LOT-986 Braindumps

Download Updated Pass4sure LOT-986 practice questions | VCE | cheat sheets | stargeo.it

Killexams.com LOT-986 Q & A - practice questions - VCE - examcollection - braindumps and exam prep are the best to prepare LOT-986 certification to get full marks - cheat sheets - stargeo.it

Pass4sure LOT-986 dumps | Killexams.com LOT-986 actual questions | http://www.stargeo.it/new/


Killexams.com LOT-986 Dumps and actual Questions

100% actual Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with lofty Marks - Just Memorize the Answers



LOT-986 exam Dumps Source : Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques

Test Code : LOT-986
Test denomination : Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques
Vendor denomination : IBM
: 164 actual Questions

i've discovered a very auspicious source modern day LOT-986 cloth.
I was 2 weeks short of my LOT-986 exam and my schooling was now not every finished as my LOT-986 books were given burnt in hearth incident at my location. every I strategy at that point became to give up the selection of giving the paper as I didnt maintain any aid to do together from. Then I opted for killexams.com and that i although am in a nation of marvel that I cleared my LOT-986 exam. With the free demo of killexams.com, i was capable of preserve nearby things without troubles.


That turned into terrific! I got dumps modern-day LOT-986 exam.
Its concise answers helped me to carry out perquisite marks noting every questions beneath the stipulated time in LOT-986. Being an IT master, my competencies with recognize are so forth want to live pinnacle. No longer withstanding, proceeding with a customaryemployment with huge duties, it maintain become no longer clean for me to Take a solid planning. At that factor, i establish out about the usually organized question and reply aide of killexams.com dumps.


Afraid of failing LOT-986 exam!
With using exceptional products of killexams.com, I had scored 92 percent marks in LOT-986 certification. i used to live looking for dependable test material to boom my information stage. Technical concepts and tough language of my certification changed into arduous to understand consequently i used to live on the lookout for dependable and effortless examine products. I had Come to understand this website for the guidance of expert certification. It was not an effortless job but simplest killexams.com has made this process smooth for me. i am emotion appropriate for my fulfillment and this platform is exceptional for me.


it's miles remarkable to maintain LOT-986 actual exam questions.
due to LOT-986 certificate you got many chances for security experts improvement for your career. I desired to developmentmy vocation in records safety and desired to grow to live certified as a LOT-986. in that case I determined to Take palliate from killexams.com and began my LOT-986 exam education thru LOT-986 exam cram. LOT-986 exam cram made LOT-986 certificatestudies effortless to me and helped me to harvest my desires effortlessly. Now im able to train without hesitation, without this website I by no means passed my LOT-986 exam in first strive.


I feel very confident by preparing LOT-986 actual test questions.
I cracked my LOT-986 exam on my first try with seventy two.Five% in just 2 days of education. Thank you killexams.com on your valuable questions. I did the exam with not anyone worry. Looking ahead to smooth the LOT-986 exam along side your assist.


I feel very confident with LOT-986 question bank.
Attempted masses to pellucid my LOT-986 exam taking assist from the books. However the arduous motives and toughinstance made things worse and that i skipped the check two instances. Ultimately, my fine pal recommended me the question& reply via route of killexams.com. And account me, it labored so nicely! The exceptional contents were awesome to undergo and apprehend the subjects. I must with out issues cram it too and answered the questions in barely a hundred and 80 minutes time. Felt elated to skip well. Thank you, killexams.com dumps. route to my lovely friend too.


just depend upon this LOT-986 actual question source.
I actually maintain lately handed the LOT-986 exam with this bundle. This is a incredible reply if you requisite a brief yet answerable training for LOT-986 exam. This is a expert degree, so matter on that you nonetheless want to disburse time playing with - practical live pleased is key. Yet, as a ways and exam simulations move, killexams.com is the winner. Their exam simulator surely simulates the exam, such as the particular query sorts. It does earn things less complicated, and in my case, I account it contributed to me getting a 100% marks! I could not confidence my eyes! I knew I did nicely, however this changed into a surprise!!


got most LOT-986 Quiz in actual check that I prepared.
Due to consecutive failures in my LOT-986 exam, I was every devastated and thought of changing my province as I felt that this is not my cup of tea. But then someone told me to give one eventual try of the LOT-986 exam with killexams.com and that I wont live disappointed for sure. I thought about it and gave one eventual try. The eventual try with killexams.com for the LOT-986 exam went successful as this site didnt do every the efforts to earn things toil for me. It didnt let me change my province as I cleared the paper.


Get these and chillout!
I had taken the LOT-986 arrangement from the killexams.com as that was an average stage for the preparation which had eventually given the best flat of the planning to prick the 92% scores inside the LOT-986 check exams. I really delighted in the system I got issues the things emptied the racy technique and thru the advocate of the same; I had at long eventual got the thing out and about. It had made my arrangement a ton of simpler and with the advocate of the killexams.com I had been prepared to develop well inside the life.


So clean questions in LOT-986 exam! i used to live already adequate organized.
Analyzing for the LOT-986 exam has been a difficult going. With so many puzzling topics to cowl, killexams.com prompted the self notion for passing the exam via taking me through hub questions on the status of affairs. It paid off as I should skip the exam with a outstanding pass percent of 80 4%. A number of the questions came twisted, but the answers that matched from killexams.com helped me price the perquisite solutions.


IBM Creating IBM Lotus Notes

as soon as king of business software, Lotus Notes is dragging IBM down | killexams.com actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Lotus Notes is coming! Or, perhaps it's declining

When IBM bought Lotus for $three.5 billion in 1995, it regarded as although the venerable computing gigantic was basically to lock up the software trade and coast to unstoppable gains.

Eighteen years later, Lotus looks more like a millstone around IBM’s neck than a flywheel giving it additional speed.

according to a file in the Wall road Journal, in boost of IBM’s this autumn profits unlock nowadays, Lotus was the weakest performer in IBM’s software portfolio, shedding 6.4 % of its revenue volume in the first nine months of 2012.

It probably bills for roughly $1 billion in annual revenue, in accordance with estimates sourced via the WSJ, or one-sixth to 1-fifth of IBM’s overall utility enterprise.

paradoxically, Lotus once led the route towards nowadays’s hottest commercial enterprise applied sciences, the collaborative utility that helps teams talk and toil together on tasks. one of the vital success reviews of that niche is Yammer, which Microsoft obtained closing 12 months for $1.2 billion. So, why is IBM sitting at the back of the pack as a substitute of leading from the entrance?

Lotus, which made the primary blockbuster “killer app” in the 1980s (Lotus 1-2-three, a phenomenally a hit spreadsheet program), went on to create Lotus Notes, a powerful groupware suite that got here out in the early Nineteen Nineties earlier than anybody had any theory what “groupware” become.

I used it significantly at a few corporations I worked with. in the beginning, it became arcane and strong. like most conclusion-users of Lotus Notes, I used it essentially as an email program. It had its quirks, nonetheless it worked. however there turned into a further dimension to Notes, a magnificent, programmable backend that permit you to create databases and workspaces for collaborative work, contact management, tips sharing, and communique.

these days, we’d convene it a collaboration device or a company social-media tool, and it will live web-primarily based and requisites-compliant, like Yammer, Jive, and Huddle. within the absence of requisites, Notes’ engineers needed to invent every shrimp thing themselves, making it a perspicacious but proprietary solution.

however lengthy earlier than those web-based startups got here along, Notes was already losing its cool. The client software grew to become huge and bloated. It became lofty priced to do into outcome and difficult to customise.

as the web gained popularity in the late Nineties, Lotus brought requirements, like POP3 and IMAP electronic mail interfaces. They didn’t accomplish that neatly with the requisites department, besides the fact that children, riding anybody who had to disburse a web mail client with a Lotus Notes mail server absolutely insane.

The upshot is that, simply as the cyber web grew to live universal, Lotus Notes became disturbing and obsolete.

sure, it became nonetheless powerful, however unlocking the verve of Notes often required professional skills, giving rise to a sector of Notes consultants. No dumbfound that these consultants are having a tough time getting taken severely these days. The WSJ costs a Notes advisor who complains about his reception:

“i am going to a party, and that i shortly procure insulted,” says Eugen Tarnow, a director of the consultancy Avalon company techniques, which sells the growing primitive email application to agencies. “they are saying, ‘Lotus Notes, that’s nevertheless around?’ It’s no enjoyable.”

lamentably, IBM’s engineers realized the value of requisites compliance too late and didn’t bake interoperability into Lotus Notes smartly adequate or early ample. So, as efficient as Notes may well be, it became and is sick-prepared to toil in these days’s API-wealthy cloud atmosphere.

IBM has extra modern social-media application, too, but most efficient makes about $55 million per yr from that section of its enterprise. So the challenge for IBM is to proceed milking as lots income as it can from Lotus, while regularly shifting the branding and the income to newer, sexier lines of business. One example: Renaming its annual Lotus convention, Lotusphere, as “Connect2013.” Yeah, that’ll support.

We’ll live looking at to descry if the profits document sheds any more mild on IBM’s efforts to note Notes around. however as for me, I’m now not protecting my breath.

picture credit score: Andrew Mason by route of photopin cc


IBM to invest $2B into AI hardware efforts in manhattan: three notes | killexams.com actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

Jessica Kim Cohen - Friday, February 8th, 2019 Print  | electronic mail

IBM plans to earn investments greater than $2 billion to develop its ersatz intelligence footprint in tremendous apple state, manhattan Governor Andrew Cuomo announced Feb. 7.

"ny has at every times been at the forefront of emerging industries, and this deepest sector investment to create a hub for ersatz intelligence research will attract world-classification minds and power economic boom in the vicinity," Mr. Cuomo stated in a information release.

Three notes:

1. IBM will invest in AI efforts at SUNY Polytechnic Institute's campus in Albany, N.Y., and other IBM facilities in the state. IBM plans to deliver at least $30 million for AI research across the SUNY system, with SUNY matching as much as $25 million.

2. A key Part of the $2 billion commitment is an AI hardware middle that IBM will open at the SUNY Polytechnic Institute's campus. The core will focal point on research, edifice and testing related to laptop chips utilized in AI.

3. IBM pointed out the company expects the AI hardware middle to appeal to unusual AI companies and federal researchers to the state, as well as foster economic development and create unusual jobs. The hub will collaborate with a number of expertise businesses, together with Samsung and Tokyo Electron restricted.

"under the governor's leadership, their partnership with groups continues to foster analysis breakthroughs and monetary boom whereas working to combat every shrimp thing from ailments and melanoma to mitigating climate change," SUNY Chancellor Kristina Johnson, PhD, observed. "artificial intelligence is just one illustration of how SUNY is investing in unusual tech clusters to prepare their college students for the first rate-paying jobs of the next day."

extra articles on ersatz intelligence:Northwell fitness adds AI for readmissions to its EMRNew algorithm from MIT might possibly live able to 'de-bias' AI: 3 notesDr. Eric Topol: 10 competencies AI purposes for clinicians, hospitals

© Copyright ASC COMMUNICATIONS 2019. drawn to LINKING to or REPRINTING this content? View their policies by route of clicking here.

To obtain the latest medical institution and health equipment company and criminal advice and evaluation from Becker's clinic evaluation, sign-up for the free Becker's health hub assessment E-weekly by route of clicking perquisite here.

IBM Modernizes Domino company App Platform | killexams.com actual Questions and Pass4sure dumps

news

IBM Modernizes Domino enterprise App Platform
  • through David Ramel
  • 10/16/2018
  • IBM has modernized Domino, its enterprise app platform with roots within the Lotus Notes ecosystem that debuted in 1989.

    once essentially prevalent because the server-side section of Lotus Notes, Domino is a multi-faceted platform that offers app edifice -- using the quick-software-construction mode -- and extra.

    In revamping the 29-yr-historical platform, IBM has enhanced cloud support, cellular application development, analytics and boosted the collaboration capabilities that had been a mainstay of Lotus Notes, which became IBM Notes in a 1995 acquisition.

    Two of essentially the most high-quality modernizations within the unusual IBM Domino v10 are cell app construction capabilities and the embody of node.js.

    The enhanced cellular development performance is available in the unusual IBM Domino cell Apps, which is being previewed as a beta for which developers can symptom in. Furthering the IBM/Apple company relationship, the offering lets developers create Apple iPad enterprise apps. "IBM Domino additionally replicates facts between the server and local edition of your applications, so your team can moreover live productive even devoid of community connectivity," the business noted.

    developers can moreover signal on to try out the brand unusual node.js usher that comes in the IBM Domino AppDev Pack. "Domino builders can request early access to the realm of JavaScript and Node.js through the IBM Domino AppDev Pack," IBM mentioned. "As an add-on to IBM Domino V10, each JavaScript and Domino developers can live in a position to increase, combine, and easily build unusual purposes using IBM Domino information."

    one other unusual feature is the capability for developers to denomination any leisure APIs from Domino purposes, allowing the ability, for examples, to add Google Maps functionality, drag in Salesforce consumer statistics or leverage IBM's Watson capabilities.

    the unusual Domino v10 stems from a construction settlement IBM entered into with HCL applied sciences a yr ago.

    in regards to the author

    David Ramel is the editor of visual Studio magazine.


    Whilst it is very arduous chore to choose answerable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people procure ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com earn it certain to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients Come to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and trait because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self self-possession is essential to every of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you descry any bogus report posted by their competitor with the denomination killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something like this, just advocate in intellect that there are always noxious people damaging reputation of auspicious services due to their benefits. There are a big number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams practice questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

    Back to Braindumps Menu


    P6040-017 braindumps | 132-S-816.1 test prep | 000-544 exam prep | 7391X brain dumps | 200-125 practice test | EE0-071 free pdf download | HP3-X11 VCE | 000-036 examcollection | A4070-603 pdf download | HP0-Y12 test prep | 000-416 study guide | 310-302 free pdf | HP0-S39 questions and answers | 000-736 mock exam | 000-200 practice questions | 920-551 actual questions | EW0-200 study guide | 9L0-608 cheat sheets | HP3-C11 practice test | 000-797 free pdf |


    Just study these LOT-986 Questions and study guide
    We are doing incredible battle to give you actual Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques exam questions and answers, along clarifications. Each on killexams.com has been appeared by methods for IBM ensured specialists. They are colossally qualified and affirmed people, who maintain quite a long while of expert experience perceived with the IBM evaluations. They check the question as per actual test.

    If you are examining out IBM LOT-986 Dumps containing actual exam Questions and Answers for the Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques test prep? killexams.com is revise here to provide you one most updated and glorious database of LOT-986 Dumps that's http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/LOT-986. they maintain got aggregative information of LOT-986 Dumps questions from actual tests to provide you an opening to prepare and pass LOT-986 exam at the first attempt. killexams.com Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as below; WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on web site PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders additional than $69 DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders over $99 SEPSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders

    It is basic to amass to the usher material if one needs toward redeem time. As you require clusters of time to contemplate for updated and genuine examination material for taking the IT certification exam. If you find that at one place, what could live better than this? Its objective killexams.com that has what you require. You can redeem time and advocate away from anguish if you buy Adobe IT accreditation from their site.

    You should procure the most updated IBM LOT-986 Braindumps with the revise answers, set up by killexams.com specialists, empowering the likelihood to understand finding out about their LOT-986 exam course in the best, you won't find LOT-986 consequences of such trait wherever in the market. Their IBM LOT-986 practice Dumps are given to candidates at performing 100% in their exam. Their IBM LOT-986 exam dumps are latest in the market, enabling you to prepare for your LOT-986 exam in the perquisite way.

    If you are possessed with successfully Passing the IBM LOT-986 exam to start securing? killexams.com has driving edge made IBM exam tends to that will pledge you pass this LOT-986 exam! killexams.com passes on you the correct, present and latest updated LOT-986 exam questions and available with 100% unlimited assurance. numerous associations that give LOT-986 intellect dumps yet those are not genuine and latest ones. Course of action with killexams.com LOT-986 unusual inquiries is a most impeccable route to deal with pass this accreditation exam in straightforward way.

    We are generally particularly mindful that a vital issue in the IT business is that nonattendance of significant worth examination materials. Their exam prep material gives you that you should Take a certification exam. Their IBM LOT-986 Exam will give you exam inquiries with certified answers that mirror the genuine exam. These inquiries and answers give you the experience of stepping through the veritable exam. lofty bore and motivator for the LOT-986 Exam. 100% certification to pass your IBM LOT-986 exam and procure your IBM certification. They at killexams.com are set out to empower you to pass your LOT-986 exam with lofty scores. The chances of you fail to walkover through your LOT-986 test, after encountering their broad exam dumps are for every intents and purposes nothing.

    killexams.com Great LOT-986 exam test system is amazingly reassuring for their customers for the exam prep. Monstrously fundamental inquiries, focuses and definitions are included in brain dumps pdf. convivial event the data in a sole district is a honest to goodness palliate and Ass you prepare for the IT certification exam inside a short time term navigate. The LOT-986 exam offers key core interests. The killexams.com pass4sure dumps holds the basic inquiries or thoughts of the LOT-986 exam

    At killexams.com, they give totally overviewed IBM LOT-986 planning resources the best to pass LOT-986 exam, and to procure ensured by IBM. It is a best selection to accelerate your situation as a specialist in the Information Technology industry. They are satisfied with their reputation of helping people walkover through the LOT-986 test in their first endeavor. Their flourishing rates in the past two years maintain been totally awesome, due to their cheery customers as of now prepared to instigate their situations in the most optimized strategy of attack. killexams.com is the principle selection among IT specialists, especially the ones planning to climb the movement levels speedier in their individual organizations. IBM is the business pioneer in information development, and getting certified by them is a guaranteed route to deal with win with IT positions. They empower you to accomplish really that with their radiant IBM LOT-986 getting ready materials.

    killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as under;
    WC2017: 60% Discount Coupon for every exams on website
    PROF17: 10% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $69
    DEAL17: 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
    DECSPECIAL: 10% Special Discount Coupon for every Orders


    IBM LOT-986 is uncommon every around the world, and the business and programming courses of action gave by them are gotten a ply on by each one of the associations. They maintain helped in driving an expansive number of associations on the shot mode for accomplishment. Extensive learning of IBM things are seen as a basic capacity, and the specialists ensured by them are astoundingly regraded in every organizations.

    LOT-986 Practice Test | LOT-986 examcollection | LOT-986 VCE | LOT-986 study guide | LOT-986 practice exam | LOT-986 cram


    Killexams HP0-094 free pdf | Killexams HP0-823 questions and answers | Killexams DSST-HRM practice test | Killexams M8010-246 examcollection | Killexams 050-644 actual questions | Killexams 3305 dump | Killexams AVA exam prep | Killexams 700-703 bootcamp | Killexams 000-917 exam questions | Killexams 1Z0-102 dumps | Killexams 000-606 practice test | Killexams M2010-727 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-N12 actual questions | Killexams 1Z0-495 test prep | Killexams 0G0-081 VCE | Killexams 1Z0-851 brain dumps | Killexams HPE2-K43 study guide | Killexams 000-026 cram | Killexams HP0-Y20 questions answers | Killexams HP0-921 free pdf |


    killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

    View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps


    Killexams 000-636 sample test | Killexams GE0-806 study guide | Killexams HP0-409 dump | Killexams 000-512 bootcamp | Killexams A2180-607 practice questions | Killexams 000-580 test prep | Killexams IQ0-100 actual questions | Killexams HP2-T15 examcollection | Killexams 70-511-CSharp study guide | Killexams 000-705 cheat sheets | Killexams 190-756 exam prep | Killexams NSCA-CPT test prep | Killexams A2010-564 braindumps | Killexams 1Z0-055 study guide | Killexams 000-183 practice test | Killexams FSDEV free pdf | Killexams HP0-D08 test questions | Killexams 000-866 dumps questions | Killexams 050-ENVCSE01 test prep | Killexams C2070-448 exam prep |


    Creating IBM Lotus Notes and Domino 8.5(R) Applications with Xpages and Advanced Techniques

    Pass 4 certain LOT-986 dumps | Killexams.com LOT-986 actual questions | http://www.stargeo.it/new/

    Is Everybody Working for the Weekend? | killexams.com actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    This is not a typical DKos post (at least, not for me), but this thread over at Kevin Drum's district got me thinking about a very simple question: accomplish you like your job?

    The title of this post, of course, refers to the 80s anthem by Loverboy of (more or less) the same name. But how precise is that saying? I'm really curious to know how people feel about their current employment. If you like your job, why? If not, why not? And are you planning to accomplish anything about it? accomplish you umpire you'll ever find a job you truly love? And for those of you who already accomplish care for their jobs, how did you wind up with your job, and why exactly accomplish you care for it? Hmm... perhaps it's not such a simple question after all!

    I would really care for to hear people's thoughts on this topic - and not just in response to my specific questions. Anything related is cool. So please, Take the poll & jump perquisite in.

    P.S. And if you don't intellect telling us, what sort of job accomplish you have, or what line of toil are you in? Don't denomination any employers, of course - just a job description.

    Update [2005-7-8 23:0:56 by DavidNYC]: This has been a truly fascinating thread - I animate you to read every the route through it. There are comments from an extraordinary array of people: A bodybuilder, a tattoo artist, and a horse breeder to denomination a few of the more unusual jobs.

    But just as importantly, this thread has reminded me of what I care for most about Daily Kos: The diversity of backgrounds combined with a universal desire to learn and listen. I umpire the site is at its best when these traits are showcased, as they are in this thread tonight.


    Residents’ and Attending Physicians’ Handoffs: A Systematic Review of the Literature | killexams.com actual questions and Pass4sure dumps

    Effective communication is central to patient safety and quality. Inadequate communication consistently appears as a factor contributing to medical errors, across settings and practitioners. These span from an incident with a sole patient1 to broader communication issues between physicians and nurses.2 In reviews of malpractice claims, communication problems were contributing factors in 26% to 31% of cases.3–5 The Joint Commission has reviewed data from 6,244 sentinel events occurring between 1995 and June 30, 2009.6 Communication problems maintain long been renowned as a major contributing factor to these sentinel events. Sutcliffe et al7 conducted semistructured interviews with residents, who recalled 70 recent medical mishaps, and indicated that 91% contained communication failures.

    Handoffs, the transfer of patient care from one health care provider to another, are known to live vulnerable to communication failures8 and maintain been called “remarkably haphazard.”9 As defined by the Joint Commission, handoff communication refers to a standardized process “in which information about patient/client/resident care is communicated in a consistent manner.”10

    Retrospective reviews of malpractice claims in the ambulatory setting11 and emergency department12 showed that handoffs were a contributing factor in 20% and 24% of medical errors, respectively. When looking specifically at malpractice cases with communication breakdowns, 43% involved handoffs.13 A review of 146 surgical errors establish that 41 (28%) involved handoffs.14 Of residents and fellows who reported caring for a patient with an adverse event, 15% indicated the reason for the mistake was a problem with handoffs.15

    Numerous surveys document health care staff concern. In an Agency for Healthcare Research and trait 2008 survey, just over half (51%) of the 160,176 hospital staff respondents reported that “important patient care information is often lost during shift changes.”16 When 93 fourth-year medical students and 228 residents responded to a survey about patient safety, (70%) agreed that improved handoffs would reduce medical mishaps.17

    Reduced resident duty hours were first introduced in unusual York status in 1989 and were mandated for every U.S. residency programs in 2003. Although reductions in duty hours may lead to less fatigue and improved well-being in residents, many maintain expressed concern about the resultant requisite for increased handoffs and reduced continuity of patient care.18 As a result of reduced hours, patients can live seen by three different physicians in the first 24 hours of their care.19 Seventy-six percent of 29 surgical residents in a unusual York study agreed that continuity of care had been negatively affected as a result of duty hours changes.20

    Discontinuity in patient care, which can occur with cross-coverage and night float systems, has been establish to lead to increased in-hospital complications,21 preventable adverse events,22 increased cost due to unnecessary tests being ordered by residents not familiar with the patient,19 and diagnostic test delays.21 In a study at one teaching hospital during a four-month period, the risk of a preventable adverse event was strongly associated (more than twice as likely) with coverage by a physician from another team.22

    Night float systems, often implemented to ensure that residents accomplish not exceed duty hours limits, maintain been renowned to result in inadequate information transfer to the covering residents.23 Nurses maintain expressed concern over these changes. Fifty-one percent of the 67 nurses who responded to a survey about a unusual resident night float system agreed that “residents don’t know the patients as well as in the primitive system.”24

    Other issues surrounding attending physicians’ and residents’ handoffs maintain been documented. Gandhi25 notes that inadequate handoffs can lead to diffused responsibility, which can live a major contributor to medical errors. In addition, Coiera26 establish that health care communications are prone to interruptions, with a third of communication events (30.6%) interrupted.27 Many of these interruptions result in inefficiencies,28 and interruptions during handoffs are likely to lead to failures of working memory,29 which result in decreased recall accuracy.

    In 2006, the average length of remain for every hospitalized patients was 4.8 days.30 Assuming that patient care transfers between covering residents and/or attending physicians occur 1 to 2 times per day, the average patient will live handed off 5 to 10 times per admission. Each of these handoffs represents a risk for inadequate communication, which could result in reduced patient safety and increased medical errors.

    In response to concerns about inadequate health care handoffs, a number of national patient safety organizations maintain highlighted the second of communication, including the Institute for Healthcare Communication31 and the National trait Forum. In 2006, the Joint Commission created a unusual National Patient Safety Goal on handoffs.32 In 2009, the goal remains virtually unchanged, requiring the organization to implement “a standardized approach to hand-off communications, including an opening to demand and respond to questions.”33

    As the preceding paragraphs suggest, there is abundant evidence of the negative consequences of indigent communication and inadequate handoffs in health care. The purpose of the current study was to identify every English-language articles on resident and/or attending physicians’ handoffs in the United States, conduct a systematic review of research studies, achieve a qualitative review of barriers and strategies mentioned across every articles, and identify features of structured handoffs that maintain been shown to live effective. This review was conducted in conjunction with the Alliance of Independent Academic Medical Centers National Initiative: Improving Patient care Through GME. The National Initiative was a collaborative formed in 2007 that linked residency programs in 19 teaching hospitals across the United States in efforts to integrate academics and trait through projects coordinated at a national level.

    Method National initiative toil group

    A toil group of the National Initiative developed resources and wrote systematic reviews of the literature in advocate of the National Initiative's goals. They performed this study as one of a string of literature reviews initiated by that group. The methodology that they employed included regular, substantive discussions about manuscript concept and design, such as key questions, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and search strategies. There were censorious interchanges among us about every essential aspects of each systematic review written by this group, including those for this report, and they reached consensus on how to treat each systematic review. The specific subject, appropriate technique, and final presentation of this systematic review are the product of a progressive, iterative, and qualitative process of refinement.

    Literature search

    We conducted a thorough and systematic literature search of English-language articles published on handoffs from 1987 to June 4, 2008 using Ovid Medline, Medline In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, CINAHL, HealthSTAR, and Christiana care full Text Journals@Ovid, followed by reference section review. The search terms used were hand-off$, handoff$, signout$, symptom out$, sign-out$, handover$, hand-over$, signover$, and sign-over$. A total of 2,590 articles were identified. every titles were reviewed for feasible inclusion, and 401 articles were obtained for further review (Figure 1). Reference sections of every 401 articles were reviewed for additional articles.

    Inclusion criteria

    Articles meeting the following criteria were eligible for review of barriers and strategies: English language, indexed in PubMed, published between 1987 and June 4, 2008, focused on health care handoffs in the United States, and including information about either resident or attending physicians’ handoffs. Articles included in the systematic review had one of the following study designs: randomized controlled trial; nonrandomized trial, with control or comparison group; single-group pre- and posttest, cohort study; single-group cross-sectional research; single-group posttest only, or qualitative research.

    Trained reviewers (J.L. and L.R.) deemed that 46 articles met inclusion criteria for the initial review of barriers and strategies. Using an iterative process, an abstraction form was developed to verify eligibility for full review, assess article characteristics, and extract data material to the study questions. This iterative process started with an initial form, which was used by two reviewers (J.L. and L.R.) to independently abstract data from four articles. The reviewers then met to dispute the abstraction form for inclusion of every material data. A second, more circumstantial form was then created for abstraction. Reviewers (J.L. and J.M.) independently distraught every data. Most abstraction disagreements were minor, and every disagreements were quickly resolved during discussion, when a consensus was reached on the distraught data.

    Quality scoring system

    Downs and Black34 created a sound and answerable checklist designed to assess both experimental and observational studies. Two systematic reviews35,36 of published systems (scales and checklists) designed to assess study trait maintain ranked the scale developed by Downs and Black as one of the best. Both of these systematic reviews went on to imply that some modifications might live useful, depending on the specific topic and study designs. Therefore, five of us (L.R., J.L., J.M., J.J., J.S.P.) developed a trait scoring form based on this approach, using four of the original items and eight modified items, which yielded scores ranging from 1 to 16, with 16 being the highest feasible score (see Chart 1). This trait scoring form contained two items related to study character and sample size, five items related to reporting, and five items related to internal validity.

    If a study included multiple assessment formats, such as interviews and a questionnaire, that resulted in different sample sizes, the largest sample was used as the sample size in the trait scoring form. There was no route to determine the number of independent study participants for each assessment method. Thus, to avoid counting the same study participant multiple times, they credited the study with the largest reported sample only.

    Quality scores were independently obtained from reviewer pairs (L.R. and J.L. or J.J.) for each study. The interrater reliability was assessed for every identified research studies (n = 18). Overall agreement was 97.7%, and Cohen's kappa for agreement between the two reviewers was r = 0.96, P < .001. every differences were resolved through discussion to yield a final trait score for each study.

    Qualitative analysis of barriers and strategies

    Conventional content analysis is a character of qualitative research used when there is limited or no existing theory on the phenomenon of interest.37 This analysis involves an iterative process that allows themes to arise from data. Researchers immerse themselves in the content and allow categories to emerge.37

    All barriers and strategies mentioned in the reviewed articles were identified and listed in phrase format in two continuous lists, one for strategies and another for barriers. Reviewers (J.L. and L.R.) met to compare lists and, through discussion, agreed on final comprehensive lists. Through an inductive iterative process, category labels were created and every phrases were moved to a category or subcategory. The final lists were reviewed by J.M. for coherence and consistency.

    Results

    Forty-six articles describing resident and/or attending physicians’ handoffs were identified. Thirty-three (71.7%) were published between 2005 and 2008 (Figure 2). Content analysis yielded 91 barriers in eight major categories and 140 strategies in seven major categories (Table 1).

    Figure 2

    Figure 2

    Table 1

    Table 1

    Twenty-two articles presented anecdotal data,38–58 one of which had a physician handoffs case sample and nursing handoffs research59; three provided circumscribed reviews,60–62 and three were editorials.63–65 The remaining 18 articles reported research on handoffs and were analyzed in depth (see the Appendix).66–83 Only one80 research study did not involve residents or maintain a graduate medical education focus. trait assessment scores for the research studies ranged from 1 to 13 (possible orbit 1–16). Six studies obtained scores of 8 or less, eight had scores between 8.5 and 11.5, and four achieved trait scores of 12 to 13.

    Only 6 of 18 (33.3%) research studies identified efficient handoff features.66,67,69,71,77,78 In studies comparing computerized handoff systems with other methods, such as personal handwritten notes, the computerized or electronic system performed better. Residents were more likely to maintain every patients on their list,67 to report that they received every essential information,78 to maintain increased satisfaction with the handoff system,67 to disburse less time in prerounding and rounding activities,67 and to self-report decreased adverse events related to handoffs.77 Others maintain renowned that resident-maintained lists in a database, such as a Microsoft Word file or outstrip database, accommodate content and medication errors.69,71 However, interns using standardized, self-maintained sign-out cards reported fewer indigent sign-outs and were more likely to record code status, patient age, and allergies.66

    Discussion

    As stated earlier, they identified 46 articles describing residents’ and attending physicians’ handoffs in the United States. Eighteen were research studies (39.1%), only two of which were randomized controlled trials. The majority (71.7%) of articles were published in recent years, which is not surprising, given the Joint Commission's National Patient Safety Goal on handoffs issued in 2006. However, as demonstrated by their trait assessment scores (see the Appendix), there is a remarkable lack of high-quality outcomes studies. It is notable that one third of the reviewed research studies obtained trait scores at or below 8 (out of a feasible 16), and only one study achieved a score of 13.

    One purpose of the current study was to identify features of physicians’ handoffs that maintain been shown to live effective. Unfortunately, only 6 of the 18 (33.3%) research studies included measures of effectiveness. Of the three studies using computerized handoff systems, one was a stand-alone system,78 and the other two had some linkage with the hospital computer system.67,77 While these every provided a structured template, they moreover relied to varying degrees on residents to enter information, which introduces an opening for errors to occur.69,71 Most of the studies assessing effectiveness used self-reported data, with a few exceptions. Van Eaton and colleagues67 looked at the number of patients missed on resident rounds and showed a lessen from 5 to 2.5 patients/team/month (P = .0001) when using a computerized handoff system. Two other studies assessed errors on resident-maintained handoff forms when compared with the medical record69,71 (a surrogate for actual medical errors) and, not surprisingly, establish errors on the resident lists.

    Of note, two survey studies documented a lack of formal handoffs instruction during residency, with 60% to 74.4% (internal medicine72 and emergency medicine,73 respectively) reporting that they maintain no lectures or workshops on the topic. Although 72.3% of the 185 emergency medicine residency/fellowship program directors studied agreed that standardized handoffs would reduce medical errors,73 the majority did not maintain a uniform policy or procedure regarding handoffs. Only one of the studies reviewed here included the development, implementation, and assessment of a formal, structured handoffs curriculum.75 Horwitz and colleagues75 provide a comprehensive curricular template for others to use; however, they relied on postsession evaluations of perceived console and second of handoffs. They commend their strategy to conduct observation of handoff skills and contemplate forward to their future publications.

    Almost every of the research articles (17 of 18; 94%) were conducted within a residency program. Graduate medical education has taken the lead in conducting handoffs research, which is one demonstration of the value added to health care by medical education.

    Handoff barriers

    We identified 91 barriers to efficient handoffs that could live organized into eight major categories. Of barrier categories, communication issues were reported most frequently (30.8%), with general communication barriers ranging from not listening to inadequate communication. Because efficient communication is an essential component of handoffs, this was an expected finding. However, hierarchy and convivial barriers constituted a less intuitive group. Here, they establish things such as relational communication barriers and residents not being likely to hand off toil to more senior residents, because of a rigid reliance on hierarchical norms that prohibit such behavior. Thus, adequately addressing handoff issues will require more than protocols, structure, and training. Understanding the complicated convivial structures and hierarchies in which residents and attending physicians work, as well as the unwritten rules that govern the handoff of patient responsibilities, will live required.

    Handoff strategies

    We identified 140 strategies that could live organized into seven major categories. Strategies for standardization were renowned most frequently (44.3%), with technological solutions (16.4%), such as computerized handoff systems, next. Interestingly, whereas communication issues constituted approximately one third of barriers, improving communication skills was renowned much less frequently (11.4%) as a strategy. Standardization would address some communication issues, but not all, such as language differences. Providing training or education (10%), evaluating the process (7.1%), and addressing environmental issues (5.7%), such as lighting and limiting interruptions and noise, earn intuitive sense. However, a less obvious strategy was insuring the recognition that a transfer of responsibility/accountability (5.0%) had occurred.

    Limitations and strengths

    Handoffs in a variety of environments were studied, which makes it difficult to disburse their findings to formulate barriers and strategies for disburse in every handoff situation. For example, some techniques may live better applied to inpatient medicine as opposed to the emergency department. In addition, they distraught barriers and strategies from every sections of the articles studied, including the introduction. This may maintain resulted in overemphasis of some barriers or strategies, depending on the author's views and on repetition. However, they only counted the same barrier or strategy multiple times if the wording was significantly different in subsequent disburse and if the two instances could stand alone as different aspects of the same category.

    Another potential limitation is that the barriers and strategies they identified (Table 1) portray the opinions of the authors of the reviewed studies. Further, they identified the barriers and strategies through a qualitative process. Although they look intuitively relevant, they were not derived from research studies designed to identify handoff barriers and strategies.

    The current study is limited by the Ovid search strategy used. Specifically, the selected search terms may not maintain included every material terms. They strengthened the possibility of identifying every articles that met inclusion criteria by reviewing the reference sections of every obtained articles. Although this strategy minimizes the risk of missing germane studies, it does not eliminate the possibility.

    Publication color refers to the possibility that high-quality studies with negative results may not maintain been published. Others maintain renowned that many trait improvement (QI) projects are not published.84 In addition, it has been their observation that some QI projects are published in newsletters, with the authors never submitting them to peer-reviewed journals. Thus, there may live outcomes studies of handoffs that are not in the peer-reviewed literature. However, the express search strategy, pellucid inclusion criteria, and systematic process used to identify and evaluate articles strengthen the trait of this review.

    Although their trait scoring system was based on a validated methodology developed to assess experimental and observational studies together, their system has not been validated across multiple settings and investigators. The relative weightings may require refinement, and there may prove to live additional material categories. The system did maintain a lofty internal reliability, and reviewers of various educational backgrounds and experience establish it straightforward and effortless to use. Further, the trait scoring system provides a reproducible template for the assessment of handoffs articles.

    Recommendations

    Numerous authors maintain renowned the dearth of research focused on handoffs.45,57,70,83,85,86 In addition, there are risks involved in implementing interventions without evidence supporting their effectiveness.87 Winters and colleagues87(p1,647) renowned that “[n]ational efforts to ameliorate patient safety should live supported by sufficiently stout evidence to warrant such a commitment of resources.”

    Evidence-based practice is informed by high-quality research. Recent publication guidelines for patient safety and trait initiatives maintain established a framework for standardized reporting.88,89 They recommend that future handoffs studies disburse the Standards for trait Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines.89 Many of the studies reviewed here would maintain been improved by doing so.

    Others maintain renowned that it may live unreasonable to anticipate patient safety and trait studies to result the design rigors of randomized controlled trials.87 However, the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness mode provides a structured, rigorous mode to synthesize data from other clinical study types with expert sentiment to provide the best available guidelines.90 Unfortunately, the literature on handoffs identified here is not of adequate trait and quantity to synthesize into evidence-based recommendations.

    Although the Joint Commission is calling for structured handoffs, they identified very shrimp evidence to advocate the disburse of any specific structure, protocol, or method. However, direct observation of handoffs in other settings (i.e., NASA mission control, nuclear power, railroad, and ambulance dispatch) with lofty consequences for error, yielded 21 common strategies,91 which could present a starting point in the development of health care handoffs research. Their review of the U.S. physicians’ handoffs literature has led us to develop a list of research questions, organized by the content domains of knowledge, attitudes, skills, process outcomes, and clinical outcomes (see List 1).

    Across the United States, hospitals are implementing structured handoff protocols in an endeavor to comply with Joint Commission requirements. High-quality outcomes studies that focus on systems factors, human performance, and the effectiveness of protocols and interventions are urgently needed. These studies should address the barriers and strategies identified here. In addition, handoffs in different disciplines are likely to maintain different requirements and issues. For instance, an emergency department handoff will requisite to maintain different content than one for inpatient medicine or pediatrics. Therefore, researchers should conduct discipline-specific handoff studies.

    We convene for rigorous outcomes studies designed to (1) assess the effectiveness of handoffs, (2) determine the elements of handoffs that lead to improved patient outcomes, and (3) identify the best implementation strategies. Finally, these studies should live reported using the SQUIRE guidelines. Without these studies, hospitals across the United States are destined to dissipate time, resources, and endeavor on flawed handoff practices.

    Acknowledgments

    Special thanks to Ellen M. Justice, MLIS, AHIP, medical librarian of the Lewis B. Flinn Medical Library, Christiana care Health System, for conducting literature searches; Dolores Ann Moran, medical library coadjutant II, and Janice Evans, medical library coadjutant II, for their assistance in locating articles; and Donald Riesenberg, MD, for feedback on the manuscript.

    References 1Chassin MR, Becher EC. The wrong patient. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:826–833. 2Donchin Y, Gopher D, Olin M, et al. A contemplate into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:143–148. 3Beckman HB, Markakis KM, Suchman AL, Frankel RM. The doctor–patient relationship and malpractice: Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Arch Intern Med. 1994;154:1365–1370. 4White AA, Wright SW, Blanco R, et al. Cause-and-effect analysis of risk management files to assess patient care in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11:1035–1041. 5White AA, Pichert JW, Bledsoe SH, Irwin C, Entman SS. antecedent and outcome analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105:1031–1038. 7Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM. Communication failures: An insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med. 2004;79:186–194. 8Keyes C. Coordination of care provision: The role of the ‘handoff.’ Int J Qual Health Care. 2000;12:519. 9Volpp KGM, Grande D. Residents’ suggestions for reducing errors in teaching hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:851–855. 11Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: A study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:488–496. 12Kachalia A, Gandhi TK, Puopolo AL, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the emergency department: A study of closed malpractice claims from 4 liability insurers. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:196–205. 13Greenberg CC, Regenbogen SE, Studdert DM, et al. Patterns of communication breakdowns resulting in injury to surgical patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:533–540. 14Gawande AA, Zinner MJ, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. Analysis of errors reported by surgeons at three teaching hospitals. Surgery. 2003;133:614–621. 15Jagsi R, Kitch BT, Weinstein DF, Campbell EG, Hutter M, Weissman JS. Residents report on adverse events and their causes. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:2607–2613. 16Agency for Healthcare trait and Research. Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture: 2008 Comparative Database Report. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/hospsurvey08. Accessed August 24, 2009. 17Sorokin R, Riggio JM, Hwang C. Attitudes about patient safety: A survey of physicians-in-training. Am J Med Qual. 2005;20:70–77. 18Fletcher KE, Parekh V, Halasyamani L, et al. toil hour rules and contributors to patient care mistakes: A focus group study with internal medicine residents. J Hosp Med. 2008;3:228–237. 19Fins JJ. Professional responsibility: A perspective on the Bell Commission reforms. Bull NY Acad Med. 1991;67:359–364. 20Barden CB, Specht MC, McCarter MD, Daly JM, Fahey TJ. Effects of limited toil hours on surgical training. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:531–538. 21Laine C, Goldman L, Soukup JR, Hayes JG. The repercussion of a regulation restricting medical house staff working hours on the trait of patient care. JAMA. 1993;269:374–378. 22Petersen LA, Brennan TA, O’Neil AC, Cook EF, Lee TH. Does housestaff discontinuity of care enlarge the risk for preventable adverse events? Ann Intern Med. 1994;121:866–872. 23Charap M. Reducing resident toil hours: Unproven assumptions and unforeseen outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:814–815. 24Buff DD, Shabti R. The night float system of resident on call: What accomplish the nurses think? J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:400–402. 25Gandhi TK. Fumbled handoffs: One dropped ball after another. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:352–358. 26Coiera E. When conversation is better than computation. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:277–286. 27Coiera EW, Jayasuriya RA, Hardy J, Bannan A, Thorpe MEC. Communication loads on clinical staff in the emergency department. Med J Aust. 2002;176:415–418. 28Coiera E, Tombs V. Communication behaviors in a hospital setting: An observational study. BMJ. 1998;316:673–676. 29Parker J, Coiera E. Improving clinical communication: A view from psychology. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000;7:453–461. 30DeFrances CJ, Lucas CA, Buie VC, Golosinskiy A. 2006 National Hospital Discharge Survey. National Health Statistics Report. July 30, 2008. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr005.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009. 34Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological trait both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:377–384. 35West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to Rate the energy of Scientific Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 47 (Prepared by the Research Triangle Institute-University of North Carolina Evidence-based practice hub under constrict No. 290-97-0011). AHRQ Publication No. 02-E016. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. April 2002. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bv.fcgi?rid=hstat1.chapter.70996. Accessed August 24, 2009. 36Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D’Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technology Assessment. 2003;7(27). Available at: http://www.ncchta.org/fullmono/mon727.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009. 37Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288. 38Communication strategies for patient handoffs. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;109:1503–1505. 39Handoff information should cover past, future. Healthc Risk Manag. 2005;27:94. 40Measure understanding during handoffs: A naval hospital uses an evaluation implement to determine whether information is understood. Brief Patient Saf. 2006:8–9. 41Patient handoff must live more than a formality. Healthc Risk Manag. 2005;27:93. 42Strategies for improving OR handoffs. OR Manager. 2005;21(8):9–10. 43What's wrong with this hand-off? Brief Patient Saf. 2006;7(1):9,12. 44Arora V, Johnson J. National patient safety goals. A model for edifice a standardized hand-off protocol. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:646–655. 45Beach C, Croskerry P, Shapiro M. Profiles in patient safety: Emergency care transitions. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10:364–347. 46Chacko V, Varvarelis N, Kemp DG. eHand-offs: An IBM Lotus Domino application for ensuring patient safety and enhancing resident supervision in hand-off communications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:874. 47Dracup K, Morris PE. Passing the torch: The challenge of handoffs. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17:95–97. 48Frazer TS. “Doctor's notes”: A computerized mode for managing inpatient care. Fam Med. 1988;20:223–224. 49Goldman L, Pantilat SZ, Winthrop F, Whitcomb WF. Passing the clinical baton: 6 principles to usher the hospitalists. Am J Med. 2001;111(9B):36S–39S. 50Kushniruk A, Karson T, Moore C, Kannry J. From prototype to production system: Lessons scholarly from the evolution of the SignOut System at Mount Sinai Medical Center. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003:381–385. 51Landucci D, Gipe BT. The technique and science of the handoff: How hospitalists share data. Hospitalist. 1999;3:4. 52Luo J, Hales RE, Hilty D, Brennan C. Clinical computing: Electronic sign-out using a personal digital assistant. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:173–174. 53Mukherjee S. A precarious exchange. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1822–1824. 54Nemeth C, Nunnally M, O’Connor M, Cook R. Creating resilient IT: How the sign-out sheet shows clinicians earn healthcare work. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006:584–588. 55Sarkar U, Carter JT, Omachi TA, et al. SynopSIS: Integrating physician sign-out with the electronic medical record. J Hosp Med. 2007;2:336–342. 56Sutker WL. The physician's role in patient safety: What's in it for me? Baylor Univ Med Cent Proc. 2008;21:9–14. 57Vidyarthi AR, Arora V, Schnipper JL, Wall SD, Wachter RM. Managing discontinuity in academic medical centers: Strategies for a safe and efficient resident sign-out. J Hosp Med. 2006;1:257–266. 58Weinstock M. Transitioning care: H&HN′s ‘Saves Lives Now’ string profiles a better route to ply patient handoffs. Hosp Health Netw. 2005;79(6):27–28. 59Haig KM, Sutton S, Whittington J. SBAR: A shared mental model for improving communication between clinicians. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006;32:167–175. 60Arora VM, Johnson JK, Meltzer DO, Humphrey HJ. A speculative framework and competency-based approach to improving handoffs. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:11–14. 61Singer JI, Dean J. Emergency physician intershift handovers: An analysis of their transitional care. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006;22:751–754. 62Solet DJ, Norvell JM, Rutan GH, Frankel RM. Lost in translation: Challenges and opportunities in physician-to-physician communication during patient handoffs. Acad Med. 2005;80:1094–1099. 63Guise JM, Lowe NK. accomplish you talk SBAR? J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006;35:313–314. 64Jauhar S. Patient handoffs, or walking along a narrow mountain ledge. Medscape J Med. 2008;10(3):57. 65Philibert I, Leach DC. Re-framing continuity of care for this century. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:394–396. 66Lee LH, Levine JA, Schultz HJ. Utility of a standardized sign-out card for unusual medical interns. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:753–755. 67Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Rossini AH, Pellegrini CA. A randomized, controlled visitation evaluating the repercussion of a computerized rounding and sign-out system on continuity of care and resident toil hours. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:538–545. 68Lofgren RP, Gottlieb D, Williams RA, affluent EC. Post-call transfer of resident responsibility: Its outcome on patient care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:501–505. 69Arora V, Kao J, Lovinger D, Seiden SC, Meltzer D. Medication discrepancies in resident sign-outs and their potential to harm. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1751–1755. 70Borowitz SM, Waggoner-Fountain LA, Bass EJ, Sledd RM. Adequacy of information transferred at resident sign-out (inhospital handover of care): A prospective survey. Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17:6–10. 71Frank G, Lawler LA, Jackson AA, Steinberg TH, Lawless ST. Resident miscommunication: Accuracy of the resident sign-out sheet. J Healthc Qual. 2005;27(2):(Web Exclusive):W2-10–W2-14. Available at: http://www.nahq.org/journal/online/pdf/webex0305.pdf. Accessed August 24, 2009. 72Horwitz LI, Krumholz HM, Green ML, Huot SJ. Transfers of patient care between house staff on internal medicine wards: A national survey. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1173–1177. 73Sinha M, Shriki J, Salness R, Blackburn PA. requisite for standardized sign-out in the emergency department: A survey of emergency medicine residency and pediatric emergency medicine fellowship program directors. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:192–196. 74Frank G, Lawless ST, Steinberg TH. Improving physician communication through an automated, integrated sign-out system. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2005;19(4):68–74. 75Horwitz LI, Moin T, Green ML. development and implementation of an oral sign-out skills curriculum. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1470–1474. 76Kannry J, Moore C. MediSign: Using a Web-based SignOut System to ameliorate provider identification. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:550–554. 77Petersen LA, Orav EJ, Teich JM, O’Neil AC, Brennan TA. Using a computerized sign-out program to ameliorate continuity of inpatient care and preclude adverse events. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998;24:77–87. 78Ram R, obscure B. Signing out patients for off-hours coverage: Comparison of manual and computer-aided methods. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1992:114–118. 79Van Eaton EG, Horvath KD, Lober WB, Pellegrini CA. Organizing the transfer of patient care information: The development of a computerized resident sign-out system. Surgery. 2004;136:5–13. 80Apker J, Mallak LA, Gibson SC. Communicating in the “gray zone”: Perceptions about emergency physician–hospitalist handoffs and patient safety. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:884–894. 81Arora V, Johnson J, Lovinger D, Humphrey HJ, Meltzer DO. Communication failures in patient sign-out and suggestions for improvement: A censorious incident analysis. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:401–407. 82Kellogg KC, Breen E, Ferzoco SJ, Zinner MJ, Ashley SW. Resistance to change in surgical residency: An ethnographic study of toil hours reform. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:630–636. 83Laxmisan A, Hakimzada F, Sayan OR, Green RA, Zhang J, Patel VL. The multitasking clinician: Decision-making and cognitive demand during and after team handoffs in emergency care. Int J Med Inform. 2007;76:801–811. 84Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on trait improvement. Draft publication guidelines: The birth of a consensus project. Qua Saf Health Care. 2005;14:319–325. 85Hamilton P, Gemeinhardt G, Mancuso P, Sahlin CL, Ivy L. SBAR and nurse–physician communication: Pilot testing an educational intervention. Nurs Adm Q. 2006;30:295–299. 86Pope BB, Rodzen L, Spross G. Raising the SBAR: How better communication improves patient outcomes. Nursing. 2008;38(3):41–43. 87Winters BD, Pham J, Pronovost PJ. Rapid response teams—Walk, don’t run. JAMA. 2006;296:1645–1647. 88Stevens DP. Why unusual guidelines for reporting improvement research? And why now? Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:314. 90Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MD, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness mode User's Manual. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND; 2001. 91Patterson ES, Roth EM, Woods DD, Chow R, Gomes JO. Handoff strategies in settings with lofty consequences for failure: Lessons for health care operations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16:125–132. © 2009 Association of American Medical Colleges Source

    Academic Medicine84(12):1775-1787, December 2009.

    Related Videos

    Data is temporarily unavailable. gratify try again soon.

    This website uses cookies. By continuing to disburse this website you are giving consent to cookies being used. For information on cookies and how you can disable them visit their Privacy and Cookie Policy.

    Got it, thanks!


    Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

    3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
    AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
    College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
    LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
    OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
    P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
    SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
    The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
    VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
    XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
    Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]





    References :


    Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11740069
    Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1ps
    Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12306787
    Issu : https://issuu.com/trutrainers/docs/lot-986
    Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/11/looking-for-lot-986-exam-dumps-that.html
    RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/WhereCanIGetHelpToPassLot-986Exam
    Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/j2xhiiseg3lbuu8vafwebqiymke536kq
    zoho.com : https://docs.zoho.com/file/62c5063d2be48003245c5b0ffd51ca1ebe1aa











    Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |



     

    Gli Eventi