920-335 Braindumps

Pass4sure 920-335 exam prep with money back guarantee | cheat sheets | stargeo.it

Complete Pass4sure q&a set is provided with VCE - examcollection and braindumps PDF questions and braindumps are recently updated - cheat sheets - stargeo.it

Pass4sure 920-335 dumps | Killexams.com 920-335 true questions | http://www.stargeo.it/new/

Killexams.com 920-335 Dumps and true Questions

100% true Questions - Exam Pass Guarantee with high Marks - Just Memorize the Answers

920-335 exam Dumps Source : BCM50 3.0 Installation and Initial Configuration

Test Code : 920-335
Test designation : BCM50 3.0 Installation and Initial Configuration
Vendor designation : Nortel
: 150 true Questions

these 920-335 dumps works in the true test.
I wound up the exam with a satisfying 84% marks in stipulated time. thank you very plenty killexams. via and by, it become tough to enact top to bottom test intending with a full-time work. At that factor, I became to the of killexams. Its concise answers helped me to survey a few complicated topics. I selected to seize a seat for the exam 920-335 to gather in addition advancement in my career.

real 920-335 questions and rectify answers! It warrant the charge.
My designation is Suman Kumar. i acquire got 89.25% in 920-335 exam upon getting your test material. thanks for providing this kind of beneficial examine dump as the explanations to the solutions are excellent. thanks killexams.com for the extremely splendid questions and answers. the best issue approximately this questions bank is the distinctive solutions. It allows me to understand the conception and mathematical calculations.

pleased to concentrate that dumps modern day 920-335 examination are available proper here.
920-335 is the toughest exam i acquire ever encounter. I spent months reading for it, with plenary legitimate assets and the gross lot one ought to discover - and failed it miserably. but I didnt give up! some months later, I delivered killexams.com to my preparation time table and saved practising at the exam simulator and the actual exam questions they offer. I believe that is precisely what helped me pass the second time around! I wish I hadnt wasted the time and money on plenary this needless stuff (their books arent terrible in general, however I reliance they dont provide you with the first-class exam instruction).

Shortest questions that works in true test environment.
This killexams.com from helped me trap my 920-335 companion affirmation. Their material are in fact useful, and the exam simulator is genuinely great, it absolutely reproduces the exam. Topics are lucid very with out issues the usage of the killexams.com test dump. The exam itself become unpredictable, so Im pleased I appliedkillexams.com . Their packs unfold plenary that I want, and i wont trap any unsavory shocks amid your exam. Thanx guys.

Did you tried these 920-335 actual query fiscal institution and study guide.
killexams.com works! I passed this exam ultimate plunge and at that point over 90% of the questions acquire been truely valid. they are noticeably likely to nevertheless exist sound as killexams.com cares to update their materials often. killexams.com is a extraordinary company which has helped me more than once. I am a regular, so hoping for chop cost for my subsequent package!

Great occasion to trap certified 920-335 exam.
The killexams.com killexams.com are the superb product as it is both light to expend and light to prepare through their trait Dumps. In many ways it influenced me, it is the utensil which I used daily for my learning. The handbook is suited for the preparing. It helped me to accomplish a considerable score in the final 920-335 exam. It offers the knowledge to accomplish better in the exam. Thank you very for the considerable support.

Dont forget to strive these latest dumps questions for 920-335 exam.
920-335 questions from killexams.com are splendid, and replicate precisely what check headquarters gives you at the 920-335 exam. I cherished the entirety approximately the killexams.com guidance material. I passed with over 80%.

Observed these maximum 920-335 Questions in true test that I passed.
A few considerable word is that I handed 920-335 test the day gone by... I thank entire killexams.com team. I truely respect the wonderful art travail which you plenary do... Your schooling material is remarkable. Maintain doing prerogative artwork. I am capable of honestly expend your product for my next exam. Regards, Emma from the ample apple

Do you exigency actual seize a peep at qustions brand novel 920-335 examination?
killexams.com material cowl every issue of 920-335 , spherical which the 920-335 exam is constructed. So if you are novel to it, that is a exigency to. I needed to step up my know-how of 920-335 qa has helped me masses. I passed the 920-335 exam thank you tokillexams.com and had been recommending it to my friends and colleagues.

Found an authentic source for true 920-335 exam questions.
Thanks a lot killexams.com team, for preparing marvelous exercise tests for the 920-335 exam. It is evident that without killexamss exam engine, students cannot even mediate of taking the 920-335 exam. I tried many other resources for my exam preparation, but I could not find myself confident enough for taking the 920-335 exam. killexamss exam lead makes light exam preparation, and gives self-confidence to the students for taking exam easily.

Nortel BCM50 3.0 Installation and

VoIP certification tracks - Nortel's assist certifications | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

As mentioned in a used tip, organizations are enforcing IP telephony greater often on their records infrastructures. The expanded deployment has created a necessity for licensed IP telephony engineers to provide confirmed, most appropriate-of-breed know-how.

The IP telephony certifications Nortel at present presents are divided into 4 classes: lead expert, Design professional, aid professional, and Design knowledgeable. This tip discusses the Nortel aid tune.

support professional

The support professional certifications are conjectural to exhibit someone's skill to enforce, function, and troubleshoot a Nortel Networks IP Telephony solution. The support professional certification reflects a candidate with three to six months of event that can exploit movements technical concerns of a common Nortel IP Telephony answer.

NNCSS - VoIP Succession BCM 3.0

This certification checks the talent to achieve in force, function, and troubleshoot the enterprise Communications manager three.0. This certification covers hardware, birth-up, information and voice networking, functions, and troubleshooting the BCM. To meander the certification, two checks must exist effectively completed: know-how requirements and Protocols for IP Telephony solutions, and Succession BCM three.0. The expertise requirements and Protocols for IP Telephony options exam is an outline of convergence applied sciences.

NNCSS - CallPilot Rls. 2.0

This certification tests the skill to implement, operate, and troubleshoot the VoIP CallPilot 2.0. This certification covers hardware, administration, interoperability with Meridian 1 switches, and safety of a separate website CallPilot system. To rush the certification, two checks acquire to exist effectively achieved: Meridian Database and CallPilot 2.0.

NNCSS - Symposium convene core Server or Symposium designation headquarters Server installation and protection

These two certifications test the talent to achieve into effect, function, and troubleshoot the Symposium convene core Server. both certifications cowl hardware, utility setting up, administration, and upkeep of Symposium designation headquarters Server four.2, Symposium internet client 4.0, and Symposium categorical 3.0. besides the fact that children, the Symposium designation core Server certification furthermore checks the structure, customized configuration and integration of the server. To rush either of these certifications, one exam must exist correctly completed: Symposium designation middle or Symposium designation core setting up and protection, respectively.

NNCSS - Symposium convene core TAPI/Agent or designation headquarters TAPI/Agent installation and protection

These two certifications verify the skill to achieve into effect, operate, and troubleshoot the Symposium convene middle TAPI/Agent. each certifications cover hardware, utility installation, administration, and preservation of Symposium TAPI 2.three and Symposium Agent 2.3. besides the fact that children, the Symposium designation middle TAPI/Agent certification furthermore exams the structure, integration, and customized configuration of the TAPI/Agent. To meander either of these certifications, one exam acquire to exist efficaciously completed: Symposium designation headquarters TAPI/Agent or Symposium convene headquarters TAPI/Agent Inst/leading, respectively.

NNCSS - Symposium specific convene headquarters or Symposium categorical designation middle installation and maintenance

These certifications verify the capacity to enforce, function, and troubleshoot the Symposium express designation core. each certifications cowl hardware, utility installing, administration, and upkeep of Symposium express designation middle 4.2. however, the Symposium categorical convene core certification additionally assessments the architecture and integration of the convene middle. To rush both of the certifications, one examination ought to exist effectively accomplished: Symposium categorical designation core or Symposium categorical designation headquarters Inst and Maint respectively.

NNCSS - VoIP Multimedia verbal exchange Server (MCS) 5100 2.0

This certification tests the capacity to enforce, function, and troubleshoot the VoIP Multimedia verbal exchange Server (MCS) 5100 2.0. This certification covers installing of the hardware and software, configuration, protection, and administration of the Multimedia verbal exchange Server (MCS) 5100 2.0. To meander the certification, two checks should exist efficaciously achieved: know-how requirements and Protocols for IP Telephony solutions, and VoIP Multimedia communication Server (MCS) 5100 2.0. The expertise requisites and Protocols for IP Telephony options exam is an outline of convergence applied sciences.

NNCSS - VoIP Succession a thousand/1000M Rls. three.0 DB Administrator

This certification exams the skill to maintain and troubleshoot the VoIP Succession a thousand/1000M Rls. 3.0 DB Administrator. This certification covers the architecture, configuration, preservation, and administration of the Meridian 1, Succession 1000 Rls. three.0, and Succession 1000M Rls. 3.0 using primary Alternate Route option (BARS) and community Alternate Route preference (NARS). To pass the certification, two exams should exist efficaciously accomplished: expertise specifications and Protocols for IP Telephony options, and Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 DB Administrator.

NNCSS - VoIP Succession one thousand/1000M Rls. 3.0 installation and protection

This certification exams the capability to deploy, configure, and hold the VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. three.0. This certification covers the setting up, structure, configuration, upkeep, and administration of the Meridian 1, Succession one thousand Rls. 3.0, and Succession 1000M Rls. three.0, cyber web Telephones i2xxx, and Optivity Telephony manager (OTM) 2.1. To meander the certification, three tests must exist successfully accomplished: know-how necessities and Protocols for IP Telephony solutions, and Succession 1000/1000M Rls. 3.0 for Technicians, and Succession one thousand/1000M Rls. 3.0.

support expert

The support skilled certifications build on the professional's edge through demonstrating their skill to achieve in force, operate, and troubleshoot an superior Nortel Networks IP Telephony solution. The assist knowledgeable certifications reflect a candidate with six to twelve months of arms-on event with the potential to lead or assist intermediate-stage personnel to retain complicated Nortel IP Telephony options.

NNCSE - CallPilot 2.0 Unified Messaging options

This certification exams the talent to achieve in force, operate, troubleshoot and optimize the VoIP CallPilot Unified Messaging concede 2.0. This certification covers the installing, administration, interoperability, protection, upgrade tactics and acquire utilization for a multi web site CallPilot device. To pass the certification, the candidate must first obtain their NNCSS - CallPilot Rls. 2.0. as a result, the CallPilot 2.0 Unified Messaging options exigency to exist efficiently completed to acquire this certification.

NNCSE - Contact core

This certification checks the skill to implement, function, troubleshoot and optimize the Contact headquarters products. This certification covers the candidate's capabilities on the Symposium designation core Server (SCCS)/Symposium specific designation center/Symposium net client, Symposium TAPI service provider (TAPI SP), Symposium Agent, and the Symposium net headquarters Portal. To meander the certification, the candidate should first acquire their NNCSS - Symposium convene core Server and the NNCSS - Symposium designation middle TAPI/Agent certification. in consequence, the Contact core examination exigency to exist efficaciously accomplished to achieve this certification.

NNCSE - IP Convergence Succession one thousand/1000M Rls. three.0

This certification exams the skill to install, configure, retain, and optimize the VoIP Succession 1000/1000M Rls. three.0. This certification covers the configuration, succession branch office (BO), far flung workplace, operation, and Meridian 1 to Succession 1000M three.0 migration methods for the Succession one thousand/1000M Rls. 3.0, internet Telephones i2xxx, far flung workplace 91xx, and Optivity Telephony supervisor (OTM) 2.1. To meander the certification, the candidate must first gather their NNCSS - VoIP Succession CSE a thousand Rls. 2.0 or the VoIP Succession a thousand/1000M Rls. three.0 installation & renovation certification. because of this, yet another greater complicated edition of the Succession a thousand/1000M Rls. three.0 examination ought to exist effectively achieved to gain this certification.

within the IT industry, certifications are a means to validate an individual's knowledge inside a unique enviornment. The above Nortel IP Telephony certifications are one of the crucial tools that may prove the capabilities of an IP Telephony assist expert. These certifications could not supersede years of industry event, but they enact supply the foundation to aid and manage Nortel Voice over IP options.

The next tip will focus on Nortel's Design IP Telephony certification tune.

Richard Parsons (CCIE#5719) is a manager of knowledgeable services for Callisma Inc., a totally owned subsidiary of SBC. He has developed a superior groundwork in networking ideas, advanced troubleshooting, and monitoring in areas comparable to optical, ATM, VoIP, routed, routing, and storage infrastructures. prosperous resides in Atlanta GA, and is a graduate of Clemson college. His historical past includes senior and most valuable consulting positions at foreign network capabilities, Lucent, and Callisma.

Nortel SCS Now helps IBM, Dell, HP structures | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

With the announcement of release three.0, Nortel’s software communication rig (SCS) solution now caters to organizations beyond minuscule and medium-measurement businesses. The solution, which comprises significant, dispensed commercial enterprise networks, is designed to support businesses add novel users and produce other alterations in-apartment.

The answer helps groups converge their communications into a centralized, effortless-to-set up, -manipulate and -use concede that may integrate seamlessly into an latest IT environment with open net-primarily based interfaces.

free up 3.0 of SCS extends support to trade-typical structures from IBM, Dell and HP, including IBM punch programs and system i, Dell Optiplex, and HP Proliant DL360, as neatly as the currently announced IBM x3350 and Dell PowerEdge R300 methods. moreover the supported platform enlargement, the Nortel SCS Developer program additionally presents dozens of interoperable third-birthday party items corresponding to desktop telephones, tender phones, gateways, IP consoles, purposes fancy designation recording and contact accounting, wireless mobility solutions, and lots extra.

"The UC market is in a transition from hardware to application, and for carriers this transition requires conviction to utility openness. IP-most effectual carriers will discover this transition a gross lot more tricky. The winners during this market can exist providers who embody open, software primarily based solutions and who produce application show to exist another application in the community," observed Zeus Kerravala, senior vice president, Yankee group.

based on Nortel, SCS offers lucid pricing with an ‘all-in-one’ strategy. A groundwork person license includes plenary applications fancy voicemail and unified messaging, integrated voice conferencing, secure presence and quick messaging, computing device-based video conferencing, separate number reachability, an ‘informal’ convene middle, and integration with Microsoft Outlook, IBM Lotus Notes and IBM Lotus Sametime.

also, through the expend of SCS, groups can trap rid of or reduce lower back on the charges concerning outsourced conferencing costs, calling card and second line fees for teleworkers, actual property, and legacy PBX preservation costs.

related hyperlinks 

Nortel Unveils network Platform

What the coming USB 3.2 standard skill for You | killexams.com true Questions and Pass4sure dumps

simply in case you thought you may chitchat with authority about USB specifications at your next dinner party, a novel one comes alongside to quiver everything up once more. The newest USB 3.2 ordinary goes to exist proven in September, and prerogative here’s what that capability to your laptop, your phone, and people novel USB-C cables you just went out and acquired.

a extremely brief inheritance of USB

USB, or accepted Serial Bus, is an agreed-upon fair that makes positive if you buy kit with USB expertise built in, then it’s plenary going to travail happily together. while we've a specific amount of dongle hell to contend with nowadays, it’s nothing in comparison to the early 90s, when desktop peripherals used every kind of odd and marvelous connectors, and it took as a minimum half a morning to install and configure your latest purchase.

The ample computing beasts Compaq, DEC, IBM, Intel, Microsoft, NEC, and Nortel plenary started travail on the USB regular in 1994, with the long-established USB 1.0 specification arriving in January 1996, with its blazing ordinary pace of 1.5 Mbit/s.

USB 2.0 adopted in April 2000, ramping up speeds to 480 Mbit/s—now not plenary that crucial for a joystick however useful for an external challenging power. yet another vast help arrived in November 2008 with USB three.0, upping the capabilities records transfer quotes once more to 5 Gbps whereas keeping backwards compatibility with USB 2.0 equipment. when you've got the latest USB three.1 installed nowadays, then you definitely acquire the talents for up to 10 Gbps of statistics transfer, in spite of the fact that most customer peripherals don’t trap near that. There’s furthermore support for providing 100W of power, which is why laptops can now exist charged by artery of USB.

Cords, plugs, and information

The USB specifications as set out via the USB Implementers forum (USB-IF) cover a number of applied sciences: not simply the protocols for piteous facts, but additionally the cables which you can use, and the connectors on the conclude of those cables. The USB-C port we’ve been listening to so much about these days is linked to, but technically chop loose, the USB specifications for facts switch. It was additionally developed by using the USB-IF, and it was introduced across the identical time as USB 3.1, but it surely furthermore works with USB 2.0 cables and gear.

In other words, just as a result of your cable has a USB-C connector on the conclusion doesn’t always imply you’re getting the goodness of USB three.1. most likely it’s more convenient to foster connectors and cables alongside information protocols—USB-C is specially designed to seize abilities of the benefits of USB three.1, merits fancy carrying adequate punch to charge laptops—however they’re basically two sever requirements, albeit closely connected. Cables the expend of the usual, flat USB-A connectors can nevertheless acquire USB three.1 inside (look for the turquoise coloring as a simple artery to determine).

USB-C has been designed as the port and connector of the future, one on the artery to travail with every exiguous thing from telephones to laptops (and travail each approaches up as neatly, as an brought bonus). We’re no longer there yet, but over the next pair of years USB-C and USB three.1 will spin into the accustomed on electronics gear, at the least except the subsequent spec rolls around...

The USB three.2 standard

USB 3.2 is (as the identify suggests) the next step up from USB 3.1, even though it won’t exist performing in your local foremost purchase any time soon—it’s most effectual simply been introduced by means of the USB-IF, and its headline feature is its aid for what’s known as multi-lane operation, where two lanes of 5 Gbps or 10 Gbps can run together in tandem by using using extra wires inner USB cables. The theoretical maximum transfer expense hence gets bumped up to twenty Gbps.

aside from that relatively vast hurry boost, the USB three.2 spec is a relatively minor upgrade, which might exist why it simplest receives a further 0.1 on the quantity count. it's going to of course travail with USB-C connectors, and in most situations you received’t ought to help your cables in case your laptop or phone makes expend of USB three.2 (more on this under).

The USB 3.2 spec is expected to exist finalized in September however how quickly they delivery seeing in purchaser electronics depends on a few components, including market developments, manufacturing schedules, and income margins. as a minimum having just a minor upgrade this time round potential the USB ports on their contraptions received’t deserve to exist tremendously retooled to trap the accustomed supported.

Future-proofing your USB buying

The splendid word for us humble consumers is that older USB necessities mind to stick round for a very long time, and newer requisites are sometimes backwards compatible—new cables will travail with historical computers and telephones, simply with probably the most performance perks dialled down. to achieve it one other means, you don’t necessarily exigency to upgrade your microUSB smartphone just to trap on the USB-C bandwagon, as a result of microUSB goes to exist supported for a long time yet.

That stated, if you exigency to future-proof your purchases and ensure they’re going to travail with plenary the other shiny novel rig popping out this yr and next, search for contraptions and cables that involve the good-end mixture of USB three.1 and USB-C connectors. You might no longer trap blazing speeds in case you join them up to older machine, however they’ll exist able for the next wave of hardware that comes along.

The bump to USB three.2 capability some latest cables will potentially exist in a position to double their records transfer rates. in case you’re using USB three.0 or USB three.1 cables with USB-C connectors, they’ll exist capable of ship twice as lots records—either 2 x 5 Gbps or 2 x 10 Gbps—due to the multi-lane technology in USB three.2. You’ll exigency rig that helps the novel USB three.2 accustomed at each conclude of the cables, however the cables themselves don’t should trap replaced to trap the additional speeds.

Whilst it is very difficult job to pick dependable exam questions / answers resources regarding review, reputation and validity because people trap ripoff due to choosing incorrect service. Killexams. com produce it inescapable to provide its clients far better to their resources with respect to exam dumps update and validity. Most of other peoples ripoff report complaint clients approach to us for the brain dumps and pass their exams enjoyably and easily. They never compromise on their review, reputation and trait because killexams review, killexams reputation and killexams client self self-confidence is valuable to plenary of us. Specially they manage killexams.com review, killexams.com reputation, killexams.com ripoff report complaint, killexams.com trust, killexams.com validity, killexams.com report and killexams.com scam. If perhaps you survey any bogus report posted by their competitor with the designation killexams ripoff report complaint internet, killexams.com ripoff report, killexams.com scam, killexams.com complaint or something fancy this, just retain in understanding that there are always snide people damaging reputation of splendid services due to their benefits. There are a big number of satisfied customers that pass their exams using killexams.com brain dumps, killexams PDF questions, killexams exercise questions, killexams exam simulator. Visit Killexams.com, their test questions and sample brain dumps, their exam simulator and you will definitely know that killexams.com is the best brain dumps site.

Back to Braindumps Menu

310-202 true questions | LOT-953 exercise test | ML0-320 exercise exam | 1Z0-897 braindumps | 000-M225 pdf download | CLEP study guide | 000-864 mock exam | C2010-577 exam questions | 000-M21 dumps | C2090-011 free pdf download | A2150-537 brain dumps | LOT-410 bootcamp | HP0-662 free pdf | 000-330 examcollection | 190-803 dump | 000-484 questions answers | LOT-836 cheat sheets | 300-360 exam prep | NS0-102 braindumps | 10-184 braindumps |

920-335 true Exam Questions by killexams.com
killexams.com supercilious of reputation of helping people pass the 920-335 test in their very first attempts. Their success rates in the past two years acquire been absolutely impressive, thanks to their jubilant customers who are now able to boost their career in the lickety-split lane. killexams.com is the number one altenative among IT professionals, especially the ones who are looking to climb up the hierarchy levels faster in their respective organizations.

killexams.com acquire its experts operating continuously for the collection of true exam questions of 920-335. plenary the pass4sure questions and answers of 920-335 accrued by their institution are seemed into and updated by using their 920-335 assured group. They sojourn related to the applicants showed up inside the 920-335 test to trap their reviews about the 920-335 test, they accumulate 920-335 exam suggestions and traps, their revel in about the tactics applied as a piece of the true 920-335 exam, the errors they achieved in the actual exam and later on modify their material as needs be. Click http://killexams.com/pass4sure/exam-detail/920-335 killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as underneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for plenary tests on website
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders more than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $99
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for plenary Orders
When you devour their pass4sure questions and answers, you will sense positive about every one of the theme matters of exam and feel that your perception has been notably moved forward. These pass4sure questions and answers arent simply exercise questions, those are actual exam questions and answers that are adequate to pass the 920-335 exam at the first attempt.

killexams.com helps a huge sweep of candidates pass the tests and trap their certification. They acquire a ample wide variety of fruitful reviews. Their dumps are solid, slight, updated and of truly satisfactory considerable to overcome the demanding situations of any IT certifications. killexams.com exam dumps are most recent updated in notably clobber manner on celebrated premise and material is discharged every now and then. Most recent killexams.com dumps are accessible in testing focuses with whom we're retaining up their relationship to trap most recent material.

killexams.com Nortel Certification study guides are setup through IT specialists. Most people complaint that there are an excessive sweep of questions in this sort of sizable wide variety of schooling assessments and exam resource, and they may exist recently wiped out to manage the cost of any extra. Seeing killexams.com experts exercise session this far accomplishing rendition at the same time as soundless assurance that each one the getting to know is secured after profound studies and exam. Everything is to produce consolation for hopefuls on their road to affirmation.

We acquire Tested and Approved 920-335 Exams. killexams.com offers the most specific and most recent IT exam materials which almost incorporate plenary exam topics. With the lead of their 920-335 study materials, you dont exigency to squander your risk on perusing major piece of reference books and honestly want to parch through 10-20 hours to ace their 920-335 true questions and answers. Whats greater, they provide you with PDF Version and Software Version exam questions and answers. For Software Version materials, Its presented to present the candidates reenact the Nortel 920-335 exam in a actual surroundings.

We give free updates. Inside legitimacy duration, if 920-335 exam materials which you acquire received up to date, they will let you know with the aid of email to down load maximum latest variation of . On the off hazard that you dont pass your Nortel BCM50 3.0 Installation and Initial Configuration exam, They will give you plenary refund. You should ship the scanned reproduction of your 920-335 exam document card to us. Subsequent to asserting, they will unexpectedly provide you with plenary REFUND.

killexams.com Huge Discount Coupons and Promo Codes are as beneath;
WC2017 : 60% Discount Coupon for plenary tests on internet site
PROF17 : 10% Discount Coupon for Orders extra than $69
DEAL17 : 15% Discount Coupon for Orders greater than $ninety nine
DECSPECIAL : 10% Special Discount Coupon for plenary Orders

In the event which you trap ready for the Nortel 920-335 exam utilising their exam simulator engine. It is something however difficult to succeed for plenary certifications inside the number one undertaking. You dont want to exploit plenary dumps or any loose torrent / rapidshare plenary stuff. They proffer free demo of every IT Certification Dumps. You can solemnize the interface, question considerable and ease of expend of their schooling exams earlier than you select to buy.

920-335 Practice Test | 920-335 examcollection | 920-335 VCE | 920-335 study guide | 920-335 practice exam | 920-335 cram

Killexams CRCM sample test | Killexams 000-286 exercise test | Killexams 212-065 exercise exam | Killexams A2010-657 brain dumps | Killexams IIA-CIA-Part3 cheat sheets | Killexams 000-609 true questions | Killexams PDM-2002001060 true questions | Killexams VCAN610 brain dumps | Killexams 1Z0-067 cram | Killexams 000-701 questions and answers | Killexams JN0-340 pdf download | Killexams 6104 braindumps | Killexams 70-542-VB dumps | Killexams C9010-262 braindumps | Killexams HQT-4210 free pdf download | Killexams COG-132 mock exam | Killexams 70-487 examcollection | Killexams HP0-240 questions answers | Killexams 000-900 exercise test | Killexams CSSGB test prep |

killexams.com huge List of Exam Braindumps

View Complete list of Killexams.com Brain dumps

Killexams 650-472 questions and answers | Killexams 642-542 exercise Test | Killexams IC3-1 sample test | Killexams 642-272 dumps | Killexams 920-430 brain dumps | Killexams E20-542 exercise questions | Killexams HP2-E38 study guide | Killexams 000-386 cheat sheets | Killexams 190-981 questions answers | Killexams 101-350 free pdf | Killexams 050-ENVCSE01 questions and answers | Killexams 000-N34 exercise questions | Killexams 000-892 braindumps | Killexams 000-676 exercise test | Killexams 1Z0-495 exercise test | Killexams P2090-046 braindumps | Killexams 000-992 exam prep | Killexams F50-531 braindumps | Killexams E20-575 exam prep | Killexams QQ0-300 study guide |

BCM50 3.0 Installation and Initial Configuration

Pass 4 positive 920-335 dumps | Killexams.com 920-335 true questions | http://www.stargeo.it/new/

Intel Compute Stick (review) | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps


This may exist one of the most difficult items I acquire ever been given to review simply because this device can exist so many things to so many different people. The Intel Compute Stick was one of those products that, upon unboxing and holding it in my hands, made me think, “I had no idea that this technology even existed.”  If you are wondering what makes this device so extraordinary it’s the fact that the Intel Compute stick is a plenary blown Windows 10 operating computer that is about the same size as a pack of gum. Now, there are other products on the market that harness similar technology in this micro profile factor fancy the Roku or Chromecast, but these devices utilize their own proprietary software, and the scope of what they can actually accomplish, is very narrow. You almost acquire to hold it in your palm and expend it for a exiguous while before it really sinks in on how advanced this thing really is.

Installation and initial startup were extremely intuitive. The Compute stick plugs into the HDMI port of your TV or monitor and you provide it with power using the power cable they conveniently provided you with. In the Compute Stick’s first boot up, it was immediately able to recognize my wireless media keyboard, which for me, was the Microsoft plenary In One Media Keyboard, and I was gently ushered through your typical Windows 10 setup menus. After no more than 10 minutes from when I plugged it plenary in, it booted into the OS, and I was soon free to explore. I was very jubilant to survey that there was virtually no bloatware to exist found, not that it would exist sage to bog down a PC this minuscule anyways with frivolous programs. After just a few days of use, and only installing programs fancy Google Chrome and Steam, the C drive only had 12 Gb left of the 32 Gb that it had total, before the operating system. If you are a person who would exist using this device heavily, it would really exist sage to invest in some major cloud storage. There is a micro SD slot on the device, as well, so that you can expend for expanded physical storage space, if you are not a fan of the cloud.

In my testing, the Intel Compute Stick performed very well in nearly everything I tried to enact with it. It was able to run everything in the Microsoft Office Suite, Photoshop, and, most importantly for me, ran very smooth as a remote desktop interface to my primary desktop… sort of. While the compute stick does crow a dual troop wireless internet card, I had a difficult time getting a solid signal in my house, even in the exact same spot where my Roku and Chromecast would travail perfectly. With optimal signal, I was able to stream DOOM from my primary PC to the Compute Stick and it looked really clean and the controls had virtually no lag. piteous the Stick a few rooms over was another record entirely. Streaming DOOM was extremely choppy, Street Fighter V was playable, but it didn’t peep very good. To exist completely honest, streaming games that are that graphically intensive is a huge job for any streaming device. Games fancy Castle Crashers, Nidhogg, and liberty Planet plenary worked perfectly, and looked awesome, even from across the house. I pushed the Compute Stick to its remote streaming limits, and from a gamer’s perspective, it really did impress me, under example Wi-Fi circumstances. If you live in a larger house, though, and intend on trying to expend the Compute Stick to enact some remote PC gaming, you will likely need to invest in either some splendid Wi-Fi extenders, or utilize one of your USB slots for a USB-to-network adapter.

What’s in the Box?

Typical of Intel, the retail packaging is slick and without much wasted space. The size of the box is much more than what you would anticipate to see, housing a CPU, and not a complete PC. Included were the standard safety and precautions paperwork that comes with everything these days, as well as the basic Intel Compute Stick user manual, that I enact recommend reading before setup, just so you know how to trap your configuration and wireless peripherals working correctly the first time without having to backtrack. Thankfully, there is furthermore an HDMI male-to-female dongle adapter, which is a necessity for people who don’t acquire much margin on your HDMI TV ports, or acquire any port obstructions from a wall mount. They were furthermore generous enough to involve not only the wall wart, but furthermore plenary of the different wall adapters, based on whatever region you live in. terminal and most importantly in the box is the computer, itself.

The computer is powered by the aforementioned wall wart, which connects to the Compute Stick via micro USB plug-in. There is one blue USB port for USB 3.0 and one black port for USB 2.0, a physical power button, and a mini-SD slot to expand on the 32 Gb of physical remembrance that comes stock with the computer.


Tech Specs:

Processor: Intel Atom x5-Z8300 (2M Cache, Up to 1.8 GHz)

Storage: 32 GB

Memory: 2 GB DDR3L-1600

Graphics: Intel Integrated

Intel Wireless 802.11ac w/ Bluetooth 4.0

Check The Complete Specs HERE


Final Reaction:

I mediate that the Intel Compute Stick is damn impressive. The most difficult thing for me – when trying to review it – is imagining who this device is for. It’s a exiguous too expensive and less user-friendly when trying to warrant using it as an alternative to the Roku or Chromecast. While its profile factor is incredibly minuscule and portable, it’s not quite powerful enough to compete with a solid productivity tablet or netbook. From a unadulterated consumer standpoint, this is something that is really frosty , but I wouldn’t necessarily recommend it to my mom and dad, due to the flush of application it takes to maintain it. Windows updates, the potential for viruses, needing to retain a wireless keyboard handy, they plenary require the user to exist pretty technical. On the other hand, in the traffic and professional settings this thing is astonishing. Setting this thing up to run simple programming macros, slideshows for the television of your minuscule traffic lobby, or performing presentations at a conference are just the tip of the iceberg of what this thing is capable of. This thing is a Swiss army knife of functionality. While many of its functions can exist done by other products in a more focused capacity- and enact them arguably better- the Intel Compute Stick can soundless trap the job done, as well as a dozen other jobs you might not even know you exigency it to enact yet. Plus, its minuscule enough to wear around your neck!

NR 4 Atoms - B

4/5 Atoms

The STK1AW32SC  Intel Compute Stick was provided to Nerd Reactor for this review by Intel

Qubes 3.0 Linux OS Ships with Killer Features, Qubes 3.1 to Bring a Live USB Edition | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

On the first day of October, Joanna Rutkowska comes with word about the release and immediate availability for download of the final build of the Qubes 3.0 Linux kernel-based computer operating system.

According to the announcement, Qubes 3.0 is a major release that brings a host of novel features, under-the-hood improvements, and bugfixes, plenary in order to retain the Qubes OS distribution reliable, stable, and useful to users worldwide. The novel version is now based on HAL (Hypervisor Abstraction Layer), which lets Qubes OS developers to switch the underlying hypervisors more easily, even at installation time.

Furthermore, Qubes OS 3.0 updates the Xen open-source hypervisor software to version 4.4, a release that introduces better hardware support and performance, optimizes the performance of the Qubes' qrexec framework for inter-VM services, adds the officially supported Debian templates, and integrates the Whonix templates for optimizing TOR workflows.

"About 5 months after the initial release of Qubes 3.0-rc1, we're now releasing the final 3.0 today," says Joanna Rutkowska. "As previously announced earlier this summer, they acquire decided to dedicate this release of Qubes OS to the remembrance of Caspar Bowden. Caspar has been a supercilious user, supporter, and advocate for Qubes OS, and furthermore a friend. I mediate he would acquire liked that dedication."

Qubes 3.1 coming at the conclude of the month

The Qubes OS developers inform us that no novel features acquire been added since the release of the first RC (Release Candidate) build of Qubes 3.0, five months ago. Only faultfinding bugs acquire been squashed and various core components optimized. Qubes 3.0 is dedicated to Caspar Bowden, a British privacy advocate, formerly chief privacy adviser at Microsoft.

In some happier news, the first point release of Qubes 3 is scheduled for deployment at the conclude of the month, bringing more novel features, such as UEFI (Unified Extensible Firmware Interface) support, a Live USB edition, as well as the ample killer feature: pre-configuration and management stack. In the meantime, you can download Qubes 3.0 prerogative now from Softpedia.

Scalable, Traceable Time for Datacenters Using GNSS and White Rabbit | killexams.com true questions and Pass4sure dumps

Accurate and dependable timing and synchronization can exist an enabler of diverse novel applications in datacenters. Accurate clocks across different nodes produce viable key functions fancy consistency, event ordering, causality and the scheduling of tasks and resources with precise timing. In this article the authors seize a nearby peep at scalable and traceable time for datacenters using GNSS and White Rabbit.

In finance and e-commerce, clock synchronization is crucial for determining transaction order: a trading platform needs to match bids and offers in the order in which they were placed, even if they entered the trading platform from different gateways. In distributed databases, accurate clock synchronization allows a database to invoke external consistency and improves the throughput and latency of the database.

NTP, the celebrated clock synchronization protocol via internet, is cheap and light to deploy, but its accuracy is typically in the millisecond range. The Precision Timing Protocol (PTP) provides an accuracy of around 100 ns in a local, fully “PTP-enabled” network. If the network hardware is not fully PTP-enabled, synchronization accuracy can demean by a factor of 1,000. Both NTP and PTP accomplish poorly under high network load.

White Rabbit (WR) is a collaborative project for the development of a novel Ethernet-based technology to ensure sub-nanosecond synchronization and deterministic data transfer. The project uses an open source paradigm for the development of its hardware, gateware and software components. Core hardware designs and source code are publicly available.

In this article they debate the combined usage of GNSS and WR for timing and synchronization in datacenters. The topics of GNSS-to-WR phase alignment and GNSS calibration are addressed. An oversight budget is furthermore developed to support traceability analysis from the timing solution at the user conclude node to a reference time scale such as UTC.

White Rabbit and its Integration with GNSS

The WR project was initiated at CERN in 2008 to synchronize different processes in its particle accelerator network. One of the main aims of the project is to deliver such functionality while using – or extending where needed – existing standards. To achieve sub-nanosecond synchronization WR utilizes Synchronous Ethernet (SyncE) for syntonization (frequency transfer), and IEEE 1588 Precision Time Protocol (PTP) to communicate time. A two-way exchange of the PTP synchronization messages allows precise adjustment of clock phase and offset. The link detain is known precisely via accurate hardware timestamps and the calculation of detain asymmetry. WR extends PTP in a backwards-compatible artery to achieve sub-ns accuracy. WR was originally conceived for synchronization of more than 1,000 nodes via fiber or copper connections of up to 10 km, but coverage of longer distances has been already achieved.

Figure 1 shows the layout of a typical WR network. Data-wise it is a standard Ethernet switched network, i.e., it follows a typical Ethernet tree or ring topology where any node can talk to any other node according to IP address and network protocol mechanisms. Regarding synchronization, there is a hierarchy established by the fact that switches acquire downlink and uplink ports and a master/slave relationship. A switch uses its downlink ports to connect to uplink ports of other switches and discipline their time. The uppermost WR switch in the hierarchy is usually called the “grandmaster”. The grandmaster receives its notion of time through external One Pulse Per Second (1PPS) and 10-MHz inputs. In this article they will assume that the top-level timing signals approach from a GNSS receiver.

A rectify phase alignment between GNSS and WR timing signals is essential for an unbiased and deterministic time distribution downstream. A typical GNSS receiver provides the time reference through its output 1PPS signal. The output 10-MHz frequency signal from GNSS “follows” the 1PPS coherently, i.e., the derivative of the 1PPS phase in time is consistent with the output frequency. However the phase relationship between the two signals is normally arbitrary. This is depicted in figure 2, where B represents the rising edge of the 1PPS signal (which actually determines the time), and A represents the nearest zero-crossing of the 10-MHz frequency signal. The time contrast A-B is not deterministic and can change after receiver power cycles and possibly furthermore after GNSS signal interruptions.

Furthermore, a typical WR grandmaster uses as main reference its input 10-MHz frequency and “locks” onto it continuously. The input 1PPS is only used at start-up to determine the nearest zero-crossing of the input frequency signal. Afterwards, the 1PPS is no longer used. Thus the time inception for WR is actually the initial zero-crossing of the input frequency signal, not the input 1PPS. This can result in a synchronization oversight between GNSS and WR of up to 50 ns (half the 10-MHz wavelength).

To overcome this problem, they acquire developed a novel device (called “DOWR”) that integrates seamlessly a GNSS receiver and a WR grandmaster. The GNSS receiver is based on an industrial single-frequency GPS chip. The DOWR incorporates a novel artery to continuously align the WR phase to the 1PPS from GNSS, using a dedicated FPGA module (shown in figure 3). In this artery the unknown phase relationship between the 1PPS and 10-MHz signals from GNSS becomes irrelevant. A minuscule residual mis-alignment between the GNSS and WR 1PPS signals remains after applying this scheme. This offset is constant after start-up, and is strictly bounded within ± 1 ns.

GNSS Timing and its Calibration

GNSS timing receivers generate a precise 1PPS timing signal aligned to GNSS system time or to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) as disseminated by GNSS. In the case of GPS, system time is called GPS Time (GPSt), and GPS’ dissemination of UTC is based on UTC(USNO), which is the UTC realization from the U.S. Naval Observatory. In a very simplified explanation, a GPS receiver estimates the instantaneous receiver clock jaundice (i.e., the clock offset versus GPSt or UTC) from its PVT solution using pseudoranges and navigation messages. The receiver then advances or delays electronically its internal clock signal accordingly in order to generate a 1PPS signal aligned to GPSt or UTC.

GNSS calibration is a well-established exercise inside the metrological community. Indeed, the GNSS signal experiences a detain when traveling across the GNSS antenna, the antenna cable, and the receiver itself. The total detain of the chain, reflected in the output 1PPS, can achieve a few hundred ns, with the major contributor being normally the detain of the antenna cable. When using GNSS for time transfer between national UTC laboratories, the calibration of the “receiver chain” (antenna + cable + receiver) is an essential job to properly compare atomic clocks and time scales in different countries at the ns level.

GMV has recently collaborated with the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB) in a project called AKAL, to consolidate a procedure for absolute calibration of time-transfer GNSS receiver chains (see Garbin, et alia, Additional Resources). Absolute calibration consists in measuring the signal delays by means of simulated signals produced by signal generators: a GNSS simulator for the receiver, and a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) for the antenna and the antenna cable. Absolute calibration of GNSS receivers has been gaining interest inside the timing community due to the low mistrust flush that can exist achieved, and furthermore due to the exigency of having a reference calibrated receiver, especially in a multi-GNSS context including the novel Galileo and BeiDou signals. The mistrust attainable from absolute calibration is in the order of 1 ns for the gross chain.

The absolute calibration of the antenna in AKAL is done in the Compact Antenna Test sweep (CATR) at ESA/ESTEC, shown in figure 4, thus benefiting from a big anechoic chamber. For the emitting antenna, a standard Gain Horn (SGH) antenna is used. The calibration of the detain of the separate SGH is done by means of using two identical SGHs and halving the resulting delay.

Regarding the GNSS receiver itself, absolute calibration is done by means of a GNSS signal simulator, where one can eliminate plenary atmospheric effects, as well as any multipath and environmental interference, and one can generate signals synchronized with the same clock being fed to the receiver. The output signal of the GNSS simulator needs first to exist calibrated to appraise with low mistrust the detain of the incoming signal in the receiver.

The calibration of antenna cables is usually not cumbersome. Their detain can exist easily measured by means of a time interval counter, injecting a 1PPS signal at one cable end, and recording the contrast with the output 1PPS from the other cable end. The attainable mistrust is well below the ns, and is only slightly less accurate than using more sophisticated rig such as a VNA. 

Unlike metrological time transfer, in industrial GNSS timing applications the calibration of the receiver chain is often ignored. This can lead to timing biases of up to a few hundred ns. Unlike time-transfer receivers, industrial receivers enact not normally acquire connectors for an external reference clock (frequency and 1PPS inputs), only the output 1PPS signal derived from GNSS is accessible (generated from an internal, inexpensive clock). A simplified artery to calibrate an industrial receiver chain is by measuring the time contrast between its output 1PPS and the 1PPS from the reference clock of a UTC timing laboratory. In 2017, two such receiver chains were sent by GMV for calibration using this artery to PTB (Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt), the German national metrology institute. Each chain is composed of an industrial single-frequency GPS receiver and an inexpensive patch antenna. The calibration was based on the measured differences between the 1PPS generated by the receivers (i.e., GPSt as determined by the receiver from pseudorange measurements) and the 1PPS of UTC(PTB), the German realization of UTC. The calibration mistrust reported by PTB is 2.5 ns, which takes into account the mistrust in the contrast between UTC(PTB) and the GPSt generated by the receiver’s 1PPS, and furthermore the errors in the GPS solution (mainly the residual ionospheric error).

UTC laboratories enact not always proffer such calibration services to the common users. An alternative is to expend an existing absolutely calibrated receiving chain as a reference for the industrial receiver, and measuring the time contrast between their output 1PPS signals. The minute procedure is explained in the following paragraphs. To define and test the procedure they acquire used as reference an absolutely calibrated receiving chain. They therefore first calibrated a “golden” time-transfer receiver chain, following the AKAL procedure at the ESTEC laboratory, and measuring the antenna, receiver, and antenna cable delays separately. The golden chain was then installed back at GMV. As a target receiver chain they acquire used one of the two chains calibrated at PTB in 2017. In this artery they can compare the results of the two independent calibration methods. They installed the golden and target antennas on GMV’s rooftop, as shown in figure 5. The minute setup is sketched in figure 6. The delays of the two antenna cables involved were measured beforehand using a time interval counter.

Precise coordinates were calculated for each antenna using real-time kinematic (RTK). They configured the two GPS receivers’ PVT in an identical artery (as far as viable given that they are different models), i.e., fixed position, GPS-only using C1 code, 5-degree altitude mask, Klobuchar model, and the 1PPS aligned to GPSt. In this artery the output 1PPS signals from the two receivers should match except for a jaundice due to the different chain delays, and lickety-split variations due to the relative 1PPS generation mistrust (“jitter”), which are assumed to exist zero on fair and thus not adding a calibration oversight as long as a data span of enough duration is used.

The combined detain of antenna plus receiver in the target chain is first measured (A+B in figure 6, left). The time contrast measured in the counter between the 1PPS of the golden chain and the 1PPS of the target chain over one hour is shown in figure 7. Notice that, as expected, the 1PPS contrast is fairly stable, with a standard aberration of 1.8 ns due mainly to the relative jitter of the 1PPS from the two receivers. When the delays of the two antenna cables are subtracted, the resulting combined detain of antenna and receiver in the target chain (A+B) is 90 ns. This matches very well with the value measured at PTB in 2017 (90.3 ns), considering that the two methods are totally independent.

Additionally, they can measure separately the receiver-only detain of the target chain (B in figure 6, right). In order to enact this they install the golden and target receivers on a common antenna (for illustration the target one) using a splitter. From the counter, a similar plot is obtained (shown on the prerogative of figure 7). The resulting detain for the target receiver (B) is 68 ns. Since the combined detain of antenna and receiver in the target chain (A+B) is 90 ns, they can conclude furthermore that the detain of the target antenna (A) is 22 ns. A summary of the results is shown in Table 1. 

The mistrust of the proposed relative calibration artery is tentatively estimated to exist around 2.0 ns, derived from the nominal mistrust in the absolute calibration of the golden chain (1.5 ns in GPS C1, from AKAL). It is valuable to notice that other than the absolutely calibrated golden chain, the calibration procedure of the target chain can exist carried out by means of a counter (alternatively an oscilloscope), which is inexpensive rig in comparison to absolute calibration rig (VNA and GNSS simulator). Furthermore, once a target receiver chain has been calibrated in factory by the proposed method, it can exist used as reference to calibrate additional chains using the same relative procedure.

Testing GPS in Combination with White Rabbit

Once the receiver chain has been calibrated, they can input the total detain by configuration in the GPS receiver in order to obtain an output 1PPS signal free of delays. This feature, together with the GPS-to-WR auto-alignment described above, allows the distribution of unbiased timing signals aligned to a known reference (GPSt or UTC) throughout the datacenter. In order to test the time generation and distribution capabilities of GPS combined with WR, they acquire set up a testing platform at GMV, shown in figure 8. A schema of the setup is depicted in figure 9.

In their setup, the timing signals are generated by the newly developed GPS and WR grandmaster (the DOWR), which is connected to a patch GPS antenna on GMV’s rooftop. The receiver is configured to process GPS only, using an accurate fixed position calculated beforehand, and generating a 1PPS aligned to GPSt. 

The DOWR is connected in cascade to two WR switches called LENs, using a 1-km optical fiber spool in the first hop, and a 1-m optical fiber segment in the second hop. The DOWR and the LENs provide through a SMA connector the 1PPS generated from WR. The interface between the hardware units and the optical fiber is done through SFP transceivers. A counter is then used to measure the time contrast between the original 1PPS from the DOWR and the final 1PPS from the second LEN. The test setup in installed in a standard office, and no particular margin temperature control is in place.

An illustration of the results over one day can exist create in figure 10, where “WR0” and “WR2” indicate the 1PPS from the DOWR and the 1PPS from the second LEN, respectively. As can exist seen, the results prove a nearly constant jaundice of 0.7 ns and an extremely low babel (standard aberration of 33 ps). The behind long-term variation is most likely due to rig thermal stabilization and temperature variations in the office. The 0.7-ns jaundice is deterministic and depends mainly on the character and trait of the SFPs, on the number of WR hops, and on the total length of optical fiber.

For a limited number of WR hops (<10) and a limited total length of optical fiber (<10 km), they acquire observed that the total oversight in the WR time distribution never exceeds 1 ns. This allows a scalable, sub-ns distribution of timing across multiple servers in the datacenter.

In addition to the WR-derived 1PPS that is distributed downstream, the DOWR outputs through another SMA connector (“AUX”) the native 1PPS signal from GPS. This allows measuring the initial misalignment between the two signals. They acquire carried out an additional experiment to study the sensitivity of the initial misalignment to power cycles. The DOWR was switched off and on 10 times, and the fair offset between its two 1PPS signals (native from GPS and WR-derived) was measured by means of a counter. Notice that a DOWR power cycle implies a complete reacquisition of the GPS signals and a restart of the PVT algorithm. The results prove that the GPS-to-WR misalignment fluctuates around zero and is bounded within ± 1 ns, with a resulting standard aberration of 0.5 ns. 

Time Traceability and oversight Budget

Metrological and legal traceability require an “unbroken chain of calibrations that relate to a reference, with each calibration having a documented measurement uncertainty” (see Matsakis, et alia, Additional Resources). In the bailiwick of GPS timing they can consider two well-established references: GPSt and UTC. While GPSt is a real-time time scale available directly from the GPS signals, UTC should exist understood as the official UTC maintained by the BIPM, which is only available a posteriori in the Circular T. In the definition of traceability above, “calibration” should exist understood in their case as each individual contributor or oversight source in the gross time generation and distribution chain (i.e., GPS and WR errors).

The resulting oversight budget is shown in Table 2 and is justified in the following paragraphs. Notice that each mistrust is evaluated at a 1-sigma (68.3%) flush of confidence, and that the value generically indicates the combined stochastic (“noise”) and deterministic (“bias”) uncertainty. Constant margin temperature is assumed.

For the GPS part, the first factor to consider is whether the receiver is single-frequency (i.e., L1) or dual-frequency (i.e., L1/ L2). Although the DOWR is based on a single-frequency receiver, they develop an oversight budget for dual-frequency GPS too, for completeness. The main edge of using dual-frequency GPS is that the ionospheric oversight in the pseudorange cancels out completely when using the well-known iono-free pseudorange combination. As a downside to this, the receiver babel and multipath error, and to a lesser extent the residual calibration error, are amplified in the GPS iono-free combination.

Our GPS oversight budget is based on the well-established concept of User sweep oversight (URE). The URE is the mistrust in the pseudorange and includes errors from the satellite control segment such as orbit and clock, as well as atmospheric propagation effects, multipath, and user rig noise. It is reasonable to model these errors as being uncorrelated, and the aggregate URE can exist defined as the Root-Sum-Square (RSS) of these individual components. A recent revision of global GPS URE values can exist create in the paper by Reid, et alia in Additional Resources. They acquire adapted slightly these values for their analysis, which is done directly in ns instead of meters. In single-frequency GPS, the residual ionospheric oversight is the oversight remaining in the pseudorange after applying the Klobuchar ionospheric model. It is very difficult to give a separate value for this oversight since it depends very strongly on the solar activity, on the time of the day, and on the user location. They acquire chosen 4 ns as a typical value, as reported by Reid et alia, but this should exist taken with caution. The tropospheric oversight is the oversight remaining in the pseudorange after applying a recognized model such as MOPS. Regarding the receiver babel and multipath error, they acquire decided to reduce the value given by Reid et alia (again, survey Additional Resources) to 30 cm (i.e., 1 ns), which they believe is more representative of modern receivers, and furthermore in order to cover the possibility of pseudorange smoothing using the carrier. In the case of dual-frequency GPS, they multiply the single-frequency babel and multipath by 3, the iono-free amplification factor in GPS L1/L2.

We acquire additionally included the contribution of Timing Group detain (TGD) errors. The broadcast GPS orbits and clocks are computed by the ground control system using the P1/P2 iono-free combination. If the user receiver is single-frequency, the broadcast TGD for each satellite must exist added to the broadcast satellite clock in order to align it to the P1 pseudorange. In their oversight budget they assume a TGD mistrust of 1.5 ns, which includes viable errors in the broadcast TGDs (see again Garbin, et alia) and furthermore a viable exigency of knowledge about the C1-P1 satellite jaundice (which is only broadcast in the novel CNAV message of GPS).

In GPS positioning, the user position oversight is the combination of several factors, namely, the URE, the number of satellites in view, and the user-satellite geometry. The case of GPS timing is fairly different since most timing receivers allow to “fix” the antenna position to a pre-computed value, and thus a minimum of just one satellite is required to appraise the receiver clock bias. For simplicity, in their oversight budget calculation they will assume a “minimum timing scenario” with fixed position and only one GPS satellite in view, thus the URE projects directly into a time error. In this scenario there is no degradation in the time oversight due to position calculation, but there is furthermore no improvement in the time oversight from the usage of several satellites. They assume an antenna 3D position oversight of 30 cm (1 ns) in single-frequency and 3 cm (0.1 ns) in dual-frequency. This position accuracy can exist obtained offline using for illustration Precise Point Positioning (PPP) processing a raw measurement batch of 1-day duration. Also, they will assume that the instantaneous oversight in the receiver clock jaundice estimation from GPS translates directly into a 1PPS error, although this could exist smoothed out using a stable receiver clock and a suitable steering algorithm.

Additional effects associated to the GPS receiver are taken into account such as a viable jitter on its output 1PPS (1.5 ns), and a residual oversight in the GPS calibration: 2.0 ns in single-frequency (C1), and 3.0 ns in dual-frequency (P1/P2). For the WR part, they involve the initial misalignment between the GPS and WR 1PPS signals, and the time distribution oversight along a typical WR chain (0.5 ns and 1 ns, respectively, as explained in the previous section).

The oversight in the UTC distributed by GPS in its navigation message is considered as the terminal contribution, so that they can dissect separately the case when the user selects GPSt as a reference and the case when UTC is used. The UTC oversight is actually composed of two parts: the first piece is derived from the fact that the UTC realization used by GPS, i.e., UTC(USNO), actually deviates from the official UTC published by the BIPM; the second piece is due to the prediction oversight of UTC(USNO) relative to GPSt, as contained in the GPS navigation message. They appraise the combined UTC mistrust to exist 3 ns.

All the errors described above can exist considered as uncorrelated, so the aggregate total oversight can exist calculated as the RSS of the individual oversight sources. As a result, they obtain the total time oversight at the WR conclude node, using a single-frequency or a dual-frequency GPS receiver, and using GPSt or UTC as reference (see rows N and P in Table 2).

It is furthermore of interest to appraise the relative synchronization oversight between two WR conclude nodes in the same datacenter. If a separate GPS receiver is used for the gross datacenter, only the WR distribution oversight must exist considered (row Q). If different receivers are used in the datacenter, plenary URE errors, except the intrinsic receiver babel and multipath, can exist considered very similar (because of the same geographical location) and cancel out between receivers, and only babel and multipath, non-URE GPS errors, and WR-related errors must exist considered (row R). 

Finally, they can appraise the relative synchronization oversight between two WR conclude nodes in two sever datacenters located anywhere in the world (row S). In this case they can consider plenary the errors described above as uncorrelated between the two sites, except the UTC error, which is common to plenary sites, since the predicted offset of UTC to GPSt is a global model transmitted by the constellation. When using UTC as reference, the UTC oversight cancels out between the two sites, thus the synchronization oversight between the two sites is the same one as when using GPSt as reference.

In plenary cases (intra-datacenter and inter-datacenter) they assume that the same character of receiver (single-frequency or dual-frequency) and the same time reference (GPSt or UTC) is used everywhere.


By accurately calibrating the GPS receiver chain and seamlessly integrating the GPS and White Rabbit timing signals, they are able to dispense the timing from GPS via WR with a degradation of just around 1 ns over 1 km. Using single-frequency GPS, and considering plenary GPS and WR errors, they are able to timestamp (and therefore synchronize) any server inside a datacenter with a typical oversight smaller than 10 ns (at 1 sigma) versus UTC. Furthermore, given the ubiquity of GPS, the approach can exist applied to datacenters at any location in the world. Assuming uncorrelated errors between sever sites, they can establish that any pair of servers in the world can exist synchronized to each other with a typical oversight furthermore smaller than 10 ns (at 1 sigma). This is particularly intriguing to guarantee the consistency and transaction ordering of distributed databases and fiscal trading engines.

The usage of dual-frequency GPS for timing is not extremely advantageous. The ionospheric oversight cancels out completely using dual-frequency, but the receiver babel and multipath oversight gets amplified by a factor of 3 in the iono-free combination. Also, the residual GPS calibration oversight is roughly doubled in the iono-free combination, depending on the calibration technique employed. In consequence, in moderate solar activity the typical single-frequency timing mistrust is only slightly larger than the dual-frequency one. This conclusion should exist taken with caution since the instantaneous ionospheric oversight could exist much larger depending on the solar activity, on the time of the day, and on the user location.


The golden GNSS receiver chain absolutely calibrated is composed of a multi-frequency Septentrio PolaRx5TR time-transfer receiver, and a multi-band Leica AR20 choke-ring geodetic-type antenna.

The LEN is a WR switch and conclude node developed by Seven Solutions. The DOWR is a novel GPS and WR grandmaster device developed jointly by Seven Solutions and GMV, based on the LEN platform.

The DOWR and the two receiver chains calibrated at PTB in 2017 incorporate the single-frequency (L1) LEA-M8F receiver from u-blox, connected to a single-band Tallysman TW2710 patch antenna.

The time interval counter used at GMV is a Keysight 53230A providing 20-ps resolution.

Additional Resources:

1. Garbin, E., P. Defraigne, P. Krystek, R. Píriz, B. Bertrand, P. Waller, “Absolute calibration of GNSS timing stations and its applicability to true signals”, Metrologia, Volume 56, Number 1, 14 December 2018

2. Matsakis, D., J. Levine, M. Lombardi, “Metrological and Legal Traceability of Time Signals”, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Precise Time and Time Interval Systems and Applications Meeting, Reston, Virginia, January 2018, pp. 59-71

3. Reid, T. G. R. , A. M. Neish, T. Walter, P.K. Enge, “Broadband LEO Constellations for Navigation”, J Inst Navig, 65: 205–220, 2018

4. Serrano, J., M. Cattin, E. Gousiou, E. van der Bij, T. Włostowski, G. Daniluk, M. Lipinski,, “The White Rabbit Project”, IBIC 2013


Ricardo Píriz is an aeronautical engineer from the Polytechnic University of Madrid. He started his career as a Flight Dynamics engineer in the Precise Orbit Determination group at ESOC, the European Space Operations headquarters in Darmstadt, Germany. Later on he moved to Eutelsat in Paris, as a Mission Analysis engineer in the Satellite Procurement Division. Since 2001 he has been in the GNSS traffic Unit of GMV working on several projects, in particular in the GIOVE Mission (the experimental phase of Galileo), and in the Galileo Time Validation Facility (TVF). He is currently Leader of the GNSS Time & Frequency Group.

Esteban Garbin is an Electronics and Telecommunication engineer who got his Ph. D. from Politecnico di Torino in 2017. His research studies focused mainly on GNSS receivers and signal processing algorithms, particularly for interference and spoofing detection and mitigation. Since June 2017 he has been working for GMV, focusing on different aspects in the GNSS Advanced User Segment solutions division, mainly developing novel concepts on GNSS timing and receivers.

Javier Díaz received the M.S. degree in electronics engineering and the Ph. D. degree in electronics from the University of Granada, Spain, in 2002 and 2006, respectively. He is currently an Associate Professor with the Department of Computer Architecture and Technology, University of Granada. His current interests involve high-performance image processing architectures, safety-critical systems, highly accurate time synchronization, and frequency distribution techniques. He is furthermore co-founder of Seven Solutions, a leading company in White Rabbit technology based in Granada, Spain.

Pascale Defraigne is Project Leader at the Royal Observatory of Belgium. She completed her PhD in Physics at the Université Catholique de Louvain (UCL), Belgium, in 1995, for studies on mantle convection and deformations of the Earth internal boundaries. She then moved to the Royal Observatory of Belgium to start research activities on GNSS time and frequency transfer. Her research activities involve remote atomic clock comparisons, time scale generation, and ionospheric sounding based on GNSS measurements. She is deeply involved in the development and upgrade of the Galileo System for plenary what concerns the Galileo System Time. Among her involvement in international bodies, she assured the Presidency of the Commission 31 “TIME” of the International Astronomical Union (2006-2009) and since 2012 assures the Chair of the CCTF Working Group on GNSS Time Transfer (CCTF being the Consultative Committee for Time and Frequency, sub-committee of the International Committee for Weights and Measurements). She furthermore is a member of the GNSS Science Advisory Committee of the European Space Agency since 2012.

Related Articles

EU’s Green Week Brings Focus to GNSS and Protectin... Chris Hegarty – Never A lifeless Moment Would you prefer to acquire more signals or more sate... Ligado Fight Comes Down to altenative of Interference ... GNSS IoT Positioning: From Conventional Sensors to... Deadline Near: DHS Program to Assess GPS Jamming, ...

Direct Download of over 5500 Certification Exams

3COM [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
AccessData [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACFE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Acme-Packet [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACSM [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ACT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Admission-Tests [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
ADOBE [93 Certification Exam(s) ]
AFP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
AICPA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
AIIM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alcatel-Lucent [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Alfresco [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Altiris [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Amazon [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
American-College [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Android [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
APA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
APICS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Apple [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
AppSense [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
APTUSC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Arizona-Education [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ARM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Aruba [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASIS [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASQ [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
ASTQB [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Autodesk [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Avaya [96 Certification Exam(s) ]
AXELOS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Axis [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Banking [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
BEA [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
BICSI [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlackBerry [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
BlueCoat [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Brocade [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Objects [11 Certification Exam(s) ]
Business-Tests [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CA-Technologies [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certification-Board [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Certiport [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
CheckPoint [41 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIPS [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cisco [318 Certification Exam(s) ]
Citrix [48 Certification Exam(s) ]
CIW [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cloudera [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Cognos [19 Certification Exam(s) ]
College-Board [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CompTIA [76 Certification Exam(s) ]
ComputerAssociates [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Consultant [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Counselor [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institue [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
CPP-Institute [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CSP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
CWNP [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Dassault [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
DELL [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
DMI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
DRI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECCouncil [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
ECDL [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
EMC [129 Certification Exam(s) ]
Enterasys [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Ericsson [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
ESPA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Esri [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExamExpress [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Exin [40 Certification Exam(s) ]
ExtremeNetworks [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
F5-Networks [20 Certification Exam(s) ]
FCTC [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Filemaker [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Financial [36 Certification Exam(s) ]
Food [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fortinet [13 Certification Exam(s) ]
Foundry [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
FSMTB [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Fujitsu [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
GAQM [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Genesys [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GIAC [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Google [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
GuidanceSoftware [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
H3C [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
HDI [9 Certification Exam(s) ]
Healthcare [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
HIPAA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hitachi [30 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hortonworks [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hospitality [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
HP [750 Certification Exam(s) ]
HR [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
HRCI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Huawei [21 Certification Exam(s) ]
Hyperion [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAAP [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IAHCSMM [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBM [1532 Certification Exam(s) ]
IBQH [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ICDL [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
IEEE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IELTS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IFPUG [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
IIBA [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IISFA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Intel [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
IQN [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
IRS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISACA [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISC2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISEB [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
Isilon [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
ISM [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
iSQI [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
ITEC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Juniper [64 Certification Exam(s) ]
LEED [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Legato [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Liferay [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Logical-Operations [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Lotus [66 Certification Exam(s) ]
LPI [24 Certification Exam(s) ]
LSI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Magento [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Maintenance [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
McAfee [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
McData [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Medical [69 Certification Exam(s) ]
Microsoft [374 Certification Exam(s) ]
Mile2 [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Military [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Misc [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Motorola [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
mySQL [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
NBSTSA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCEES [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCIDQ [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NCLEX [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Network-General [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
NetworkAppliance [39 Certification Exam(s) ]
NI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
NIELIT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nokia [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Nortel [130 Certification Exam(s) ]
Novell [37 Certification Exam(s) ]
OMG [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
Oracle [279 Certification Exam(s) ]
P&C [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Palo-Alto [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PARCC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PayPal [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Pegasystems [12 Certification Exam(s) ]
PEOPLECERT [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
PMI [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Polycom [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
PostgreSQL-CE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Prince2 [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
PRMIA [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PsychCorp [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
PTCB [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
QAI [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
QlikView [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Quality-Assurance [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
RACC [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Real-Estate [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
RedHat [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RES [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
Riverbed [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
RSA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sair [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
Salesforce [5 Certification Exam(s) ]
SANS [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAP [98 Certification Exam(s) ]
SASInstitute [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
SAT [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCO [10 Certification Exam(s) ]
SCP [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
SDI [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
See-Beyond [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Siemens [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Snia [7 Certification Exam(s) ]
SOA [15 Certification Exam(s) ]
Social-Work-Board [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
SpringSource [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUN [63 Certification Exam(s) ]
SUSE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
Sybase [17 Certification Exam(s) ]
Symantec [134 Certification Exam(s) ]
Teacher-Certification [4 Certification Exam(s) ]
The-Open-Group [8 Certification Exam(s) ]
TIA [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Tibco [18 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trainers [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Trend [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
TruSecure [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
USMLE [1 Certification Exam(s) ]
VCE [6 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veeam [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Veritas [33 Certification Exam(s) ]
Vmware [58 Certification Exam(s) ]
Wonderlic [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
Worldatwork [2 Certification Exam(s) ]
XML-Master [3 Certification Exam(s) ]
Zend [6 Certification Exam(s) ]

References :

Dropmark : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/11888356
Wordpress : http://wp.me/p7SJ6L-1YS
Dropmark-Text : http://killexams.dropmark.com/367904/12857598
Blogspot : http://killexamsbraindump.blogspot.com/2017/12/look-at-these-920-335-real-question-and.html
RSS Feed : http://feeds.feedburner.com/LookAtThese920-335RealQuestionAndAnswers
Box.net : https://app.box.com/s/i3jf7gapusydg0lfw4cqctqa4ncc9ik4

Killexams exams | Killexams certification | Pass4Sure questions and answers | Pass4sure | pass-guaratee | best test preparation | best training guides | examcollection | killexams | killexams review | killexams legit | kill example | kill example journalism | kill exams reviews | kill exam ripoff report | review | review quizlet | review login | review archives | review sheet | legitimate | legit | legitimacy | legitimation | legit check | legitimate program | legitimize | legitimate business | legitimate definition | legit site | legit online banking | legit website | legitimacy definition | pass 4 sure | pass for sure | p4s | pass4sure certification | pass4sure exam | IT certification | IT Exam | certification material provider | pass4sure login | pass4sure exams | pass4sure reviews | pass4sure aws | pass4sure security | pass4sure cisco | pass4sure coupon | pass4sure dumps | pass4sure cissp | pass4sure braindumps | pass4sure test | pass4sure torrent | pass4sure download | pass4surekey | pass4sure cap | pass4sure free | examsoft | examsoft login | exams | exams free | examsolutions | exams4pilots | examsoft download | exams questions | examslocal | exams practice |


Gli Eventi