit appropriately skilled employees; 18) their dependence on the progress of the mobile and communications industry, including location-based and other services industries, in numerous diverse markets, as well as on generic economic conditions globally and regionally; 19) their aptitude to maintain and leverage their position and strengths, especially if they are unable retain the loyalty of their mobile operator and distributor customers and consumers as a result of the implementation of their strategies or other factors; 20) the performance of the parties they colleague and collaborate with and their aptitude to achieve successful collaboration or partnering arrangements; 21) their aptitude to deliver their products profitably, in line with character requirements and on time, especially if the limited number of suppliers they depend on, many of which are geographically concentrated with a majority based in Asia, fail to deliver sufficient quantities of fully functional products, components, sub-assemblies, software and services on favorable terms and in compliance with their supplier requirements; 22) their aptitude to manage efficiently their manufacturing and logistics, as well as to ensure the quality, safety, security and timely delivery of their products and services; 23) any actual or even alleged defects or other quality, safety and security issues in their products; 24) any inefficiency, malfunction or disruption of a system or network that their operations confidence on; 25) the impact of cybersecurity trespass or other factors leading to an actual or alleged loss, unbecoming disclosure or leakage of any personal or consumer data collected by us or their partners or subcontractors, made available to us or stored in or through their products; 26) their aptitude to successfully manage the pricing of their products and services and costs related to their products and services and their operations; 27) the potential knotty tax issues and obligations they may face, including the responsibility to pay additional taxes in various jurisdictions and their actual or anticipated performance, among other factors, could result in allowances related to deferred tax assets; 28) exchange rate fluctuations, particularly between the euro, which is their reporting currency, and the US dollar, the Japanese yen and the Chinese yuan, as well as inevitable other currencies; 29) their aptitude to protect the technologies, which they or others develop or which they license, from claims that they suffer infringed third parties` intellectual property rights, as well as their unrestricted utilize on commercially acceptable terms of inevitable technologies in their product and services; 30) the impact of economic, regulatory, political or other progress on their sales, manufacturing facilities and assets located in emerging market countries as well as the impact of regulations against imports to those countries; 31) the impact of changes in and enforcement of government policies, technical standards, trade policies, laws or regulations in countries where their assets are located and where they result business; 32) investigations or claims by contracting parties in relation to exits from countries, areas or contractual arrangements; 33) unfavorable outcome of litigation, regulatory proceedings or investigations by authorities; 34) allegations of practicable health risks from electromagnetic fields generated by base stations and mobile devices, and the lawsuits and publicity related to them, regardless of merit; 35) Nokia Solutions and Networks` (renamed from Nokia Siemens Networks) likewise referred to as NSN success in the mobile broadband infrastructure and related services market and its aptitude to effectively, profitably and timely conform traffic and operations to the diverse needs of its customers; 36) NSN`s aptitude to maintain and ameliorate its market position and respond successfully to changes and competition in the mobile broadband infrastructure and related services market; 37) NSN`s success in implementing its restructuring diagram and reducing its operating expenses and other costs; 38) NSN`s aptitude to invest in and timely insert original competitive products, services, upgrades and technologies; 39) NSN`s dependence on limited number of customers and large, multi-year contracts; 40) NSN`s liquidity and its aptitude to meet its working capital requirements, including access to available credit under its financing arrangements and other credit lines as well as cash at hand; 41) the management of NSN`s customer financing exposure; 42) whether ongoing or any additional governmental investigations of alleged violations of law by some former employees of Siemens may involve and move the carrier-related assets and employees transferred by Siemens to Nokia Siemens Networks (renamed Nokia Solutions and Networks); 43) any impairment of NSN`s customer relationships resulting from ongoing or any additional governmental investigations involving the Siemens carrier-related operations transferred to Nokia Siemens Networks (renamed Nokia Solutions and Networks), as well as the risk factors specified on pages 12-47 of Nokia`s annual report on figure 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 under particular 3D. "Risk Factors". Other unknown or unpredictable factors or underlying assumptions subsequently proving to live incorrect could understanding actual results to vary materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Nokia does not undertake any responsibility to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of original information, future events or otherwise, except to the extent legally required.

Nokia, Helsinki - October 29, 2013

Media and Investor Contacts:

Nokia

Corporate Communicationstel. +358 7180 34900email: press.services@nokia.com

Investor Relations Europetel. +358 7180 34927

Investor Relations UStel. +1 914 368 0555

www.nokia.com

- Nokia plans to publish its fourth quarter 2013 and annual 2013 report on January 23, 2014- Nokia will hold an Extraordinary generic Meeting on November 19, 2013. The notice of the meeting and more information can live organize at www.nokia.com/gm.

This announcement is distributed by Thomson Reuters on behalf of Thomson Reuters clients.

The owner of this announcement warrants that:(i) the releases contained herein are protected by copyright and other applicable laws; and(ii) they are solely responsible for the content, accuracy and originality of theinformation contained therein.

Source: NOKIA via Thomson Reuters ONEHUG#1738836


Data dedupe software comes of age | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

Data deduplication has turned into one of the most notable topics related to data backup and recovery because it offers simplification and cost savings at a relatively modest cost. Dedupe appliances were the powerful dog for a long time, but dedupe software has arrive on stout more recently, offering many useful capabilities, often at a lower cost than an appliance.

Perhaps most crucially, just about every backup software products suffer now integrated deduplication as a feature at this point (Hewlett-Packard Data Protector is a rare exception), making deduplication easily accessible.

The advantages of data dedupe software vs. an appliance

Lauren Whitehouse, analyst at Enterprise Strategy Group, offers a long list of pluses associated with data dedupe software:

  • Deduplication policies are integrated in overall backup policies so there is no necessity to set deduplication policies in a divorce interface; the software offers a unique point of management.
  • Deduplication in backup software allows deduplication to happen closer to the source of data (at the production system or at the backup media server). Deduplication processing can live then distributed in the environment instead of at a consolidation point (such as an appliance).
  • Global deduplication is more likely available in data dedupe software.
  • Backup software understands the actual data so it's content-aware. Appliances are just on the receiving quit of the backup data stream and are not -- unless the appliance vendor transpose engineers the format, she said. “Content-awareness allows deduplication software to understand where the natural pattern breaks are in the data stream so they can drive higher deduplication ratios,” she added.
  • Any actions on deduplicated data are tracked by the backup catalog. This means that recovery is streamlined. Copies made via replication features of appliances can't live tracked ... unless the user is using Symantec NetBackup or Symantec Backup Exec with OpenStorage technology (and the appliance supports OST). 
  • Scalability of deduplication should usually live easier (unless the appliance scales seamlessly, fancy those from Exagrid Systems, NEC and Sepaton Inc. that suffer grid architecture approaches).
  • Licensing varies, but deduplication in software can live more cost effective, especially if it's a no-charge feature.
  • Disk vendor selection flexibility is greater since software uses existing disk and the user can pick any vendor's storage system.
  • The advantages of a dedupe appliance

    On the other hand, Whitehouse said there are some specific advantages to dedupe appliances. For instance, with an appliance, data deduplication is performed on systems optimized specifically for data deduplication processing. For some kinds of workloads, deduplication performance can live improved this way. Likewise, integration is “often a bit easier,” since the appliance just requires you to set policy configurations, whereas software-based deduplication requires configuration of the media server to provide the processing power needed. 

    Of course, appliances likewise eradicate loads on production servers and can deduplicate data for any backup system environment. “If a site has more than one backup solution and a unique deduplication strategy is desired, this would live the artery to go,” she said.

    David Russell, an analyst at Gartner, has arrive to similar conclusions but he definitely sees a trend among clients toward dedupe software. For instance, in surveys conducted at recent Gartner conferences, of those planning to implement dedupe, 42 percent said they would utilize a software approach -- the highest balance ever recorded by Gartner, and a sharp surge from “the low twenties” a year earlier, he said.

    “The thinking is that with software, they can Go and buy a towering power server and install the code for a cost that is below that for an appliance,” said Russell. Furthermore, noted Russell, “with an appliance you can’t expand in the future without having to worry about what specific appliance model you will necessity or whether the vendors present a gateway to the targeted device.”

    While Russell endorses the trend he does survey some problems with software-based deduplication. For instance, much depends on how it is deployed. “I suffer seen organizations that aren’t sure how to size this and build the infrastructure -- if you undersize your disk resources in terms of both the amount of space and the nature of disk, that can likewise debase the performance of software-based deduplication,” said Russell. “People will vice the software when they are really doing unreasonable things fancy trying to Run dedupe on a server that’s already very diligent running Exchange,” he said.

    “In other words, the software has advantages but it likewise gives people the opportunity to shoot themselves in the foot,” he said.

    One solution, he said, is to implement appliances for demanding dedupe challenges such as a large database, while using software for lighter and more manageable dedupe work. “Big objects fancy databases could bog down a server running dedupe, whereas an appliance is optimized for that kindhearted of work,” he said.

    Consulting company goes with CommVault Simpana

    Paul Slager is the director of information systems at LWG Consulting in Northbrook, IL, which has 16 locations in the U.S. and four globally, recently opted for the software approach. The company, which focuses on technical disaster consulting for post-disaster issues such as data recovery, mostly on behalf of insurers, runs many virtual machines and backs up over relatively late WAN links. As a result, “client-side dedupe and global dedupe and compression were issues they considered,” said Slager.

    With a storage appliance, you usually bag a cost-per-gigabyte or terabyte that is pretty towering even for basic SATA and, for Fibre Channel drives, the vendors minister to jack the charge up quite a bit more.

    Paul Slager, director of information systems, LWG Consulting 

    Slager said he was looking for a backup solution that had suited deduplication capability. “Our company takes millions of very high-resolution files that they suffer to store on their file servers for 12 years -- they wanted to dedupe and compress as much as possible,” he said.  He looked at IBM Corp. Tivoli Storage Manager, CommVault, EMC Corp Avamar and Data Domain, initially, and decided the dedupe software option was the cheapest. The software option likewise allowed him to utilize his own storage. “With a storage appliance, you usually bag a cost-per-gigabyte or terabyte that is pretty towering even for basic SATA and, for Fibre Channel drives, the vendors minister to jack the charge up quite a bit more,” he said.

    Ultimately, he selected CommVault Simpana 9.0, which “seemed to suffer it all.” Slager said in addition to dedupe capabilities, it was likewise the “simple things” fancy the fact that Simpana allowed the aptitude to suspend or resume backup. That was helpful because of the company’s late WAN. “Now, if one server goes down I don’t suffer to restart the total backup,” he explained. 

    Slager said he thinks his undergo with CommVault was likewise helped by preparation. “At the start, I laid out a framework and collected a list of requirements including how it would move their storage footprint, how it would suitable with disaster recovery plans and their recovery point and recovery time objectives,” he said.

    Slager said he went into the process realizing that getting towering dedupe ratios would live difficult with any product. However, he was hopeful his virtual machines, databases and Exchange data would dedupe well. “I actually ran the EMC assessment implement for Avamar to survey what their dedupe ratios would live and to figure out how much backup storage they needed to procure,” he said. That implement yielded an appraise of 5 TB of space for the initial seed. Results with CommVault, exceeded that expectation. In fact, he said, with the CommVault deployment the initial seed turned out to live only 3.2 TB. And dedupe ratios suffer been as suited or better than he expected.

    So far, Slager said he has logged the following ratios in service:

  • Virtual machines running on VMware suffer a dedupe ratio of 84%, “which is really good,” he said.
  • Microsoft Exchange 2010 backups suffer a dedupe ratio of 68%
  • Physical Windows servers suffer a dedupe ratio of 77%
  • My File shares with every of the image files suffer a dedupe ratio of 11%
  • Microsoft SQL database backups suffer a dedupe of 64%
  • Microsoft SharePoint database and documents suffer a dedupe of 57%
  • Those numbers look to live in accord with what analysts see. For example, Whitehouse said although vendor claims are “all over the map” from 500:1 to a “more normal” 20:1, Enterprise Strategy Group research organize that most end-users using deduplication cite a ratio of between 10:1 and 20:1, while a smaller percentage suffer seen higher ratios of 30:1.

    Russell said the fact that software takes confidence of deduplication at the source will likely live substantive more growth for that approach. “If you told a network administrator you could reduce traffic by 95 percent through dedupe they would live very impressed,” he said.

    However, Russell likewise said the respective advantages of both dedupe appliance and software approaches will continue and may eventually defer a hybrid approach to deduplication. For instance, he noted, EMC has hinted about combining Avamar, which does dedupe, with a Data Domain target appliance. Thus, he said, it would live wise for determination makers to hedge their bets so they will live able to pick handicap of hybrid if it emerges in a few years.

    About this author: Alan Earls is a frequent contributor to SearchDataBackup.


    MobileIron, Inc. (MOBL) | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

    No result found, try original keyword!Thank you for your continued support. I’m pleased to report that 2016 was MobileIron's strongest year to date. I want to provide some color about their achievements and share with you my strategic focus ...


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11712745
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1hW
    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/st0-172
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12283635
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/just-study-these-symantec-st0-172.html
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/Pass4sureSt0-172RealQuestionBank
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/4k0abjwre9aosxnb25lelvbybohigx8r
    publitas.com : https://view.publitas.com/trutrainers-inc/real-st0-172-questions-that-appeared-in-test-today
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/5xjzy78c5d13ca64f459082f5fb5b4a97e48f











    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |



     

    Gli Eventi